MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Delhi High Court Affirms No Cap on Pension Benefits for Senior Widows and Widowers”

28 August 2024 1:36 PM

By: sayum


Court closes PIL, recognizing GNCTD’s comprehensive support systems and unlimited beneficiary access. In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court has closed the public interest litigation (PIL) regarding the management of pension schemes for senior widows and widowers, following a comprehensive counter affidavit filed by the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD). The court, comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, concluded that no further orders are required as the existing measures are deemed sufficient.

The case originated from a letter dated 15th September 2022, written by Mr. Ravinder Raj, Advocate, highlighting the difficulties faced by senior widows and widowers. This letter was treated as a PIL by the High Court, prompting a review of the financial assistance schemes managed by the GNCTD.

The court reviewed the GNCTD’s counter affidavit, which detailed the management of pension schemes by two departments: the Department of Women and Child Development and the Department of Social Welfare.

Delhi Pension Scheme to Women in Distress: This scheme provides Rs. 2,500 per month to widows, divorced, separated, abandoned, deserted, or destitute women, ensuring social security for those without adequate means of subsistence.

Financial Assistance for Marriage of Daughters of Poor Widows and Orphan Girls: Aims to support the marriage of daughters of poor widows and orphan girls with financial assistance of Rs. 30,000 for up to two daughters.

Old Age Assistance (Popularly Known as Old Age Pension): This scheme provides financial assistance to elderly individuals above 60 years of age residing in Delhi, with specific criteria ensuring that the aid reaches the needy.

Justice Manmohan noted, “The detailed affidavit provided by the GNCTD demonstrates that adequate measures are in place to address the financial needs of senior widows, widowers, and other vulnerable populations.”

The court’s reasoning was based on the extensive details provided in the counter affidavit, which outlined the eligibility criteria, application processes, and the financial mechanisms ensuring the disbursement of assistance. The court found that the schemes effectively address the financial insecurities of the targeted beneficiaries and that there are no capping or limitations on the number of beneficiaries.

The Delhi High Court’s decision to close the petition underscores the adequacy of the current financial assistance frameworks for senior widows and widowers in Delhi. By acknowledging the efforts and detailed plans of the GNCTD, the court reinforced the importance of systematic support for vulnerable populations. This judgment is expected to assure beneficiaries of continued support and streamline future initiatives aimed at social welfare.

Date of Decision: 29th July, 2024

COURT ITS OWN MOTION  VS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Latest Legal News