138 NI Act | Admission Of Signatures On Cheque Triggers Statutory Presumption Of Debt: Punjab & Haryana HC Magistrate Cannot Straightaway Issue NBW For Non-Appearance If Accused Is Already On Bail; Bail Valid Until Cancelled: Orissa High Court Bank Cannot Dishonour Cheques Merely Because Account Title Changed From Partnership To Proprietorship: Madhya Pradesh High Court Environmental Clearance Is Site-Specific; Violations At Different Site By Related Entity Not Ground To Deny New EC: Kerala High Court Advocate’s Failure To Formally Prove Fee Bill Not Fatal To Claim If Oral Evidence Establishes Non-Payment Of Agreed Professional Fees: Delhi High Court Police Officers Cannot Fight Over Specific Postings; Disciplined Force Must Prioritize Public Interest Over Location: Karnataka High Court RERA Section 18 Interest For Delayed Possession Is An Unqualified Absolute Right; Notice Under Section 55 Contract Act Not Required: Bombay High Court State Cannot Hand Over Additional Charge Of Sensitive Posts To Tainted Officers Facing Disciplinary Action: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mandatory Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Essential If Accused Resides Outside Jurisdiction; Commercial Breach Not Criminal Offence: Calcutta High Court Disciplinary Enquiry Cannot Be Quashed Merely For Delay In Conclusion; 6-Month Timeline Under G.O.Ms.No.679 Is Directory: Andhra Pradesh High Court Exoneration In Adjudication Proceedings No Bar To Criminal Prosecution If CBI Collects Independent Evidence Of Forgery & Conspiracy: Bombay High Court Public Prosecutor Not A 'Post Office' Of Investigating Agency; Independent Application Of Mind Mandatory For Extending Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Complainant Cannot Use Section 311 CrPC To Reopen Pre-Charge Stage After Explicit Waiver & Framing Of Charges: Allahabad High Court Bomb Blast In Train Is An 'Accident' Under Railways Act, Union Of India Liable To Pay Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bail Hearing Can Proceed In Informant's Absence If Notice Was Served Despite Section 483(2) BNSS Mandate: Allahabad High Court

Delhi High Court Allows Exclusion of Father's Name from Minor's Passport in Single Parent Custody

03 September 2024 10:08 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has affirmed the validity of an Office Memorandum (OM) issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, allowing the exclusion of the father's name from the passport of a minor child in cases of single parent custody. The judgment, delivered by Justice Prathiba M. Singh, emphasized the need for a case-by-case assessment of passport applications for minors in various circumstances arising from matrimonial discord between parents.

The OM, dated February 28, 2023, clarified that the term "single parent" should not be limited to unwed parents and extended to all situations where the father has no contact with the mother or the child, including cases of divorce or separation. The court held that the language used in the OM and the Passport Manual was clear, allowing for the exclusion of the father's name when warranted.

The ruling drew attention to previous judgments, including the cases of Shalu Nigam v. The Regional Passport Officer and Kavneet Kaur v. Regional Passport Office, which recognized the rights of a single parent to exclude the father's name from the passport if it is not legally required. The court stressed that there is no one-size-fits-all approach, and each case should be examined on its merits.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh highlighted that the circumstances in the present case were peculiar, as the father had disowned the child and had no visitation rights. The minor child also used the surname of the mother and maternal grandparents. In light of these facts, the court directed the exclusion of the father's name from the minor child's passport.

Date: April 19, 2023

SMITA MAAN AND ANR. VS REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER 

Latest Legal News