Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Air Ticket Cancellation Fraud, Upholds Criminal Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition filed by Blue Bird Leisure and Holidays Ltd. & Others, seeking to quash an FIR registered against them under Sections 406/120B of the IPC. The FIR pertained to allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust in the context of the cancellation of air tickets. The judgment, pronounced by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on February 2, 2024, emphasized the prima facie criminal nature of the conduct of the petitioners.

The petition challenged an order dated 07.06.2013 by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-05, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, which directed the registration of an FIR based on a complaint by Spring Holiday Ltd., alleging fraudulent cancellation of air tickets by the petitioners after payment was received. The petitioners sought the quashing of the consequent FIR, arguing that the dispute was essentially civil in nature, arising from a contractual relationship.

Justice Amit Sharma, in his judgment, observed, “The aforesaid aspect, as highlighted hereinabove, shows that even as per the petitioners’ own case, as on 27.09.2012, they were not authorized to book any tickets by M/s Ezeego. The scope of the present jurisdiction is limited in nature and disputed facts which require minute scrutiny cannot be gone into, at this stage.” This observation was crucial in determining the criminal aspect of the case.

The court also noted that the petitioners had no authority to book tickets for the complainant and that the amount received was never refunded. The judge remarked, “There appears to be prima facie substance in the allegations made against the petitioners.”

Rejecting the contentions of the petitioners, the court upheld the FIR and the consequent chargesheet, directing an expedited trial. The court clarified that the observations made were solely for the purpose of adjudicating the present petition and should not be construed as an opinion on the merits of the case.

Date of Decision: 02nd February, 2024

Blue Bird Leisure And Holidays Ltd. & Ors.  VS Spring Holiday Ltd. & Anr.                                         

 

Latest Legal News