Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Consideration for Relinquishment of Trusteeship Not a Capital Receipt; Taxable as Individual Income: Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that consideration received for the relinquishment of trusteeship cannot be considered as a capital receipt for tax purposes. The judgment delivered by a Division Bench consisting of Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Mr. Justice Syam Kumar V.M. on 3rd April 2024, addressed various contentious issues under the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to the trustees of Carmel Educational Trust and St. Thomas Education Trust.

 

The primary legal issue centered around whether the remuneration received for relinquishing trusteeship positions within a trust could be classified as a capital receipt and thus not taxable. The court also deliberated on payments received for construction work and donations to the trust.

 

The case involved the assessment of income and donations received by trustees for AY 2009-10 to 2011-12. The appellants, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kochi, challenged the Tribunal’s decision on remuneration and donations received by trustees. The trusts were engaged in educational activities and underwent changes in trusteeship, including payments for relinquishing trusteeship and construction work.

 

Remuneration for Trusteeship Relinquishment: The court observed that no evidence in the trust deed authorized trustees to relinquish their positions for consideration. It held that such remuneration should be treated as individual income of trustees and assessed under appropriate head. This remuneration cannot be treated as a capital receipt.

 

Construction Work Compensation: The court found no interference necessary in the Tribunal’s reliance on the audited balance sheet and TDS payments regarding amounts received by trustees for construction work.

 

Donations to Trust: It was upheld that donations received by St. Thomas Education Trust were not to be considered as income in the hands of individual trustees.

 

Decision: The appeals (ITA Nos. 54/2020, 55/2020, 56/2020, 68/2020, and 6/2021) concerning construction work compensation and donations were dismissed in favor of the assessee. However, the appeals (ITA Nos. 46/2020, 48/2020, 49/2020, and 51/2020) regarding trusteeship relinquishment remuneration were partly allowed and remanded. ITA No. 47/2020 was allowed by way of remand.

Date of Decision: 3rd April 2024

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), Kochi v. Gracy Babu, Adoor P.O, Pathanamthitta & Others

Latest Legal News