Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court

Credibility of Dying Declaration Crucial: Gujarat High Court in Upholding Acquittal in Dowry Harassment Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court confirms trial court's acquittal of accused under Sections 498(A), 306, and 114 of IPC, emphasizing the significance of consistent and credible evidence.

In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court has upheld the acquittal of Rameshbhai Karshanbhai Gohil and others accused of dowry harassment and abetment to suicide. The judgment, delivered by Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, reaffirms the decision of the trial court, citing the lack of substantial evidence to overturn the acquittal. The court emphasized the importance of consistent and credible evidence in such serious allegations.

The case originates from a complaint filed by Nanjibhai Arjanbhai Dhokia, whose daughter, after enduring two years of alleged mental and physical torture from her husband Rameshbhai Karshanbhai Gohil and in-laws, committed suicide by self-immolation. The prosecution charged the accused under Sections 498(A) (cruelty by husband or relatives), 306 (abetment to suicide), and 114 (abettor present when the offence is committed) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The High Court noted that the evidence presented by the prosecution, including the testimonies of the deceased's parents and the medical reports, did not conclusively prove the charges against the respondents. Justice Nanavati pointed out that the discrepancies in the prosecution's case created reasonable doubt about the guilt of the accused. "The trial court's decision is a plausible view and does not suffer from perversity," the judgment stated.

One of the pivotal aspects of the case was the dying declaration of the deceased, recorded by the Executive Magistrate and certified by a doctor, in which she stated that the injuries were accidental, occurring while she was trying to light a stove. The High Court gave significant weight to this declaration, considering it credible and made in a sound state of mind.

Justice Nanavati extensively discussed the principles governing appeals against acquittals, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence in favor of the accused. The judgment referenced several Supreme Court rulings that outline the stringent standards for overturning acquittals, highlighting the necessity for the appellate court to find "absolute assurance of the guilt" based on the evidence on record.

"The appreciation of evidence is the core element of a criminal trial, and such appreciation must be comprehensive, inclusive of all evidence, oral or documentary," Justice Nanavati observed. "The dying declaration recorded by the Executive Magistrate, certified by the doctor, and the absence of conclusive evidence supporting the prosecution's case, justify the trial court's decision."

The Gujarat High Court's decision to uphold the acquittal underscores the judiciary's commitment to a thorough and fair evaluation of evidence in criminal cases. By reaffirming the trial court's findings, the judgment highlights the critical importance of credible evidence and the high threshold for overturning acquittals. This ruling is expected to influence future cases, particularly those involving serious charges like dowry harassment and abetment to suicide, reinforcing the legal standards for evidence and judicial review.

 

 Date of Decision: May 15, 2024

The State of Gujarat vs. Rameshbhai Karshanbhai Gohil & Ors.

Similar News