UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Delhi High Court Acts on Tragic Healthcare Lapses: Constitutes Expert Committee to Overhaul Medical Infrastructure

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move addressing the chronic inadequacies in Delhi's healthcare system, the Delhi High Court, led by the Acting Chief Justice and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, has taken a suo moto cognizance of the matter, constituting an expert committee to suggest critical reforms. This decision comes in the backdrop of multiple incidents highlighting the acute lack of medical services in the capital, including the recent tragic death of Mr. Pramod due to the denial of medical treatment by several hospitals.

The court's intervention primarily addresses the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which encompasses the right to receive timely and adequate medical care. The judgment focuses on the State's obligation under Article 47 to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and to improve public health.

The court's attention was drawn to the dire state of healthcare following the case of Mr. Pramod, who was refused treatment by four hospitals. His case is not isolated, as it reflects a broader pattern of insufficient medical infrastructure, including a lack of ICU beds, non-functional medical equipment, and understaffing in hospitals across Delhi.

The court critically assessed the submissions and reports from the GNCTD's Health Minister and Health Secretary. It noted the bureaucratic challenges and discrepancies in the management of healthcare services. The issues of prolonged wait times, unavailability of critical equipment like CT Scan machines, and the non-adherence to instructions by the Health Minister were highlighted. The court also acknowledged the existing vacancies in various medical positions, which contribute to the systemic inadequacy.

In response to these challenges, the Delhi High Court has established an expert committee to recommend measures for optimizing resources, ensuring the availability of critical infrastructure and manpower, and improving the overall quality of medical services in Delhi. The committee, comprising eminent medical experts, will submit a report with concrete recommendations. This proactive approach by the court aims to bridge the gaps in Delhi's healthcare system and ensure the right to life is upheld.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2024

Court on its own motion vs Union of India and Ors

Latest Legal News