MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Delhi High Court Allows Exclusion of Father's Name from Minor's Passport in Single Parent Custody

03 September 2024 10:08 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has affirmed the validity of an Office Memorandum (OM) issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, allowing the exclusion of the father's name from the passport of a minor child in cases of single parent custody. The judgment, delivered by Justice Prathiba M. Singh, emphasized the need for a case-by-case assessment of passport applications for minors in various circumstances arising from matrimonial discord between parents.

The OM, dated February 28, 2023, clarified that the term "single parent" should not be limited to unwed parents and extended to all situations where the father has no contact with the mother or the child, including cases of divorce or separation. The court held that the language used in the OM and the Passport Manual was clear, allowing for the exclusion of the father's name when warranted.

The ruling drew attention to previous judgments, including the cases of Shalu Nigam v. The Regional Passport Officer and Kavneet Kaur v. Regional Passport Office, which recognized the rights of a single parent to exclude the father's name from the passport if it is not legally required. The court stressed that there is no one-size-fits-all approach, and each case should be examined on its merits.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh highlighted that the circumstances in the present case were peculiar, as the father had disowned the child and had no visitation rights. The minor child also used the surname of the mother and maternal grandparents. In light of these facts, the court directed the exclusion of the father's name from the minor child's passport.

Date: April 19, 2023

SMITA MAAN AND ANR. VS REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER 

Latest Legal News