"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Eviction Orders, Highlights Distinction Between Sections 14(1)(e) and 14(1)(g) of DRC Act

05 September 2024 5:34 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasmeet Singh, has set aside eviction orders and emphasized the critical distinction between Sections 14(1)(e) and 14(1)(g) of the Delhi Rent Control (DRC) Act. The judgment, delivered on October 4, 2023, in the case of RC.REV. 540/2018 and connected petitions, revolves around the eviction of tenants from Katra Ganga Bishan, Bagh Raoji, Gaushala Marg, Kishanganj, Delhi – 110006, owned by the petitioner, Vijay Kumar Farshwal.

The Hon'ble Justice Singh's observations shed light on the legal intricacies of eviction under the DRC Act. In a significant ruling, the court clarified that the mere labeling of an eviction petition as a "bona fide need" under Section 14(1)(e) cannot bypass the requirements of Sections 14(1)(f) and 14(1)(g), which pertain to reconstruction, demolition, and rebuilding of premises. Justice Singh noted, "Eviction sought under Section 14(1)(e) includes the need by the landlord for the purpose of running a business or conducting commercial activity." This distinction underscores the importance of correctly categorizing eviction petitions and their implications.

Furthermore, the judgment highlights the limited scope of review petitions. Justice Singh reiterated that review petitions should not be allowed to function as "appeals in disguise." He emphasized that a review can only be sought if there is an "error apparent on the face of the order" and that erroneous decisions cannot be reheard and corrected through the review process.

The judgment also addressed the timing of review petitions and the power of Rent Controllers. It emphasized that while Rent Controllers may not have the power to recall an order, they can review their own orders under certain circumstances, particularly if a miscarriage of justice is evident.

This judgment is expected to have significant implications for eviction proceedings under the DRC Act, providing clarity on the distinctions between various eviction grounds and the appropriate procedures to be followed. It reaffirms the importance of adhering to the legal provisions and procedures specified in the Act when seeking eviction of tenants in Delhi.

Date of Decision: 04 October 2023

VIJAY KUMAR FARSHWAL  vs SHRI KISHAN LAL 

Similar News