Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Court is Not Bound by Government Guidelines in Assessing Damage and Fixing Compensation: Kerala High Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Devaluation Under High Voltage Lines

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court dismissed the civil revision petitions filed against the enhanced compensation for land devaluation due to the installation of 400 KV electric lines by Power Grid Corporation of India. Justice V.G. Arun, presiding over the case, emphasized that the court is not restricted by government-set guidelines when assessing damages and determining fair compensation.

The case arose from disputes concerning compensation for land value diminution and tree loss due to high voltage electric lines installed by Power Grid Corporation across the property of M.P. Balakrishnan, the revision petitioner. The petitioner challenged the initial compensation awarded, claiming it was insufficient given the significant impact on the land’s utility and value.

Compensation for Trees: The court agreed with the lower court’s decision, rejecting the claim for enhanced compensation for tree loss due to a lack of sufficient evidence to support the claimant’s assertions.

Land Devaluation Compensation: On the more contested issue of land value diminution, the court noted the lower court’s meticulous consideration of various factors such as the property’s location, proximity to infrastructure, and the extent to which the high voltage lines affected the land. The lower court had judiciously assessed the compensation, basing it on a comparative analysis with similar properties impacted by such infrastructure.

Judicial Discretion on Compensation: Justice Arun reiterated that the judiciary has the discretion to adjust compensation based on the actual damage and characteristics of the land. He pointed out that, “while assessing the damage sustained and fixing the compensation, the court is not bound by the guidelines/orders issued by the Government.”

Interest on Compensation: The court upheld the decision to award 9% interest on the compensation, aligning with legal precedents that support such interest provisions as just and equitable in cases of delayed compensation payments.

Decision: The High Court confirmed the lower court’s enhanced compensation figures, dismissing both the petitioner’s and the corporation’s revision petitions. The court ordered the adjusted compensation amount to be paid within three months, reinforcing the right to fair compensation for landowners affected by public utility projects.

Date of Decision: April 25, 2024

M.P. Balakrishnan vs. Power Grid Corporation of India et al.

Similar News