Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order for FIR Against Police Officer in SC/ST Act Case, Citing Lack of Preliminary Enquiry

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court today quashed an order directing the registration of an FIR against ACP Bijender Singh under the SC/ST Act, emphasizing the necessity of a preliminary enquiry before initiating criminal proceedings against a public servant.

The case arose from a parking dispute involving a complaint against police personnel, leading to an FIR under the SC/ST Act and IPC. The appellant, ACP Bijender Singh, filed the chargesheet but was later directed by a special court to lodge an FIR against himself for alleged non-compliance with the SC/ST Act. The appeal contested this order.

The complaint, initiated over a parking scuffle, escalated into allegations of insult and threat under the SC/ST Act. The appellant, as the investigating officer, filed a chargesheet without arresting the accused, citing Supreme Court guidelines. The complainant accused the appellant of dereliction of duty under the SC/ST Act, leading to the special court's order for an FIR against Singh.

Justice Jasmeet Singh highlighted the need for a preliminary enquiry in cases against public servants, referencing the Supreme Court's rulings in P. Sirajuddin and Lalita Kumari. The Court observed that the special court passed its order hastily without such an enquiry. It was noted, "It is not the function of the court to monitor the investigation process so long as the investigation does not violate any provision of law."

The judgment underscored the legal requirement for a preliminary enquiry before initiating criminal proceedings against public servants, as per the proviso to Section 4 of the SC/ST Act and as established in Lalita Kumari.

The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned order, stating, "Hence, once the administrative enquiry has exonerated the appellant from the same charges, then the continuation of the criminal prosecution would be an abuse of process of law."

Bijender Singh Vs. State & Anr.

Date of Decision: February 08, 2024

 

Latest Legal News