Non-Disclosure Of Medical Deformity While Seeking Re-Appointment Amounts To Deliberate Suppression, Termination Restored: Supreme Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Suit Based On Unregistered Gift Deed Not Maintainable; Plaint Liable For Rejection: Andhra Pradesh High Court Accused Has No Blanket Immunity From Re-Arrest If Initial Arrest Was Declared Illegal Only On Technical Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court Father’s Obligation To Maintain Minor Child Under Section 125 CrPC Is Absolute Even If Mother Is Also Earning: Uttarakhand High Court Variation In Physical Signature No Ground To Reject Bid If Submitted Via Secure Digital Signature Certificate: Orissa High Court Management Cannot Re-Examine Selection After Candidate Alters Position By Leaving Previous Job: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Production Of E-Way Bills Not Proof Of Physical Movement Of Goods; GST Registration Can Be Cancelled For Fake ITC Claims: Madras High Court Employer Cannot Abuse Unequal Bargaining Power To Deny Back Wages For Period Of Eligibility: Supreme Court Restores Dues Of MSRTC Employee Entire Bank Account Of Educational Institution Cannot Be Frozen Merely Because It Received Fees From Accused Parent: Karnataka High Court CARA Must Facilitate Relocation Of Children Adopted Under HAMA; Cannot Abdicate Responsibility By Issuing Mere 'Support Letters': Delhi High Court Valid Caste Certificate Issued By Competent Authority Is Sine Qua Non To Establish Offence Under SC/ST Act: Chhattisgarh High Court Shifting Defense From 'No Transaction' To 'Transaction Not Proved' Prima Facie Shows Dishonest Intent Since Inception: Calcutta High Court Sugar Exports Under Specific Permission Cannot Be Treated As 'Restricted' To Deny RoDTEP Benefits: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Rejects Bail Of Man Who Killed Bystander While Aiming At Another; Invokes 'Doctrine Of Transfer Of Malice' SDO Cannot Reclassify Public Utility Land To Grant Private Leases; Such Pattas Are Void Ab Initio: Supreme Court DNA Test Report Prevails Over Presumption Of Legitimacy Under Section 112 Evidence Act If Report Is Undisputed: Supreme Court Foreign Summary Judgment Passed After Refusing Leave To Defend Is Not 'On Merits' Under Section 13 CPC: Supreme Court Constitutional Safeguards Don’t End At Prison Gates: Supreme Court Extends Mandatory Disability Rights Directions To All States & UTs Courts Not Bound By Low Govt Rates For Prosthetic Limbs; Claimants Entitled To Choose Private Centres For 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Reject Plaint Over Insufficient Court Fee Without Giving Mandatory Opportunity To Correct Valuation: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Illegal Encroachments On National Highways; Bans New Dhabas Within Right Of Way

Consideration for Relinquishment of Trusteeship Not a Capital Receipt; Taxable as Individual Income: Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that consideration received for the relinquishment of trusteeship cannot be considered as a capital receipt for tax purposes. The judgment delivered by a Division Bench consisting of Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Mr. Justice Syam Kumar V.M. on 3rd April 2024, addressed various contentious issues under the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to the trustees of Carmel Educational Trust and St. Thomas Education Trust.

 

The primary legal issue centered around whether the remuneration received for relinquishing trusteeship positions within a trust could be classified as a capital receipt and thus not taxable. The court also deliberated on payments received for construction work and donations to the trust.

 

The case involved the assessment of income and donations received by trustees for AY 2009-10 to 2011-12. The appellants, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kochi, challenged the Tribunal’s decision on remuneration and donations received by trustees. The trusts were engaged in educational activities and underwent changes in trusteeship, including payments for relinquishing trusteeship and construction work.

 

Remuneration for Trusteeship Relinquishment: The court observed that no evidence in the trust deed authorized trustees to relinquish their positions for consideration. It held that such remuneration should be treated as individual income of trustees and assessed under appropriate head. This remuneration cannot be treated as a capital receipt.

 

Construction Work Compensation: The court found no interference necessary in the Tribunal’s reliance on the audited balance sheet and TDS payments regarding amounts received by trustees for construction work.

 

Donations to Trust: It was upheld that donations received by St. Thomas Education Trust were not to be considered as income in the hands of individual trustees.

 

Decision: The appeals (ITA Nos. 54/2020, 55/2020, 56/2020, 68/2020, and 6/2021) concerning construction work compensation and donations were dismissed in favor of the assessee. However, the appeals (ITA Nos. 46/2020, 48/2020, 49/2020, and 51/2020) regarding trusteeship relinquishment remuneration were partly allowed and remanded. ITA No. 47/2020 was allowed by way of remand.

Date of Decision: 3rd April 2024

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), Kochi v. Gracy Babu, Adoor P.O, Pathanamthitta & Others

Latest Legal News