Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court

DELHI HIGH COURT GRANTS INTERIM BAIL TO FATHER TO MEET NEWBORN CHILD

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent order, the High Court of Delhi has granted interim bail to a father, Mr. Karim, allowing him to meet his newborn child. The court's decision comes in response to a bail application (Bail Appln. No. 1949/2023) filed by Mr. Karim under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The petitioner's counsel argued that Mr. Karim's wife recently gave birth to a baby boy and is currently unable to properly care for the child due to her weakened state. Emphasizing the importance of father-child bonding, the counsel requested the court to grant interim bail to Mr. Karim, enabling him to support his wife and newborn. It was assured that Mr. Karim would surrender himself at the conclusion of the 45-day bail period and would not seek any further extension.

The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, acknowledged the verified fact of the child's birth and expressed no objection to providing relief to Mr. Karim.

Considering the circumstances and the petitioner's newfound role as a father, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar granted interim bail for a period of 45 days. The court imposed certain conditions, including the submission of a personal bond, restriction on leaving the jurisdiction of the State of NCT of Delhi without prior permission, providing contact details to the authorities, and sharing daily location updates via a mobile application.

This ruling serves as a precedent recognizing the significance of parental involvement in a child's early life, ensuring the welfare of both the child and the parents. The court's decision reflects a balance between the interests of justice and the petitioner's familial responsibilities.

Mr. Karim's counsel expressed satisfaction with the court's decision, acknowledging the court's sensitivity to the needs of families and their new additions. The ruling will undoubtedly provide Mr. Karim an opportunity to cherish the joys of fatherhood while responsibly addressing his legal obligations.

DATE OF DECISION: June 2, 2023

KARIM vs STATE NCT OF DELHI 

Latest Legal News