Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

DELHI HIGH COURT GRANTS INTERIM BAIL TO FATHER TO MEET NEWBORN CHILD

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent order, the High Court of Delhi has granted interim bail to a father, Mr. Karim, allowing him to meet his newborn child. The court's decision comes in response to a bail application (Bail Appln. No. 1949/2023) filed by Mr. Karim under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The petitioner's counsel argued that Mr. Karim's wife recently gave birth to a baby boy and is currently unable to properly care for the child due to her weakened state. Emphasizing the importance of father-child bonding, the counsel requested the court to grant interim bail to Mr. Karim, enabling him to support his wife and newborn. It was assured that Mr. Karim would surrender himself at the conclusion of the 45-day bail period and would not seek any further extension.

The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, acknowledged the verified fact of the child's birth and expressed no objection to providing relief to Mr. Karim.

Considering the circumstances and the petitioner's newfound role as a father, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar granted interim bail for a period of 45 days. The court imposed certain conditions, including the submission of a personal bond, restriction on leaving the jurisdiction of the State of NCT of Delhi without prior permission, providing contact details to the authorities, and sharing daily location updates via a mobile application.

This ruling serves as a precedent recognizing the significance of parental involvement in a child's early life, ensuring the welfare of both the child and the parents. The court's decision reflects a balance between the interests of justice and the petitioner's familial responsibilities.

Mr. Karim's counsel expressed satisfaction with the court's decision, acknowledging the court's sensitivity to the needs of families and their new additions. The ruling will undoubtedly provide Mr. Karim an opportunity to cherish the joys of fatherhood while responsibly addressing his legal obligations.

DATE OF DECISION: June 2, 2023

KARIM vs STATE NCT OF DELHI 

Similar News