Auction Purchaser Has No Vested Right Without Sale Confirmation: Calcutta HC Upholds Borrower’s Redemption Right Under Pre-Amendment SARFAESI Law Identification Without TIP, Electronic Records Without 65B Certificate – Conviction Set Aside: Patna High Court Nothing Inflicts A Deeper Wound On Our Constitutional Culture Than A State Official Running Berserk Regardless Of Human Rights: Jharkhand High Court Orders ₹1.5 Lakh Interim Compensation Dishonour Due to ‘Account Blocked’ Not Attributable to Drawer—No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Cannot Be Rebutted By Mere Assertions: Delhi High Court Affirms Conviction In 32-Year-Old Cheque Bounce Case Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Debt: Kerala High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case, Rejects Blanket Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Justice Cannot Be Left to Guesswork: Supreme Court Mandates Structured Judgments in Criminal Trials Across India Truth Must Be Proven Beyond Doubt—Not Built On Flawed FIRs, Tainted Witnesses And Investigative Gaps: Supreme Court Acquits Man in POCSO Rape-Murder Case Once parties agree and reconciliation is impossible, a fault-based decree is unnecessary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Divorce on Desertion No Escape from Statutory Ceiling: Exclusive Expenditure by Foreign Head Offices Also Attracts Section 44C Income Tax: Supreme Court Loss Of A Child Cannot Be Calculated In Rupees, But Law Must At Least Offer Dignity In Compensation: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation Sessions Court Cannot Direct Life Imprisonment Till Natural Life Without Remission: Supreme Court Reasserts Limits on Sentencing Powers of Subordinate Courts ‘Continuously Means Without a Single Break’: Supreme Court Bars Expired-and-Renewed Licences From Police Driver Recruitment Chief Justice’s Power Under Section 51(3) Is Independent and Continuing: Supreme Court Upholds Kolhapur Bench Notification Last Seen Evidence Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case No Cultivation on Forest Land Without Central Clearance: Supreme Court Cancels Lease Over 134 Acres, Orders Reforestation Appointment from Rank List Must Respect Communal Rotation: SC Declines Claim of SC Waitlisted Candidate After Resignation of Appointee Supreme Court Dissolves 20-Year Estranged Marriage Under Article 142 Despite Wife’s Objection Murder Inside Temple Cannot Be Treated Lightly: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Father-Son Convicts in Group Killing Case

Cyber Crimes Are Not Faceless Fantasies—Investigations Cannot Be Baseless: Karnataka High Court Declares Cyber Command Centre as a Necessity, Not Option

16 September 2025 2:15 PM

By: sayum


“In a faceless regime of criminals operating from anywhere at the click of the mouse... investigations would become baseless if not tackled with a new-age antidote” in a landmark proceeding filed by Newspace Research and Technologies Pvt. Ltd., the Karnataka High Court issued a transformative directive, mandating the creation and operationalization of a robust Cyber Command Centre (CCC) as a specialized infrastructure to combat the exponential rise in cyber crimes.

Delivering a sharply worded judgment, Justice M. Nagaprasanna emphasized that the CCC must not remain a "mere edifice of bureaucracy," but a "beacon heralding a new dawn in the fight against cyber crime." He stressed that Karnataka must lead the way in “ushering a new beginning of tackling the new age crime with new age investigating centres.”

“If CCC Becomes a Paper Implementation, Justice Will Become a Mirage”: Court Warns Against Bureaucratic Delay

The Court had earlier, on 25th April 2025, directed the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe Crime No. 1025 of 2024 and passed orders that led to the broader question of cyber crime governance. In a path-breaking observation in Paragraph 13 of that order, the Court stated:

“The State thus must recognize the existential threat and evolve, failing which, justice to those victims will become a mirage.”

It further noted that although the Government had envisioned the establishment of a CCC headed by a Director General of Police, the concept had remained inert. The Court warned:

“This CCC should not be a mere edifice of bureaucracy, but a paradigm shift… Such a Command Centre must be insulated from external intrusion and administrative meddling.”

“Do Not Shift the Cyber Cops Like Chairs in a Bureaucratic Musical Game”: High Court Bars Frequent Transfers of CCC Officers

Recognizing that continuity and insulation from political or administrative interference is critical to institutional strength, the Court made a powerful declaration:

“Officers that are brought under the umbrella of the CCC must serve with continuity and without disruptions of frequent transfers... The head of the CCC and his team must not be overnight de-positioned without consultation of the head.”

This judicial pronouncement elevates the principle of operational independence into the heart of cyber governance.

“CCC Must Integrate Helpline 1930, Register Zero FIRs, and Create a Unified Cyber Crime Architecture”: Court Orders Institutional Synergy

A particularly groundbreaking direction came in relation to helpline 1930, a public reporting mechanism for cyber fraud:

“All of this happens without a document, as no crime is registered... it is necessary that 1930 helpline and the conversation therein be recorded as part of police/information technology system... and if necessary, draw up a Zero FIR against each of them.”

The Court directed that helpline 1930 be fully integrated with the Police IT Application and the CCC, ensuring no complaints vanish into procedural limbo.

“When Crime Is at the Click of a Mouse, Investigation Must Be at the Edge of the Algorithm”: Data Shows Cybercrime Explosion

Citing alarming statistics, the Court noted: “The cases reported under the IT Act were only 8396 in 2021. In 2025, it has grown to 30,000. The graph has climbed steeply—a chilling reminder of the exponential growth of cyber crime.”

It further warned: “The CCC is not an option, but an imperative born of necessity.”

The Court's scrutiny of statistics revealed that jurisdictional police stations are often ill-equipped, while CEN police stations alone cannot handle the volume and technicality. A unified umbrella architecture, the Court emphasized, is the only sustainable solution.

“The Court Will Monitor Implementation—CCC Must Submit Periodic Reports”: Judiciary Steps into Oversight Mode

To ensure compliance, the High Court has retained continuing mandamus jurisdiction over the matter. The Director General of Police heading the CCC is now obligated to submit periodic reports detailing:

  • Progress of investigations handled by CCC

  • Integration of information across police and IT platforms

  • Internal transparency mechanisms within CCC

  • Steps taken towards integration of helpline 1930

 “Faceless Crime Demands Fearless Governance” — Karnataka Sets a National Benchmark in Cyber Policing

In a rare judicial blueprint for systemic reform, the Karnataka High Court’s judgment reflects visionary jurisprudence, compelling the executive to recognize cybercrime not just as a criminal problem but as a national security concern.

By holding that “frequent transfers of cyber investigators must be prevented”, and mandating the recording of helpline complaints as Zero FIRs, the Court has reimagined the institutional framework required to face 21st-century crimes.

This decision not only charts the future of cyber policing in Karnataka but offers a national template for building cyber-resilient investigative frameworks that are people-friendly, transparent, and technologically equipped.

Date of Decision: 10.09.2025

 

Latest Legal News