"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petitioner’s Challenge, Upholds Debarment Order Over Sub-Standard Items in Mid Day Meal Kits

04 September 2024 10:46 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, presided by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad, upheld the debarment order against the Food and Beverage Foundation Society (the Petitioner) for supplying sub-standard items in dry ration kits under the Central Government’s Mid Day Meal Scheme. The decision was rendered on 25th July 2023.

The Petitioner had filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the debarment order issued by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi. The order, dated 14th February 2023, debarring the Petitioner from supplying Mid Day Meals under the PM POSHAN Scheme, came into effect after allegations of supplying rotten chana (gram) and vanaspati (dalda) instead of refined oil in one of the respondent’s schools.

The Court carefully examined the facts leading to the filing of the Writ Petition, including the contentions put forth by the Petitioner. It considered the claim made by the Petitioner that the chana might have rotted due to the passage of time and rainy season, leading to the alleged sub-standard supply. However, the Court found that there was no basis to doubt the receipts presented by the Respondent, showing supply in the month of August 2022. The Court observed that chana cannot rot in seven months, as claimed by the Petitioner.

Justice Prasad emphasized the importance of providing nutritious meals to children and remarked, “The seriousness of the allegations in the case at hand and its impact on children, who are the future of the country, cannot be overlooked.” He further rejected the Petitioner’s contention that Ministry of Education’s guidelines on oil and fat applied only to cooked meals, clarifying that they extended to all food items, including those supplied in dry ration kits.

While upholding the debarment order, the Court also pointed out that debarment could not be permanent and remanded the matter back to the Respondents to fix a specific timeline for the petitioner’s debarment from supplying Mid Day Meals. This decision aligns with previous judicial precedents that emphasized the necessity for a reasonable duration for debarment and highlighted its adverse consequences on the debarred entity.

The Court concluded its judgment, underscoring the significance of adhering to the guidelines and norms of the Mid Day Meal Scheme to ensure the welfare and health of children. It further urged the competent authority to establish transparent and fair guidelines for debarment periods to prevent arbitrariness in such decisions.

Date of Decision: 25th JULY, 2023

SECRETARY, FOOD AND BEVERAGE FOUNDATION SOCIETY REGD. vs  DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Similar News