Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Delhi HC Quashes JNU’s Decision to Cancel Ph.D Candidature, Emphasizes Compliance with University Ordinances

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court today quashed the decision of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) to cancel the Ph.D candidature of Nazar Mohamed Mohaideen S., underscoring the importance of adhering to university ordinances and statutes.

The Court focused on the legal issue surrounding the discontinuation of a Ph.D scholar’s candidature contrary to the university’s statutes and ordinances. The core question revolved around the university’s adherence to its own regulations in assigning supervisors to Ph.D scholars.

The petitioner, a Ph.D scholar at JNU, faced issues with his supervisor, leading to a request for a change in supervision under Ordinance 6.6. The dispute escalated, resulting in the university’s decision to cancel the petitioner’s candidature, alleging non-availability of an alternative supervisor. The petitioner challenged this decision, asserting that JNU failed to follow its ordinances in managing the supervision arrangement.

The Court meticulously analyzed the university’s ordinances, particularly Ordinance 6.1 (appointment of research supervisors) and Ordinance 10 (grounds for cancellation of Ph.D candidature). It was noted that the JNU had deviated from these statutes, leading to an improper decision-making process. The Court emphasized that university practices must align with its governing rules and rejected the notion that ‘past practices’ could override explicit statutory provisions.

The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order dated October 4, 2023, thereby reinstating the petitioner as a Ph.D scholar. It directed JNU to assign a new supervisor within two weeks, adhering to its ordinances. The Court also conditionally permitted the petitioner to continue under the supervision of Prof. Shailja Singh, provided he maintains appropriate conduct.

Date of Decision: 15th February 2024

NAZAR MOHAMED MOHAIDEEN vs. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ANR.

Latest Legal News