Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Default Bail U/S 167(2) Cr.P.C. Conditions Must Be Reasonable: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgement delivered by the bench of Hon'ble Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri on October 11, 2023, the court has reaffirmed the paramount importance of personal liberty while addressing the imposition of conditions on the grant of default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C). The verdict resonates with the principles of justice, emphasizing that default bail conditions must be reasonable and just, respecting the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India.

The court's observations highlight the core issue at hand: whether conditions attached to default bail can be deemed impractical, unreasonable, and onerous. In its profound wisdom, the court declared, "Conditions imposed on default bail cannot be punitive in nature but should facilitate an accused's right to liberty."

Furthermore, the judgement underscores the fundamental right to personal liberty, enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, as the bedrock of the justice system. The court stated, "Personal liberty is not a mere formality but a constitutional guarantee that should not be eroded by unjustifiable bail conditions."

The ruling firmly establishes the principle that judicial discretion exercised in imposing conditions on default bail must be guided by reason, justice, and fairness. It prohibits the imposition of conditions that hinder an accused person's release, ensuring that the scales of justice remain balanced.

In response to concerns raised during the proceedings, the court has taken a proactive step to enhance the knowledge of judicial officers. It has called for an orientation course on Fundamental Rights, with a focus on the Constitution of India, to be conducted for all judicial officers in the States of Punjab, Haryana, and UT, Chandigarh. This initiative aims to equip judicial officers with the necessary expertise to uphold personal liberty while administering justice.

This judgement is poised to have far-reaching implications on the criminal justice system, heralding a new era where personal liberty is paramount, and unreasonable bail conditions are consigned to the past. As the court aptly stated, "Justice is best served when personal liberty is upheld, and the Constitution is respected."

Date of Decision: 11 October 2023                                                                                      

Mohammad Javed Ali  vs State of U.T. Chandigarh     

Latest Legal News