Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

Delhi High Court Allows Exclusion of Father's Name from Minor's Passport in Single Parent Custody

03 September 2024 10:08 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has affirmed the validity of an Office Memorandum (OM) issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, allowing the exclusion of the father's name from the passport of a minor child in cases of single parent custody. The judgment, delivered by Justice Prathiba M. Singh, emphasized the need for a case-by-case assessment of passport applications for minors in various circumstances arising from matrimonial discord between parents.

The OM, dated February 28, 2023, clarified that the term "single parent" should not be limited to unwed parents and extended to all situations where the father has no contact with the mother or the child, including cases of divorce or separation. The court held that the language used in the OM and the Passport Manual was clear, allowing for the exclusion of the father's name when warranted.

The ruling drew attention to previous judgments, including the cases of Shalu Nigam v. The Regional Passport Officer and Kavneet Kaur v. Regional Passport Office, which recognized the rights of a single parent to exclude the father's name from the passport if it is not legally required. The court stressed that there is no one-size-fits-all approach, and each case should be examined on its merits.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh highlighted that the circumstances in the present case were peculiar, as the father had disowned the child and had no visitation rights. The minor child also used the surname of the mother and maternal grandparents. In light of these facts, the court directed the exclusion of the father's name from the minor child's passport.

Date: April 19, 2023

SMITA MAAN AND ANR. VS REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER 

Latest Legal News