Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

"Court Convicts in Tragic Burn Case: Culpable Homicide, Not Murder"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

In a significant legal verdict, the judiciary has delivered a judgment in a heart-wrenching case of a fatal burn incident. The defendant has been convicted of culpable homicide, with a sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine of Rs.1,000. Furthermore, the defendant has been acquitted of charges under Sections 498A and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.

The verdict was pronounced by Justices Shivkumar Dige and A.S. Gadkari, who examined the case closely. Their observations shed light on the tragic incident and the intent behind it. As the judgment was delivered, Justice Dige remarked, "The act of the defendant falls under Section 304 (Part-II) of the IPC."

The Court considered the circumstances surrounding the incident and found that it had occurred suddenly during a heated moment. Justice Gadkari emphasized, "The incident happened in the spur of the moment, and the defendant had knowledge about the act he was committing. Therefore, the offense is culpable homicide not amounting to murder."

Apart from the legal outcome, the Court addressed the issue of legal fees for the defendant's representation. Mr. Hrishikesh Chavan, the appointed counsel to prosecute the defendant's case by the Legal Aid Committee, has been granted legal fees and expenses quantified at Rs. 20,000. This decision was taken in recognition of the importance of providing effective legal representation.

The Court's decision has set a precedent in understanding cases involving fatal incidents and distinguishing between intentional murder and culpable homicide. The verdict has sent a message about the significance of evaluating the circumstances and intent behind such unfortunate events.

This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in criminal cases and the judiciary's commitment to ensuring justice is served in a fair and comprehensive manner.

D.D-12.Oct.2023

Israr Mukhtar Varsi, vs The State of Maharashtra         

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    11 June 2026 9:19 AM
Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court
  • by sayum
    11 June 2026 9:19 AM
SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court
  • by sayum
    11 June 2026 9:18 AM
Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC
  • by sayum
    11 June 2026 9:18 AM
Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
  • by sayum
    11 June 2026 8:06 AM
Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court
  • by sayum
    11 June 2026 8:05 AM
138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court