Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Delhi HC Quashes JNU’s Decision to Cancel Ph.D Candidature, Emphasizes Compliance with University Ordinances

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court today quashed the decision of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) to cancel the Ph.D candidature of Nazar Mohamed Mohaideen S., underscoring the importance of adhering to university ordinances and statutes.

The Court focused on the legal issue surrounding the discontinuation of a Ph.D scholar’s candidature contrary to the university’s statutes and ordinances. The core question revolved around the university’s adherence to its own regulations in assigning supervisors to Ph.D scholars.

The petitioner, a Ph.D scholar at JNU, faced issues with his supervisor, leading to a request for a change in supervision under Ordinance 6.6. The dispute escalated, resulting in the university’s decision to cancel the petitioner’s candidature, alleging non-availability of an alternative supervisor. The petitioner challenged this decision, asserting that JNU failed to follow its ordinances in managing the supervision arrangement.

The Court meticulously analyzed the university’s ordinances, particularly Ordinance 6.1 (appointment of research supervisors) and Ordinance 10 (grounds for cancellation of Ph.D candidature). It was noted that the JNU had deviated from these statutes, leading to an improper decision-making process. The Court emphasized that university practices must align with its governing rules and rejected the notion that ‘past practices’ could override explicit statutory provisions.

The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order dated October 4, 2023, thereby reinstating the petitioner as a Ph.D scholar. It directed JNU to assign a new supervisor within two weeks, adhering to its ordinances. The Court also conditionally permitted the petitioner to continue under the supervision of Prof. Shailja Singh, provided he maintains appropriate conduct.

Date of Decision: 15th February 2024

NAZAR MOHAMED MOHAIDEEN vs. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ANR.

Similar News