Contempt Proceedings Initiated Against Naresh Sharma for Derogatory Allegations Against Judiciary: Delhi High Court

In a significant development, the judiciary has initiated contempt proceedings against Naresh Sharma, following his severe allegations against a learned Single Bench and the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The contempt proceedings stem from Naresh Sharma's challenge of a prior judgment, which was laden with serious allegations, including criminal charges and even a death penalty against the Single Bench.

The controversy began when Naresh Sharma filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), seeking criminal prosecution against various respondents, including governmental bodies and Tata entities. However, the Single Bench dismissed these petitions on 20.07.2023, citing a lack of merit, absence of supporting material, and an abuse of law. Notably, the judgment also highlighted the burden that frivolous litigations place on the judiciary and imposed a cost of Rs. 30,000/- in each petition on the petitioner.

In response to this, Naresh Sharma launched scathing allegations against the judiciary, accusing it of stealing his fundamental rights under Article 14 of the Constitution and making seditious statements. He went on to describe the judgment as defamatory, criminal, and seditious, and even sought severe criminal charges against the Single Bench.

The Division Bench-I, taking cognizance of these disparaging allegations, sought an explanation from Naresh Sharma and subsequently initiated contempt proceedings. The Court emphasized the importance of distinguishing between legitimate critique and attempts to scandalize the Court, underlining the necessity of addressing such behavior through contempt proceedings.

The Single Bench's judgment on the earlier writ petitions also initiated a discussion on the implications of frivolous litigations on the judiciary. It called for judicial reforms and financial sanctions to deter frivolous litigants, all while balancing the right to access the courts with the need to curb the abuse of the legal process.

In the latest development, the Contemnor has been held guilty of contempt and sentenced to six months of simple imprisonment, along with a fine of Rs. 2,000. Notably, the Contemnor has refused to tender an unconditional apology for his conduct and allegations, standing by his contentious and disrespectful stance towards the judiciary and government officials.

This case highlights the delicate balance between freedom of expression and respect for the judiciary, reminding us of the importance of upholding the dignity and integrity of our legal system.

Date of Decision: October 31, 2023

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS NARESH SHARMA