Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Air Ticket Cancellation Fraud, Upholds Criminal Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition filed by Blue Bird Leisure and Holidays Ltd. & Others, seeking to quash an FIR registered against them under Sections 406/120B of the IPC. The FIR pertained to allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust in the context of the cancellation of air tickets. The judgment, pronounced by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on February 2, 2024, emphasized the prima facie criminal nature of the conduct of the petitioners.

The petition challenged an order dated 07.06.2013 by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-05, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, which directed the registration of an FIR based on a complaint by Spring Holiday Ltd., alleging fraudulent cancellation of air tickets by the petitioners after payment was received. The petitioners sought the quashing of the consequent FIR, arguing that the dispute was essentially civil in nature, arising from a contractual relationship.

Justice Amit Sharma, in his judgment, observed, “The aforesaid aspect, as highlighted hereinabove, shows that even as per the petitioners’ own case, as on 27.09.2012, they were not authorized to book any tickets by M/s Ezeego. The scope of the present jurisdiction is limited in nature and disputed facts which require minute scrutiny cannot be gone into, at this stage.” This observation was crucial in determining the criminal aspect of the case.

The court also noted that the petitioners had no authority to book tickets for the complainant and that the amount received was never refunded. The judge remarked, “There appears to be prima facie substance in the allegations made against the petitioners.”

Rejecting the contentions of the petitioners, the court upheld the FIR and the consequent chargesheet, directing an expedited trial. The court clarified that the observations made were solely for the purpose of adjudicating the present petition and should not be construed as an opinion on the merits of the case.

Date of Decision: 02nd February, 2024

Blue Bird Leisure And Holidays Ltd. & Ors.  VS Spring Holiday Ltd. & Anr.                                         

 

Latest Legal News