CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Consideration for Relinquishment of Trusteeship Not a Capital Receipt; Taxable as Individual Income: Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that consideration received for the relinquishment of trusteeship cannot be considered as a capital receipt for tax purposes. The judgment delivered by a Division Bench consisting of Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Mr. Justice Syam Kumar V.M. on 3rd April 2024, addressed various contentious issues under the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to the trustees of Carmel Educational Trust and St. Thomas Education Trust.

 

The primary legal issue centered around whether the remuneration received for relinquishing trusteeship positions within a trust could be classified as a capital receipt and thus not taxable. The court also deliberated on payments received for construction work and donations to the trust.

 

The case involved the assessment of income and donations received by trustees for AY 2009-10 to 2011-12. The appellants, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kochi, challenged the Tribunal’s decision on remuneration and donations received by trustees. The trusts were engaged in educational activities and underwent changes in trusteeship, including payments for relinquishing trusteeship and construction work.

 

Remuneration for Trusteeship Relinquishment: The court observed that no evidence in the trust deed authorized trustees to relinquish their positions for consideration. It held that such remuneration should be treated as individual income of trustees and assessed under appropriate head. This remuneration cannot be treated as a capital receipt.

 

Construction Work Compensation: The court found no interference necessary in the Tribunal’s reliance on the audited balance sheet and TDS payments regarding amounts received by trustees for construction work.

 

Donations to Trust: It was upheld that donations received by St. Thomas Education Trust were not to be considered as income in the hands of individual trustees.

 

Decision: The appeals (ITA Nos. 54/2020, 55/2020, 56/2020, 68/2020, and 6/2021) concerning construction work compensation and donations were dismissed in favor of the assessee. However, the appeals (ITA Nos. 46/2020, 48/2020, 49/2020, and 51/2020) regarding trusteeship relinquishment remuneration were partly allowed and remanded. ITA No. 47/2020 was allowed by way of remand.

Date of Decision: 3rd April 2024

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), Kochi v. Gracy Babu, Adoor P.O, Pathanamthitta & Others

Latest Legal News