Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Defense Rights Extend to Pre-Charge Stage – Summon Record Can be Summoned: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana delivered a landmark judgment, emphasizing the rights of the defense in the pre-charge stage of criminal cases. The court quashed an earlier decision of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, in the case involving Ashok Kumar and the State of Punjab.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the matter, made a pivotal observation, stating, “The court is not debarred from summoning or relying upon material of sterling quality even if such document is not a part of the charge sheet.” This remark underscores the court’s acknowledgment of the defense’s rights to invoke Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. at the initial stage of framing charges, provided there is compelling material that could influence the case’s direction.

The revision petition filed by Ashok Kumar contested the dismissal of his application, which sought to summon records pertaining to the alleged recovery of 1170 tablets under Batch No.CLE 2001. The case, which began with allegations under the PNDT Act, later expanded to include charges under the NDPS Act and IPC.

This judgment brings into focus the crucial aspect of judicial scrutiny at the pre-charge stage in criminal proceedings. The High Court’s decision to remand the matter for fresh adjudication reflects a progressive approach towards ensuring that justice is served by considering all pertinent materials and not just those initially presented.

Date of Decision: 24.11.2023

ASHOK KUMAR VS STATE OF PUNJAB

Latest Legal News