No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Defense Rights Extend to Pre-Charge Stage – Summon Record Can be Summoned: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana delivered a landmark judgment, emphasizing the rights of the defense in the pre-charge stage of criminal cases. The court quashed an earlier decision of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, in the case involving Ashok Kumar and the State of Punjab.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the matter, made a pivotal observation, stating, “The court is not debarred from summoning or relying upon material of sterling quality even if such document is not a part of the charge sheet.” This remark underscores the court’s acknowledgment of the defense’s rights to invoke Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. at the initial stage of framing charges, provided there is compelling material that could influence the case’s direction.

The revision petition filed by Ashok Kumar contested the dismissal of his application, which sought to summon records pertaining to the alleged recovery of 1170 tablets under Batch No.CLE 2001. The case, which began with allegations under the PNDT Act, later expanded to include charges under the NDPS Act and IPC.

This judgment brings into focus the crucial aspect of judicial scrutiny at the pre-charge stage in criminal proceedings. The High Court’s decision to remand the matter for fresh adjudication reflects a progressive approach towards ensuring that justice is served by considering all pertinent materials and not just those initially presented.

Date of Decision: 24.11.2023

ASHOK KUMAR VS STATE OF PUNJAB

Latest Legal News