Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Default Bail U/S 167(2) Cr.P.C. Conditions Must Be Reasonable: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgement delivered by the bench of Hon'ble Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri on October 11, 2023, the court has reaffirmed the paramount importance of personal liberty while addressing the imposition of conditions on the grant of default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C). The verdict resonates with the principles of justice, emphasizing that default bail conditions must be reasonable and just, respecting the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India.

The court's observations highlight the core issue at hand: whether conditions attached to default bail can be deemed impractical, unreasonable, and onerous. In its profound wisdom, the court declared, "Conditions imposed on default bail cannot be punitive in nature but should facilitate an accused's right to liberty."

Furthermore, the judgement underscores the fundamental right to personal liberty, enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, as the bedrock of the justice system. The court stated, "Personal liberty is not a mere formality but a constitutional guarantee that should not be eroded by unjustifiable bail conditions."

The ruling firmly establishes the principle that judicial discretion exercised in imposing conditions on default bail must be guided by reason, justice, and fairness. It prohibits the imposition of conditions that hinder an accused person's release, ensuring that the scales of justice remain balanced.

In response to concerns raised during the proceedings, the court has taken a proactive step to enhance the knowledge of judicial officers. It has called for an orientation course on Fundamental Rights, with a focus on the Constitution of India, to be conducted for all judicial officers in the States of Punjab, Haryana, and UT, Chandigarh. This initiative aims to equip judicial officers with the necessary expertise to uphold personal liberty while administering justice.

This judgement is poised to have far-reaching implications on the criminal justice system, heralding a new era where personal liberty is paramount, and unreasonable bail conditions are consigned to the past. As the court aptly stated, "Justice is best served when personal liberty is upheld, and the Constitution is respected."

Date of Decision: 11 October 2023                                                                                      

Mohammad Javed Ali  vs State of U.T. Chandigarh     

Latest Legal News