"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Delhi High Court Affirms No Cap on Pension Benefits for Senior Widows and Widowers”

28 August 2024 1:36 PM

By: sayum


Court closes PIL, recognizing GNCTD’s comprehensive support systems and unlimited beneficiary access. In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court has closed the public interest litigation (PIL) regarding the management of pension schemes for senior widows and widowers, following a comprehensive counter affidavit filed by the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD). The court, comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, concluded that no further orders are required as the existing measures are deemed sufficient.

The case originated from a letter dated 15th September 2022, written by Mr. Ravinder Raj, Advocate, highlighting the difficulties faced by senior widows and widowers. This letter was treated as a PIL by the High Court, prompting a review of the financial assistance schemes managed by the GNCTD.

The court reviewed the GNCTD’s counter affidavit, which detailed the management of pension schemes by two departments: the Department of Women and Child Development and the Department of Social Welfare.

Delhi Pension Scheme to Women in Distress: This scheme provides Rs. 2,500 per month to widows, divorced, separated, abandoned, deserted, or destitute women, ensuring social security for those without adequate means of subsistence.

Financial Assistance for Marriage of Daughters of Poor Widows and Orphan Girls: Aims to support the marriage of daughters of poor widows and orphan girls with financial assistance of Rs. 30,000 for up to two daughters.

Old Age Assistance (Popularly Known as Old Age Pension): This scheme provides financial assistance to elderly individuals above 60 years of age residing in Delhi, with specific criteria ensuring that the aid reaches the needy.

Justice Manmohan noted, “The detailed affidavit provided by the GNCTD demonstrates that adequate measures are in place to address the financial needs of senior widows, widowers, and other vulnerable populations.”

The court’s reasoning was based on the extensive details provided in the counter affidavit, which outlined the eligibility criteria, application processes, and the financial mechanisms ensuring the disbursement of assistance. The court found that the schemes effectively address the financial insecurities of the targeted beneficiaries and that there are no capping or limitations on the number of beneficiaries.

The Delhi High Court’s decision to close the petition underscores the adequacy of the current financial assistance frameworks for senior widows and widowers in Delhi. By acknowledging the efforts and detailed plans of the GNCTD, the court reinforced the importance of systematic support for vulnerable populations. This judgment is expected to assure beneficiaries of continued support and streamline future initiatives aimed at social welfare.

Date of Decision: 29th July, 2024

COURT ITS OWN MOTION  VS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Similar News