Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Default Bail U/S 167(2) Cr.P.C. Conditions Must Be Reasonable: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgement delivered by the bench of Hon'ble Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri on October 11, 2023, the court has reaffirmed the paramount importance of personal liberty while addressing the imposition of conditions on the grant of default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C). The verdict resonates with the principles of justice, emphasizing that default bail conditions must be reasonable and just, respecting the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India.

The court's observations highlight the core issue at hand: whether conditions attached to default bail can be deemed impractical, unreasonable, and onerous. In its profound wisdom, the court declared, "Conditions imposed on default bail cannot be punitive in nature but should facilitate an accused's right to liberty."

Furthermore, the judgement underscores the fundamental right to personal liberty, enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, as the bedrock of the justice system. The court stated, "Personal liberty is not a mere formality but a constitutional guarantee that should not be eroded by unjustifiable bail conditions."

The ruling firmly establishes the principle that judicial discretion exercised in imposing conditions on default bail must be guided by reason, justice, and fairness. It prohibits the imposition of conditions that hinder an accused person's release, ensuring that the scales of justice remain balanced.

In response to concerns raised during the proceedings, the court has taken a proactive step to enhance the knowledge of judicial officers. It has called for an orientation course on Fundamental Rights, with a focus on the Constitution of India, to be conducted for all judicial officers in the States of Punjab, Haryana, and UT, Chandigarh. This initiative aims to equip judicial officers with the necessary expertise to uphold personal liberty while administering justice.

This judgement is poised to have far-reaching implications on the criminal justice system, heralding a new era where personal liberty is paramount, and unreasonable bail conditions are consigned to the past. As the court aptly stated, "Justice is best served when personal liberty is upheld, and the Constitution is respected."

Date of Decision: 11 October 2023                                                                                      

Mohammad Javed Ali  vs State of U.T. Chandigarh     

Similar News