Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Delhi HC Quashes JNU’s Decision to Cancel Ph.D Candidature, Emphasizes Compliance with University Ordinances

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court today quashed the decision of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) to cancel the Ph.D candidature of Nazar Mohamed Mohaideen S., underscoring the importance of adhering to university ordinances and statutes.

The Court focused on the legal issue surrounding the discontinuation of a Ph.D scholar’s candidature contrary to the university’s statutes and ordinances. The core question revolved around the university’s adherence to its own regulations in assigning supervisors to Ph.D scholars.

The petitioner, a Ph.D scholar at JNU, faced issues with his supervisor, leading to a request for a change in supervision under Ordinance 6.6. The dispute escalated, resulting in the university’s decision to cancel the petitioner’s candidature, alleging non-availability of an alternative supervisor. The petitioner challenged this decision, asserting that JNU failed to follow its ordinances in managing the supervision arrangement.

The Court meticulously analyzed the university’s ordinances, particularly Ordinance 6.1 (appointment of research supervisors) and Ordinance 10 (grounds for cancellation of Ph.D candidature). It was noted that the JNU had deviated from these statutes, leading to an improper decision-making process. The Court emphasized that university practices must align with its governing rules and rejected the notion that ‘past practices’ could override explicit statutory provisions.

The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order dated October 4, 2023, thereby reinstating the petitioner as a Ph.D scholar. It directed JNU to assign a new supervisor within two weeks, adhering to its ordinances. The Court also conditionally permitted the petitioner to continue under the supervision of Prof. Shailja Singh, provided he maintains appropriate conduct.

Date of Decision: 15th February 2024

NAZAR MOHAMED MOHAIDEEN vs. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ANR.

Latest Legal News