Part-Time Workers Serving For Decades Entitled To Regularization; 'Uma Devi' Ruling Cannot Be Weaponized To Deny Legitimate Claims: Rajasthan High Court Order Rejecting Or Allowing To Register FIR U/S Section 156(3) CrPC Application Is Not Interlocutory; Criminal Revision Is Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Default Bail | Failure To Produce Accused During Hearing For Extension Of Remand Time Is Gross Illegality, Violates Article 21: Andhra Pradesh High Court Section 138 NI Act Liability Of Directors Subsists Despite Initiation Of Liquidation Proceedings Against Company: Supreme Court Purchaser Of Property For Valuable Consideration Cannot Be Accused Of Cheating Original Owner If Title Document Is Forged: Supreme Court Appointment Of Minor To Public Post Is Per Se Illegal, Void Ab Initio: Allahabad High Court Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Abdicate Duty To Decide Limitation Objection Merely Because High Court Appointed Arbitrator: Allahabad High Court Deemed Conveyance Cannot Be Restricted To Building Footprint; Must Include Appurtenant Open Spaces Required By Planning Law: Bombay High Court Mere Discovery Of Accused's Presence At A Location Not A 'Fact Discovered' Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Delhi High Court Acquits Official In 1989 Bribe Case Section 307 IPC Is Not A 'Minor Offence' To Section 324 IPC; Accused Cannot Be Convicted For Attempt To Murder If Only Charged With Voluntarily Causing Hurt: Delhi High Court Landowners Under National Highways Act Entitled To 15% Interest On Enhanced Compensation; Denial Is Discriminatory: Punjab & Haryana HC Omission Of Village Name In Gazette Notification No Bar To Laying Transmission Lines If Area Falls 'Around' Notified Route: Orissa High Court NBFCs Cannot Use Force For Vehicle Repossession; Coercive Debt Recovery Violates Right To Livelihood Under Article 21: Uttarakhand High Court Non-Candidates Cannot Be Impleaded As Parties In Election Petitions Even If Allegations Of Impropriety Are Made: J&K&L High Court Lowest Bidder Has No Vested Right To Contract; Budgetary Constraints Valid Ground To Cancel Tender: Jharkhand High Court Confiscation Of Vehicle Under Section 49 Assam Forest Regulation Is Only Temporary; Final Confiscation Requires Conviction Under Section 51: Gauhati High Court Amendment Of Written Statement Cannot Be Allowed After Trial Commences If Facts Were Within Party's Knowledge: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Emphasizes Necessity of Predicate Offence for PMLA Charges

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court has laid down a pivotal legal principle concerning the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The court’s decision, centered around FIR No. 55/2023, underscored the critical role of a predicate offence in legitimizing PMLA charges.

The court’s observation, “The enforceability of PMLA offences hinges crucially on the existence of a predicate offence,” marks a significant moment in the interpretation and enforcement of money laundering regulations in India. This statement, forming the crux of the court’s verdict, provides much-needed clarity to a complex area of financial law.

Addressing the specific case, the court noted that while FIR No. 55/2023 remains a valid ‘scheduled offence’ under the PMLA, the investigations tied to the earlier FIRs Nos. 16/2018 and 49/2021, which had been compounded or quashed, were not sustainable under the PMLA framework. This distinction emphasizes the court’s stance that the legitimacy of PMLA charges is contingent upon the presence of a valid predicate offence.

As a result of this ruling, proceedings under PMLA related to the aforementioned FIRs against the petitioner were quashed, illustrating the court’s adherence to the foundational principles of PMLA.

Date : 24th November, 2023

RAJINDER SINGH CHADHA VS UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

Latest Legal News