Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims Equity Aids the Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses to Revive 36-Year-Old Pay Parity Claim Students Cannot Be Penalised For Legislative Invalidity: Supreme Court Protects Degrees Granted Before 2005 Yash Pal Verdict Restructuring Without Fulfilment of Conditions Cannot Defeat Insolvency: Supreme Court Reaffirms Default as the Sole Trigger Under Section 7 IBC Section 100-A CPC Slams The Door On Intra-Court Appeals In RERA Matters”: Allahabad High Court Declares Special Appeal Not Maintainable Mental Distance Between ‘May Be’ and ‘Must Be’ Is Long: Patna High Court Acquits Six in Murder Case Built on Broken Chain of Circumstances Where Corruption Takes Roots, Rule of Law Is Replaced by Rule of Transaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar

DELHI HIGH COURT GRANTS INTERIM BAIL TO FATHER TO MEET NEWBORN CHILD

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent order, the High Court of Delhi has granted interim bail to a father, Mr. Karim, allowing him to meet his newborn child. The court's decision comes in response to a bail application (Bail Appln. No. 1949/2023) filed by Mr. Karim under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The petitioner's counsel argued that Mr. Karim's wife recently gave birth to a baby boy and is currently unable to properly care for the child due to her weakened state. Emphasizing the importance of father-child bonding, the counsel requested the court to grant interim bail to Mr. Karim, enabling him to support his wife and newborn. It was assured that Mr. Karim would surrender himself at the conclusion of the 45-day bail period and would not seek any further extension.

The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, acknowledged the verified fact of the child's birth and expressed no objection to providing relief to Mr. Karim.

Considering the circumstances and the petitioner's newfound role as a father, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar granted interim bail for a period of 45 days. The court imposed certain conditions, including the submission of a personal bond, restriction on leaving the jurisdiction of the State of NCT of Delhi without prior permission, providing contact details to the authorities, and sharing daily location updates via a mobile application.

This ruling serves as a precedent recognizing the significance of parental involvement in a child's early life, ensuring the welfare of both the child and the parents. The court's decision reflects a balance between the interests of justice and the petitioner's familial responsibilities.

Mr. Karim's counsel expressed satisfaction with the court's decision, acknowledging the court's sensitivity to the needs of families and their new additions. The ruling will undoubtedly provide Mr. Karim an opportunity to cherish the joys of fatherhood while responsibly addressing his legal obligations.

DATE OF DECISION: June 2, 2023

KARIM vs STATE NCT OF DELHI 

Latest Legal News