Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Default Bail U/S 167(2) Cr.P.C. Conditions Must Be Reasonable: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgement delivered by the bench of Hon'ble Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri on October 11, 2023, the court has reaffirmed the paramount importance of personal liberty while addressing the imposition of conditions on the grant of default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C). The verdict resonates with the principles of justice, emphasizing that default bail conditions must be reasonable and just, respecting the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India.

The court's observations highlight the core issue at hand: whether conditions attached to default bail can be deemed impractical, unreasonable, and onerous. In its profound wisdom, the court declared, "Conditions imposed on default bail cannot be punitive in nature but should facilitate an accused's right to liberty."

Furthermore, the judgement underscores the fundamental right to personal liberty, enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, as the bedrock of the justice system. The court stated, "Personal liberty is not a mere formality but a constitutional guarantee that should not be eroded by unjustifiable bail conditions."

The ruling firmly establishes the principle that judicial discretion exercised in imposing conditions on default bail must be guided by reason, justice, and fairness. It prohibits the imposition of conditions that hinder an accused person's release, ensuring that the scales of justice remain balanced.

In response to concerns raised during the proceedings, the court has taken a proactive step to enhance the knowledge of judicial officers. It has called for an orientation course on Fundamental Rights, with a focus on the Constitution of India, to be conducted for all judicial officers in the States of Punjab, Haryana, and UT, Chandigarh. This initiative aims to equip judicial officers with the necessary expertise to uphold personal liberty while administering justice.

This judgement is poised to have far-reaching implications on the criminal justice system, heralding a new era where personal liberty is paramount, and unreasonable bail conditions are consigned to the past. As the court aptly stated, "Justice is best served when personal liberty is upheld, and the Constitution is respected."

Date of Decision: 11 October 2023                                                                                      

Mohammad Javed Ali  vs State of U.T. Chandigarh     

Similar News