Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Delhi High Court Holds Negligent Authorities Liable for Child's Death; Awards Rs. 23,33,666/- Compensation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has held the respondents, Northern Railway and another party, liable for the death of a 12-year-old boy and directed them to pay a compensation of Rs. 23,33,666/- to the grieving parents. The court found the respondents negligent in their duty, leading to the unfortunate incident.

Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain and Justice Najmi Waziri, while delivering the judgment, stated, "The respondents were negligent in taking safety measures at the site to prevent any accident. The respondents are jointly and severally liable for their act of negligence and to pay compensation to the appellants." The court emphasized that the liability to pay compensation for a civil wrong and a criminal wrong are independent and mutually exclusive.

The court further assessed the compensation to be awarded, stating, "The appellants are entitled to claim 'Standard Compensation or Conventional Amount' and 'Pecuniary Compensation' from the respondents." The Standard Compensation was determined at Rs. 3,08,666/-, considering inflation and the erosion of the value of the rupee. Additionally, the court awarded pecuniary compensation of Rs. 20,25,000/-, considering the loss of earnings and dependency.

The judgment highlighted the importance of addressing negligence, stating, "The liability of respondents to pay compensation for civil wrongs is not discharged by the compensation received for criminal liability. The respondents cannot be absolved from their responsibility to take proper safety measures and prevent such unfortunate incidents."

This landmark judgment serves as a reminder to authorities to exercise due care and fulfill their duty to safeguard public safety. The compensation awarded by the court aims to provide some solace to the grieving family and holds the respondents accountable for their negligence.

Decided on: 26th May, 2023

SHARAFAT KHAN & ANOTHER  vs  NORTHERN RAILWAY & ANOTHER 

Similar News