CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Delhi High Court Orders Fresh Elections for Supreme Court Bar Association Multi-State Co-operative Society's Board of Directors

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has issued a directive for the conduct of fresh elections to the Board of Directors (BoD) of the Supreme Court Bar Association Multi-State Co-operative Group Housing Society Limited (SCBA-MSCGHS). The court's decision comes after the tenure of the existing BoD expired, and disputes arose regarding the process of holding new elections.

The court's judgment emphasized the need to avoid a legal vacuum and ensure the smooth functioning of the co-operative society. In this context, it quoted the doctrine of necessity, stating, "Law does not contemplate a vacuum, and a solution has to be found out rather than allowing the problem to boil over."

The court outlined two possible scenarios for the conduct of fresh elections. First, it directed the Central Government to establish the Co-operative Election Authority (CEA) within three weeks. If the CEA is formed within this timeframe, it will be responsible for conducting the elections within four weeks of its establishment.

Alternatively, in case the CEA is not established within three weeks, the court appointed Justice S.N. Dhingra, a retired judge of the court, as the Returning Officer to oversee the elections. The court clarified that this appointment would take effect only if the CEA is not established within the specified timeframe.

The court also addressed several prayers made in related applications, including requests for restraining the existing BoD from acting further and the appointment of an administrator. It declined these requests, highlighting the need for proper accounting and auditing of the society's financial activities.

Furthermore, the court emphasized that its directions should not affect compliance with orders from the Supreme Court and Allahabad High Court.

Delhi High Court provides clarity on the process of conducting fresh elections for the SCBA-MSCGHS's BoD and underscores the importance of avoiding legal gaps in such matters.

Date of Decision: 03 November  2023

SADHANA SANDHU & ANR. VS SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION  MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIEITY LTD. & ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-03-Nov-2023-Sadhna-Vs-SCBA.pdf"]

Latest Legal News