District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

Consideration for Relinquishment of Trusteeship Not a Capital Receipt; Taxable as Individual Income: Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that consideration received for the relinquishment of trusteeship cannot be considered as a capital receipt for tax purposes. The judgment delivered by a Division Bench consisting of Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Mr. Justice Syam Kumar V.M. on 3rd April 2024, addressed various contentious issues under the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to the trustees of Carmel Educational Trust and St. Thomas Education Trust.

 

The primary legal issue centered around whether the remuneration received for relinquishing trusteeship positions within a trust could be classified as a capital receipt and thus not taxable. The court also deliberated on payments received for construction work and donations to the trust.

 

The case involved the assessment of income and donations received by trustees for AY 2009-10 to 2011-12. The appellants, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kochi, challenged the Tribunal’s decision on remuneration and donations received by trustees. The trusts were engaged in educational activities and underwent changes in trusteeship, including payments for relinquishing trusteeship and construction work.

 

Remuneration for Trusteeship Relinquishment: The court observed that no evidence in the trust deed authorized trustees to relinquish their positions for consideration. It held that such remuneration should be treated as individual income of trustees and assessed under appropriate head. This remuneration cannot be treated as a capital receipt.

 

Construction Work Compensation: The court found no interference necessary in the Tribunal’s reliance on the audited balance sheet and TDS payments regarding amounts received by trustees for construction work.

 

Donations to Trust: It was upheld that donations received by St. Thomas Education Trust were not to be considered as income in the hands of individual trustees.

 

Decision: The appeals (ITA Nos. 54/2020, 55/2020, 56/2020, 68/2020, and 6/2021) concerning construction work compensation and donations were dismissed in favor of the assessee. However, the appeals (ITA Nos. 46/2020, 48/2020, 49/2020, and 51/2020) regarding trusteeship relinquishment remuneration were partly allowed and remanded. ITA No. 47/2020 was allowed by way of remand.

Date of Decision: 3rd April 2024

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), Kochi v. Gracy Babu, Adoor P.O, Pathanamthitta & Others

Latest Legal News