138 NI Act | Admission Of Signatures On Cheque Triggers Statutory Presumption Of Debt: Punjab & Haryana HC Magistrate Cannot Straightaway Issue NBW For Non-Appearance If Accused Is Already On Bail; Bail Valid Until Cancelled: Orissa High Court Bank Cannot Dishonour Cheques Merely Because Account Title Changed From Partnership To Proprietorship: Madhya Pradesh High Court Environmental Clearance Is Site-Specific; Violations At Different Site By Related Entity Not Ground To Deny New EC: Kerala High Court Advocate’s Failure To Formally Prove Fee Bill Not Fatal To Claim If Oral Evidence Establishes Non-Payment Of Agreed Professional Fees: Delhi High Court Police Officers Cannot Fight Over Specific Postings; Disciplined Force Must Prioritize Public Interest Over Location: Karnataka High Court RERA Section 18 Interest For Delayed Possession Is An Unqualified Absolute Right; Notice Under Section 55 Contract Act Not Required: Bombay High Court State Cannot Hand Over Additional Charge Of Sensitive Posts To Tainted Officers Facing Disciplinary Action: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mandatory Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Essential If Accused Resides Outside Jurisdiction; Commercial Breach Not Criminal Offence: Calcutta High Court Disciplinary Enquiry Cannot Be Quashed Merely For Delay In Conclusion; 6-Month Timeline Under G.O.Ms.No.679 Is Directory: Andhra Pradesh High Court Exoneration In Adjudication Proceedings No Bar To Criminal Prosecution If CBI Collects Independent Evidence Of Forgery & Conspiracy: Bombay High Court Public Prosecutor Not A 'Post Office' Of Investigating Agency; Independent Application Of Mind Mandatory For Extending Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Complainant Cannot Use Section 311 CrPC To Reopen Pre-Charge Stage After Explicit Waiver & Framing Of Charges: Allahabad High Court Bomb Blast In Train Is An 'Accident' Under Railways Act, Union Of India Liable To Pay Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bail Hearing Can Proceed In Informant's Absence If Notice Was Served Despite Section 483(2) BNSS Mandate: Allahabad High Court

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petitioner’s Challenge, Upholds Debarment Order Over Sub-Standard Items in Mid Day Meal Kits

04 September 2024 10:46 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, presided by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad, upheld the debarment order against the Food and Beverage Foundation Society (the Petitioner) for supplying sub-standard items in dry ration kits under the Central Government’s Mid Day Meal Scheme. The decision was rendered on 25th July 2023.

The Petitioner had filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the debarment order issued by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi. The order, dated 14th February 2023, debarring the Petitioner from supplying Mid Day Meals under the PM POSHAN Scheme, came into effect after allegations of supplying rotten chana (gram) and vanaspati (dalda) instead of refined oil in one of the respondent’s schools.

The Court carefully examined the facts leading to the filing of the Writ Petition, including the contentions put forth by the Petitioner. It considered the claim made by the Petitioner that the chana might have rotted due to the passage of time and rainy season, leading to the alleged sub-standard supply. However, the Court found that there was no basis to doubt the receipts presented by the Respondent, showing supply in the month of August 2022. The Court observed that chana cannot rot in seven months, as claimed by the Petitioner.

Justice Prasad emphasized the importance of providing nutritious meals to children and remarked, “The seriousness of the allegations in the case at hand and its impact on children, who are the future of the country, cannot be overlooked.” He further rejected the Petitioner’s contention that Ministry of Education’s guidelines on oil and fat applied only to cooked meals, clarifying that they extended to all food items, including those supplied in dry ration kits.

While upholding the debarment order, the Court also pointed out that debarment could not be permanent and remanded the matter back to the Respondents to fix a specific timeline for the petitioner’s debarment from supplying Mid Day Meals. This decision aligns with previous judicial precedents that emphasized the necessity for a reasonable duration for debarment and highlighted its adverse consequences on the debarred entity.

The Court concluded its judgment, underscoring the significance of adhering to the guidelines and norms of the Mid Day Meal Scheme to ensure the welfare and health of children. It further urged the competent authority to establish transparent and fair guidelines for debarment periods to prevent arbitrariness in such decisions.

Date of Decision: 25th JULY, 2023

SECRETARY, FOOD AND BEVERAGE FOUNDATION SOCIETY REGD. vs  DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Latest Legal News