Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Default Bail U/S 167(2) Cr.P.C. Conditions Must Be Reasonable: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgement delivered by the bench of Hon'ble Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri on October 11, 2023, the court has reaffirmed the paramount importance of personal liberty while addressing the imposition of conditions on the grant of default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C). The verdict resonates with the principles of justice, emphasizing that default bail conditions must be reasonable and just, respecting the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India.

The court's observations highlight the core issue at hand: whether conditions attached to default bail can be deemed impractical, unreasonable, and onerous. In its profound wisdom, the court declared, "Conditions imposed on default bail cannot be punitive in nature but should facilitate an accused's right to liberty."

Furthermore, the judgement underscores the fundamental right to personal liberty, enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, as the bedrock of the justice system. The court stated, "Personal liberty is not a mere formality but a constitutional guarantee that should not be eroded by unjustifiable bail conditions."

The ruling firmly establishes the principle that judicial discretion exercised in imposing conditions on default bail must be guided by reason, justice, and fairness. It prohibits the imposition of conditions that hinder an accused person's release, ensuring that the scales of justice remain balanced.

In response to concerns raised during the proceedings, the court has taken a proactive step to enhance the knowledge of judicial officers. It has called for an orientation course on Fundamental Rights, with a focus on the Constitution of India, to be conducted for all judicial officers in the States of Punjab, Haryana, and UT, Chandigarh. This initiative aims to equip judicial officers with the necessary expertise to uphold personal liberty while administering justice.

This judgement is poised to have far-reaching implications on the criminal justice system, heralding a new era where personal liberty is paramount, and unreasonable bail conditions are consigned to the past. As the court aptly stated, "Justice is best served when personal liberty is upheld, and the Constitution is respected."

Date of Decision: 11 October 2023                                                                                      

Mohammad Javed Ali  vs State of U.T. Chandigarh     

Similar News