Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Delhi High Court Acts on Tragic Healthcare Lapses: Constitutes Expert Committee to Overhaul Medical Infrastructure

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move addressing the chronic inadequacies in Delhi's healthcare system, the Delhi High Court, led by the Acting Chief Justice and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, has taken a suo moto cognizance of the matter, constituting an expert committee to suggest critical reforms. This decision comes in the backdrop of multiple incidents highlighting the acute lack of medical services in the capital, including the recent tragic death of Mr. Pramod due to the denial of medical treatment by several hospitals.

The court's intervention primarily addresses the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which encompasses the right to receive timely and adequate medical care. The judgment focuses on the State's obligation under Article 47 to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and to improve public health.

The court's attention was drawn to the dire state of healthcare following the case of Mr. Pramod, who was refused treatment by four hospitals. His case is not isolated, as it reflects a broader pattern of insufficient medical infrastructure, including a lack of ICU beds, non-functional medical equipment, and understaffing in hospitals across Delhi.

The court critically assessed the submissions and reports from the GNCTD's Health Minister and Health Secretary. It noted the bureaucratic challenges and discrepancies in the management of healthcare services. The issues of prolonged wait times, unavailability of critical equipment like CT Scan machines, and the non-adherence to instructions by the Health Minister were highlighted. The court also acknowledged the existing vacancies in various medical positions, which contribute to the systemic inadequacy.

In response to these challenges, the Delhi High Court has established an expert committee to recommend measures for optimizing resources, ensuring the availability of critical infrastructure and manpower, and improving the overall quality of medical services in Delhi. The committee, comprising eminent medical experts, will submit a report with concrete recommendations. This proactive approach by the court aims to bridge the gaps in Delhi's healthcare system and ensure the right to life is upheld.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2024

Court on its own motion vs Union of India and Ors

Latest Legal News