Married Daughter Cannot Be Excluded From Compassionate Appointment Solely On The Ground Of Marriage: Chhattisgarh High Court Allahabad HC Condemns Lawyers Seeking Adjournments To Attend District Courts Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Of Restitution Exists: Calcutta High Court Invoke Preventive Detention Laws Against Sand Mining Kingpins: Supreme Court Directs ED Probe To Protect Chambal Sanctuary Res Judicata Bars Pendente Lite Purchaser From Re-Agitating Impleadment Under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC If Rejected Under Order I Rule 10: Supreme Court Consumer Complaints Can Continue Against Promoters & Co-Developers Even If Corporate Debtor Is Under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court IBC Moratorium Protects Only Corporate Debtor, Does Not Bar Consumer Complaints Against Promoters & Directors: Supreme Court Vehicle Registration Certificate Relevant But Not Conclusive For Deciding Interim Custody Under Section 451 CrPC: Supreme Court Lawyer Has No Unqualified Right To Continuous Presence During Entire Interrogation Under Section 38 BNSS: Supreme Court Mandating Continuous Videography Of Accused During Transit Is Unworkable, May Lead To Unfounded Allegations: Supreme Court Centre Introduces FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: Proposes Vesting Of Defunct NGO Assets In 'Designated Authority', Mandates Prior Nod For Probe Written Communication Of Grounds Of Arrest Not Mandatory For Arrests Prior To SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Judgment: Orissa High Court Passing Ex-Parte Maintenance Order Without Verifying Status Of WhatsApp Or Email Notice Violates Natural Justice: Madhya Pradesh High Court Training ChatGPT On Copyrighted News Is 'Fair Dealing', Does Not Amount To Infringement: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enjoin OpenAI Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rethinking Access to Justice: Proposing a Client-Choice Bar-Integrated Model as a Viable Alternative to the LADC System Delhi Police Grants Permission To Advocates To Protest At Jantar Mantar On August 7 Over LADC Concerns Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Delhi High Court Affirms No Cap on Pension Benefits for Senior Widows and Widowers”

28 August 2024 1:36 PM

By: sayum


Court closes PIL, recognizing GNCTD’s comprehensive support systems and unlimited beneficiary access. In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court has closed the public interest litigation (PIL) regarding the management of pension schemes for senior widows and widowers, following a comprehensive counter affidavit filed by the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD). The court, comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, concluded that no further orders are required as the existing measures are deemed sufficient.

The case originated from a letter dated 15th September 2022, written by Mr. Ravinder Raj, Advocate, highlighting the difficulties faced by senior widows and widowers. This letter was treated as a PIL by the High Court, prompting a review of the financial assistance schemes managed by the GNCTD.

The court reviewed the GNCTD’s counter affidavit, which detailed the management of pension schemes by two departments: the Department of Women and Child Development and the Department of Social Welfare.

Delhi Pension Scheme to Women in Distress: This scheme provides Rs. 2,500 per month to widows, divorced, separated, abandoned, deserted, or destitute women, ensuring social security for those without adequate means of subsistence.

Financial Assistance for Marriage of Daughters of Poor Widows and Orphan Girls: Aims to support the marriage of daughters of poor widows and orphan girls with financial assistance of Rs. 30,000 for up to two daughters.

Old Age Assistance (Popularly Known as Old Age Pension): This scheme provides financial assistance to elderly individuals above 60 years of age residing in Delhi, with specific criteria ensuring that the aid reaches the needy.

Justice Manmohan noted, “The detailed affidavit provided by the GNCTD demonstrates that adequate measures are in place to address the financial needs of senior widows, widowers, and other vulnerable populations.”

The court’s reasoning was based on the extensive details provided in the counter affidavit, which outlined the eligibility criteria, application processes, and the financial mechanisms ensuring the disbursement of assistance. The court found that the schemes effectively address the financial insecurities of the targeted beneficiaries and that there are no capping or limitations on the number of beneficiaries.

The Delhi High Court’s decision to close the petition underscores the adequacy of the current financial assistance frameworks for senior widows and widowers in Delhi. By acknowledging the efforts and detailed plans of the GNCTD, the court reinforced the importance of systematic support for vulnerable populations. This judgment is expected to assure beneficiaries of continued support and streamline future initiatives aimed at social welfare.

Date of Decision: 29th July, 2024

COURT ITS OWN MOTION  VS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Latest Legal News