Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

Delhi High Court Allows Exclusion of Father's Name from Minor's Passport in Single Parent Custody

03 September 2024 10:08 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has affirmed the validity of an Office Memorandum (OM) issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, allowing the exclusion of the father's name from the passport of a minor child in cases of single parent custody. The judgment, delivered by Justice Prathiba M. Singh, emphasized the need for a case-by-case assessment of passport applications for minors in various circumstances arising from matrimonial discord between parents.

The OM, dated February 28, 2023, clarified that the term "single parent" should not be limited to unwed parents and extended to all situations where the father has no contact with the mother or the child, including cases of divorce or separation. The court held that the language used in the OM and the Passport Manual was clear, allowing for the exclusion of the father's name when warranted.

The ruling drew attention to previous judgments, including the cases of Shalu Nigam v. The Regional Passport Officer and Kavneet Kaur v. Regional Passport Office, which recognized the rights of a single parent to exclude the father's name from the passport if it is not legally required. The court stressed that there is no one-size-fits-all approach, and each case should be examined on its merits.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh highlighted that the circumstances in the present case were peculiar, as the father had disowned the child and had no visitation rights. The minor child also used the surname of the mother and maternal grandparents. In light of these facts, the court directed the exclusion of the father's name from the minor child's passport.

Date: April 19, 2023

SMITA MAAN AND ANR. VS REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER 

Latest Legal News