Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order for FIR Against Police Officer in SC/ST Act Case, Citing Lack of Preliminary Enquiry

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court today quashed an order directing the registration of an FIR against ACP Bijender Singh under the SC/ST Act, emphasizing the necessity of a preliminary enquiry before initiating criminal proceedings against a public servant.

The case arose from a parking dispute involving a complaint against police personnel, leading to an FIR under the SC/ST Act and IPC. The appellant, ACP Bijender Singh, filed the chargesheet but was later directed by a special court to lodge an FIR against himself for alleged non-compliance with the SC/ST Act. The appeal contested this order.

The complaint, initiated over a parking scuffle, escalated into allegations of insult and threat under the SC/ST Act. The appellant, as the investigating officer, filed a chargesheet without arresting the accused, citing Supreme Court guidelines. The complainant accused the appellant of dereliction of duty under the SC/ST Act, leading to the special court's order for an FIR against Singh.

Justice Jasmeet Singh highlighted the need for a preliminary enquiry in cases against public servants, referencing the Supreme Court's rulings in P. Sirajuddin and Lalita Kumari. The Court observed that the special court passed its order hastily without such an enquiry. It was noted, "It is not the function of the court to monitor the investigation process so long as the investigation does not violate any provision of law."

The judgment underscored the legal requirement for a preliminary enquiry before initiating criminal proceedings against public servants, as per the proviso to Section 4 of the SC/ST Act and as established in Lalita Kumari.

The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned order, stating, "Hence, once the administrative enquiry has exonerated the appellant from the same charges, then the continuation of the criminal prosecution would be an abuse of process of law."

Bijender Singh Vs. State & Anr.

Date of Decision: February 08, 2024

 

Latest Legal News