Second 482 Petition Maintainable On Changed Circumstances: Allahabad HC Quashes Proceedings Against Aptech VP In Jal Nigam Recruitment Case Police Have No Jurisdiction To Adjudicate Civil Disputes Between Parties, Must Adhere To Statutory Limits: Andhra Pradesh High Court Consent Decree Based On Compromise Signed By Constituted Attorney And Counsel Is Binding Even After 30 Years: Bombay High Court Changing Service Conditions Mid-Bond For Senior Residents Doctors Is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Quashes Retroactive Application Of New SOP Succession Certificate Under Indian Succession Act Cannot Determine Entitlement To Family Pension And Retiral Benefits: Allahabad High Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected For Failure To Value Reliefs Separately And Pay Ad-Valorem Court Fees: Delhi High Court NDPS Act | Non-Compliance With Mandatory Provisions Of Sections 42, 50 And 57 Vitiates Search And Seizure, Warrants Acquittal: Gujarat High Court FIR Cannot Be Quashed Merely On Complainant’s Consent; Court Must Independently Scrutinize If Ingredients Of Offence Are Made Out: Calcutta High Court Section 25 Hindu Marriage Act | Permanent Alimony Must Be Based On Husband’s Financial Capacity And Wife’s Reasonable Comfort: Jharkhand High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Direct Registration Of FIR Or Constitute SIT When Statutory Remedies Under CrPC Are Available: Delhi High Court Child Cannot Be Used As A Pawn To Prove Adultery Between Parents: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Plea To Examine Minor As Witness Section 156(3) CrPC | Magistrate Cannot Give Criminal Colour To Administrative Disputes By Directing FIR Registration Without Compliance With Priyanka Srivastava: High Court Contempt Of Court Act | Burden To Prove 'Willful Disobedience' Lies Upon Complainant; Merely Alleging Non-Compliance Is Insufficient: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Dismiss Matrimonial Petition Merely For Lack Of 'Elaborate' Evidence In Ex-Parte Proceedings: Kerala High Court Election Petition Under Section 100 RP Act Must Be Supported By Mandatory Affidavit In Form 94A For Corrupt Practice Allegations: Madras High Court Water Act | Supreme Court Directive Overrides Previous Quashing Orders; Magistrate Can Proceed Against Municipal Officials For Unchecked Sewage Discharge: Karnataka High Court A&C Act | Arbitrator’s Decision On Jurisdiction Treated As A Preliminary Issue Amounts To An 'Interim Award' Amenable To Challenge Under Section 34: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 138 NI Act | No Requirement To Hear Accused At Pre-Cognizance Stage Under Section 223 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 94 BNSS | Financial Institutions Entitled To Retain Custody Of Pledged Gold Provided Undertaking Is Filed Before Trial Court: Telangana High Court Family Courts Act | Section 14 Overrides Section 92 Indian Evidence Act To Admit Oral Evidence For Proving Real Source Of Funds: Kerala High Court

Defense Rights Extend to Pre-Charge Stage – Summon Record Can be Summoned: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana delivered a landmark judgment, emphasizing the rights of the defense in the pre-charge stage of criminal cases. The court quashed an earlier decision of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, in the case involving Ashok Kumar and the State of Punjab.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the matter, made a pivotal observation, stating, “The court is not debarred from summoning or relying upon material of sterling quality even if such document is not a part of the charge sheet.” This remark underscores the court’s acknowledgment of the defense’s rights to invoke Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. at the initial stage of framing charges, provided there is compelling material that could influence the case’s direction.

The revision petition filed by Ashok Kumar contested the dismissal of his application, which sought to summon records pertaining to the alleged recovery of 1170 tablets under Batch No.CLE 2001. The case, which began with allegations under the PNDT Act, later expanded to include charges under the NDPS Act and IPC.

This judgment brings into focus the crucial aspect of judicial scrutiny at the pre-charge stage in criminal proceedings. The High Court’s decision to remand the matter for fresh adjudication reflects a progressive approach towards ensuring that justice is served by considering all pertinent materials and not just those initially presented.

Date of Decision: 24.11.2023

ASHOK KUMAR VS STATE OF PUNJAB

Latest Legal News