Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Delhi High Court Raps Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan for Violating Rights of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Persons under RPwD Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court Raps Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan for Violating Rights of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Persons under RPwD ActIn a scathing judgment, the Delhi High Court has rebuked the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) for its failure to uphold the rights of Persons with Disabilities (PwDs), especially those who are deaf and hard of hearing. The court observed that KVS violated statutory provisions under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act) while issuing job advertisements.

Key points:

Ignoring Statutory Provisions: The court pointed out that KVS had ignored Sections 2(f), 17, and 34 of the RPwD Act, which mandate a 4% reservation for PwDs, including 1% reserved specifically for deaf and hard of hearing persons.

Outdated Notification: KVS relied on an outdated notification from 2013 for reservation calculations, neglecting the operative notification from 2021. As a result, certain posts did not provide the required reservation for deaf and hard of hearing persons.

Recruitment Process Concerns: While the court expressed concerns about the discontinuation of services for selected candidates if the advertisements were quashed, it directed KVS to provide 1% reservation for deaf and hard of hearing persons against total vacancies and initiate a special recruitment drive to fill the reserved vacancies.

Emphasis on Reasonable Accommodation: The judgment emphasized the legislative vision of providing reasonable accommodation to PwDs and criticized KVS for viewing them from a lens of inconvenience rather than facilitating their rights under the RPwD Act.

Reference to Judicial Precedent: The court referred to a recent judgment directing KVS to provide 1% reservation to blind and low vision persons, issuing a similar directive in the present case to clear the backlog of vacancies for deaf and hard of hearing persons within a stipulated timeframe.

Appointment Directive: Specific posts like Principal, Vice-Principal, Post Graduate Teacher (PGT), etc., were identified in the notification from 2021 for reservation. The court directed KVS to appoint deaf and hard of hearing persons on these identified posts in accordance with the statutory provisions of the RPwD Act.

This judgment serves as a stern reminder to government organizations to uphold the rights of PwDs and ensure compliance with the RPwD Act. It also reflects the judiciary’s commitment to promoting inclusivity and equal opportunities for all citizens.

This landmark judgment underscores the importance of adherence to disability rights legislation and calls for immediate corrective action by KVS to rectify its violations.

Date of Decision: 01 November 2023

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTIO VS KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/01_Nov_23_Court_Own_Motion-Vs-KV_Sanghtha-Del.pdf"]

Latest Legal News