Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petitioner’s Challenge, Upholds Debarment Order Over Sub-Standard Items in Mid Day Meal Kits

04 September 2024 10:46 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, presided by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad, upheld the debarment order against the Food and Beverage Foundation Society (the Petitioner) for supplying sub-standard items in dry ration kits under the Central Government’s Mid Day Meal Scheme. The decision was rendered on 25th July 2023.

The Petitioner had filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the debarment order issued by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi. The order, dated 14th February 2023, debarring the Petitioner from supplying Mid Day Meals under the PM POSHAN Scheme, came into effect after allegations of supplying rotten chana (gram) and vanaspati (dalda) instead of refined oil in one of the respondent’s schools.

The Court carefully examined the facts leading to the filing of the Writ Petition, including the contentions put forth by the Petitioner. It considered the claim made by the Petitioner that the chana might have rotted due to the passage of time and rainy season, leading to the alleged sub-standard supply. However, the Court found that there was no basis to doubt the receipts presented by the Respondent, showing supply in the month of August 2022. The Court observed that chana cannot rot in seven months, as claimed by the Petitioner.

Justice Prasad emphasized the importance of providing nutritious meals to children and remarked, “The seriousness of the allegations in the case at hand and its impact on children, who are the future of the country, cannot be overlooked.” He further rejected the Petitioner’s contention that Ministry of Education’s guidelines on oil and fat applied only to cooked meals, clarifying that they extended to all food items, including those supplied in dry ration kits.

While upholding the debarment order, the Court also pointed out that debarment could not be permanent and remanded the matter back to the Respondents to fix a specific timeline for the petitioner’s debarment from supplying Mid Day Meals. This decision aligns with previous judicial precedents that emphasized the necessity for a reasonable duration for debarment and highlighted its adverse consequences on the debarred entity.

The Court concluded its judgment, underscoring the significance of adhering to the guidelines and norms of the Mid Day Meal Scheme to ensure the welfare and health of children. It further urged the competent authority to establish transparent and fair guidelines for debarment periods to prevent arbitrariness in such decisions.

Date of Decision: 25th JULY, 2023

SECRETARY, FOOD AND BEVERAGE FOUNDATION SOCIETY REGD. vs  DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Latest Legal News