Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

DELHI HIGH COURT GRANTS INTERIM BAIL TO FATHER TO MEET NEWBORN CHILD

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent order, the High Court of Delhi has granted interim bail to a father, Mr. Karim, allowing him to meet his newborn child. The court's decision comes in response to a bail application (Bail Appln. No. 1949/2023) filed by Mr. Karim under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The petitioner's counsel argued that Mr. Karim's wife recently gave birth to a baby boy and is currently unable to properly care for the child due to her weakened state. Emphasizing the importance of father-child bonding, the counsel requested the court to grant interim bail to Mr. Karim, enabling him to support his wife and newborn. It was assured that Mr. Karim would surrender himself at the conclusion of the 45-day bail period and would not seek any further extension.

The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, acknowledged the verified fact of the child's birth and expressed no objection to providing relief to Mr. Karim.

Considering the circumstances and the petitioner's newfound role as a father, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar granted interim bail for a period of 45 days. The court imposed certain conditions, including the submission of a personal bond, restriction on leaving the jurisdiction of the State of NCT of Delhi without prior permission, providing contact details to the authorities, and sharing daily location updates via a mobile application.

This ruling serves as a precedent recognizing the significance of parental involvement in a child's early life, ensuring the welfare of both the child and the parents. The court's decision reflects a balance between the interests of justice and the petitioner's familial responsibilities.

Mr. Karim's counsel expressed satisfaction with the court's decision, acknowledging the court's sensitivity to the needs of families and their new additions. The ruling will undoubtedly provide Mr. Karim an opportunity to cherish the joys of fatherhood while responsibly addressing his legal obligations.

DATE OF DECISION: June 2, 2023

KARIM vs STATE NCT OF DELHI 

Latest Legal News