Summary Security Force Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Civil Offences Beyond Simple Hurt And Theft: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Vague Allegations Cannot Dissolve a Sacred Marital Relationship: Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Divorce Petition Daughters Entitled to Coparcenary Rights in Ancestral Property under Hindu Succession Act, 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Divorce | False Allegations of Domestic Violence and Paternity Questions Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Hostile Witness Testimony Admissible if Corroborated by Independent Evidence: Punjab and Haryana High Court Fraud Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt to Invalidate Registered Documents: Andhra Pradesh High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Rash Driving Conviction But Grants Probation to First-Time Offender Bus Driver Orissa High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband Convicted of Wife's Murder Merit Cannot Be Sacrificed for Procedural Technicalities in NEET UG Admissions: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Upholds Partition Decrees: Unregistered Partition Deed Inadmissible, Fails to Prove Prior Partition - Joint Hindu Family Property Presumed Undivided: Patna High Court Section 195(1)(b) CrPC | Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Undermined: Supreme Court Restores Evidence Tampering Case In a NDPS Case Readiness and Willingness, Not Time, Decide Equity in Sale Agreements: Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance Prolonged Detention Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case DV ACT | Economic Abuse Includes Alienation of Assets, Necessitating Protection Orders: Allahabad High Court Illegal Structures to Face Demolition: Bombay HC Directs Strict Action Against Unauthorized Constructions Justice Must Extend to the Last Person Behind Bars: Supreme Court Pushes for Full Implementation of BNSS Section 479 to Relieve Undertrial Prisoners Efficiency Over Central Oversight: Supreme Court Asserts Need for Localized SIT in Chennai Case Partition, Not Injunction, Is Remedy for Joint Property Disputes: P&H High Court Dismisses Plea Subsequent Purchaser Can Question Plaintiff’s Intent: MP High Court Clarifies Specific Relief Act Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act

Credibility of Dying Declaration Crucial: Gujarat High Court in Upholding Acquittal in Dowry Harassment Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court confirms trial court's acquittal of accused under Sections 498(A), 306, and 114 of IPC, emphasizing the significance of consistent and credible evidence.

In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court has upheld the acquittal of Rameshbhai Karshanbhai Gohil and others accused of dowry harassment and abetment to suicide. The judgment, delivered by Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, reaffirms the decision of the trial court, citing the lack of substantial evidence to overturn the acquittal. The court emphasized the importance of consistent and credible evidence in such serious allegations.

The case originates from a complaint filed by Nanjibhai Arjanbhai Dhokia, whose daughter, after enduring two years of alleged mental and physical torture from her husband Rameshbhai Karshanbhai Gohil and in-laws, committed suicide by self-immolation. The prosecution charged the accused under Sections 498(A) (cruelty by husband or relatives), 306 (abetment to suicide), and 114 (abettor present when the offence is committed) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The High Court noted that the evidence presented by the prosecution, including the testimonies of the deceased's parents and the medical reports, did not conclusively prove the charges against the respondents. Justice Nanavati pointed out that the discrepancies in the prosecution's case created reasonable doubt about the guilt of the accused. "The trial court's decision is a plausible view and does not suffer from perversity," the judgment stated.

One of the pivotal aspects of the case was the dying declaration of the deceased, recorded by the Executive Magistrate and certified by a doctor, in which she stated that the injuries were accidental, occurring while she was trying to light a stove. The High Court gave significant weight to this declaration, considering it credible and made in a sound state of mind.

Justice Nanavati extensively discussed the principles governing appeals against acquittals, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence in favor of the accused. The judgment referenced several Supreme Court rulings that outline the stringent standards for overturning acquittals, highlighting the necessity for the appellate court to find "absolute assurance of the guilt" based on the evidence on record.

"The appreciation of evidence is the core element of a criminal trial, and such appreciation must be comprehensive, inclusive of all evidence, oral or documentary," Justice Nanavati observed. "The dying declaration recorded by the Executive Magistrate, certified by the doctor, and the absence of conclusive evidence supporting the prosecution's case, justify the trial court's decision."

The Gujarat High Court's decision to uphold the acquittal underscores the judiciary's commitment to a thorough and fair evaluation of evidence in criminal cases. By reaffirming the trial court's findings, the judgment highlights the critical importance of credible evidence and the high threshold for overturning acquittals. This ruling is expected to influence future cases, particularly those involving serious charges like dowry harassment and abetment to suicide, reinforcing the legal standards for evidence and judicial review.

 

 Date of Decision: May 15, 2024

The State of Gujarat vs. Rameshbhai Karshanbhai Gohil & Ors.

Similar News