Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

"Court Convicts in Tragic Burn Case: Culpable Homicide, Not Murder"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal verdict, the judiciary has delivered a judgment in a heart-wrenching case of a fatal burn incident. The defendant has been convicted of culpable homicide, with a sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine of Rs.1,000. Furthermore, the defendant has been acquitted of charges under Sections 498A and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.

The verdict was pronounced by Justices Shivkumar Dige and A.S. Gadkari, who examined the case closely. Their observations shed light on the tragic incident and the intent behind it. As the judgment was delivered, Justice Dige remarked, "The act of the defendant falls under Section 304 (Part-II) of the IPC."

The Court considered the circumstances surrounding the incident and found that it had occurred suddenly during a heated moment. Justice Gadkari emphasized, "The incident happened in the spur of the moment, and the defendant had knowledge about the act he was committing. Therefore, the offense is culpable homicide not amounting to murder."

Apart from the legal outcome, the Court addressed the issue of legal fees for the defendant's representation. Mr. Hrishikesh Chavan, the appointed counsel to prosecute the defendant's case by the Legal Aid Committee, has been granted legal fees and expenses quantified at Rs. 20,000. This decision was taken in recognition of the importance of providing effective legal representation.

The Court's decision has set a precedent in understanding cases involving fatal incidents and distinguishing between intentional murder and culpable homicide. The verdict has sent a message about the significance of evaluating the circumstances and intent behind such unfortunate events.

This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in criminal cases and the judiciary's commitment to ensuring justice is served in a fair and comprehensive manner.

D.D-12.Oct.2023

Israr Mukhtar Varsi, vs The State of Maharashtra         

Latest Legal News