Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Grants Injunction Against Copyright Infringement on Digital Platforms

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered by JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH on September 27, 2023, the Delhi High Court has taken a firm stance against copyright infringement in the digital age. The case, involving unauthorized distribution of educational course materials, has raised significant concerns over the rampant copying and dissemination of copyrighted works on various digital platforms.

The judgment's key observation, "Prima facie case established - Balance of convenience favors Plaintiff – Irreparable harm if infringing activity continues – Injunction granted against Defendants,” underscores the seriousness of copyright infringement on digital platforms.

The case revolves around Plaintiff M/s Jainemo Private Limited, a company specializing in educational materials and vocational courses, including coding, computer programming, and website development. Their courses are in high demand, with thousands of students enrolled, making them a prime target for copyright infringement.

Defendants, numbering 1 to 14, 24, 25, 29, and 30, were found to be downloading, uploading, storing, sharing, transmitting, selling, or utilizing the Plaintiff’s course material without authorization. This infringement occurred on a variety of digital platforms, including Telegram, WhatsApp, YouTube, Google Drive, and Mega.

The judgment has far-reaching implications, as it not only restrains Defendants from further infringing activities but also places responsibility on digital platform providers to take specific actions to block infringing content and disclose the details of infringers.

The Court has ordered:

- Blocking of infringing content on platforms like Telegram and YouTube.

- Disclosure of details of infringing channels/devices, including mobile numbers, IP addresses, and email addresses.

- Locking and suspending domain names related to copyright infringement.

- Deactivation of mobile numbers involved in copyright infringement on WhatsApp.

- Disbanding infringing groups on WhatsApp.

The judgment reflects the evolving legal landscape in the digital age, emphasizing the need to protect copyright owners’ rights while addressing the challenges of online infringement. It highlights the responsibility of digital platform providers to cooperate with copyright owners in curbing copyright violations.

The case is scheduled to be listed before the Court on March 22, 2024, as the Court continues to monitor compliance with its orders.

This judgment serves as a significant precedent in the battle against copyright infringement in the digital sphere, sending a clear message that copyright violations will not go unchecked in the digital age.

Date of Decision: September 27, 2023

JAINEMO PRIVATE LIMITED vs RAHUL SHAH AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News