Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Delhi High Court Acts on Tragic Healthcare Lapses: Constitutes Expert Committee to Overhaul Medical Infrastructure

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move addressing the chronic inadequacies in Delhi's healthcare system, the Delhi High Court, led by the Acting Chief Justice and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, has taken a suo moto cognizance of the matter, constituting an expert committee to suggest critical reforms. This decision comes in the backdrop of multiple incidents highlighting the acute lack of medical services in the capital, including the recent tragic death of Mr. Pramod due to the denial of medical treatment by several hospitals.

The court's intervention primarily addresses the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which encompasses the right to receive timely and adequate medical care. The judgment focuses on the State's obligation under Article 47 to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and to improve public health.

The court's attention was drawn to the dire state of healthcare following the case of Mr. Pramod, who was refused treatment by four hospitals. His case is not isolated, as it reflects a broader pattern of insufficient medical infrastructure, including a lack of ICU beds, non-functional medical equipment, and understaffing in hospitals across Delhi.

The court critically assessed the submissions and reports from the GNCTD's Health Minister and Health Secretary. It noted the bureaucratic challenges and discrepancies in the management of healthcare services. The issues of prolonged wait times, unavailability of critical equipment like CT Scan machines, and the non-adherence to instructions by the Health Minister were highlighted. The court also acknowledged the existing vacancies in various medical positions, which contribute to the systemic inadequacy.

In response to these challenges, the Delhi High Court has established an expert committee to recommend measures for optimizing resources, ensuring the availability of critical infrastructure and manpower, and improving the overall quality of medical services in Delhi. The committee, comprising eminent medical experts, will submit a report with concrete recommendations. This proactive approach by the court aims to bridge the gaps in Delhi's healthcare system and ensure the right to life is upheld.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2024

Court on its own motion vs Union of India and Ors

Latest Legal News