Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Delhi High Court Acts on Tragic Healthcare Lapses: Constitutes Expert Committee to Overhaul Medical Infrastructure

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move addressing the chronic inadequacies in Delhi's healthcare system, the Delhi High Court, led by the Acting Chief Justice and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, has taken a suo moto cognizance of the matter, constituting an expert committee to suggest critical reforms. This decision comes in the backdrop of multiple incidents highlighting the acute lack of medical services in the capital, including the recent tragic death of Mr. Pramod due to the denial of medical treatment by several hospitals.

The court's intervention primarily addresses the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which encompasses the right to receive timely and adequate medical care. The judgment focuses on the State's obligation under Article 47 to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and to improve public health.

The court's attention was drawn to the dire state of healthcare following the case of Mr. Pramod, who was refused treatment by four hospitals. His case is not isolated, as it reflects a broader pattern of insufficient medical infrastructure, including a lack of ICU beds, non-functional medical equipment, and understaffing in hospitals across Delhi.

The court critically assessed the submissions and reports from the GNCTD's Health Minister and Health Secretary. It noted the bureaucratic challenges and discrepancies in the management of healthcare services. The issues of prolonged wait times, unavailability of critical equipment like CT Scan machines, and the non-adherence to instructions by the Health Minister were highlighted. The court also acknowledged the existing vacancies in various medical positions, which contribute to the systemic inadequacy.

In response to these challenges, the Delhi High Court has established an expert committee to recommend measures for optimizing resources, ensuring the availability of critical infrastructure and manpower, and improving the overall quality of medical services in Delhi. The committee, comprising eminent medical experts, will submit a report with concrete recommendations. This proactive approach by the court aims to bridge the gaps in Delhi's healthcare system and ensure the right to life is upheld.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2024

Court on its own motion vs Union of India and Ors

Latest Legal News