TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Consideration for Relinquishment of Trusteeship Not a Capital Receipt; Taxable as Individual Income: Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that consideration received for the relinquishment of trusteeship cannot be considered as a capital receipt for tax purposes. The judgment delivered by a Division Bench consisting of Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Mr. Justice Syam Kumar V.M. on 3rd April 2024, addressed various contentious issues under the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to the trustees of Carmel Educational Trust and St. Thomas Education Trust.

 

The primary legal issue centered around whether the remuneration received for relinquishing trusteeship positions within a trust could be classified as a capital receipt and thus not taxable. The court also deliberated on payments received for construction work and donations to the trust.

 

The case involved the assessment of income and donations received by trustees for AY 2009-10 to 2011-12. The appellants, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kochi, challenged the Tribunal’s decision on remuneration and donations received by trustees. The trusts were engaged in educational activities and underwent changes in trusteeship, including payments for relinquishing trusteeship and construction work.

 

Remuneration for Trusteeship Relinquishment: The court observed that no evidence in the trust deed authorized trustees to relinquish their positions for consideration. It held that such remuneration should be treated as individual income of trustees and assessed under appropriate head. This remuneration cannot be treated as a capital receipt.

 

Construction Work Compensation: The court found no interference necessary in the Tribunal’s reliance on the audited balance sheet and TDS payments regarding amounts received by trustees for construction work.

 

Donations to Trust: It was upheld that donations received by St. Thomas Education Trust were not to be considered as income in the hands of individual trustees.

 

Decision: The appeals (ITA Nos. 54/2020, 55/2020, 56/2020, 68/2020, and 6/2021) concerning construction work compensation and donations were dismissed in favor of the assessee. However, the appeals (ITA Nos. 46/2020, 48/2020, 49/2020, and 51/2020) regarding trusteeship relinquishment remuneration were partly allowed and remanded. ITA No. 47/2020 was allowed by way of remand.

Date of Decision: 3rd April 2024

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), Kochi v. Gracy Babu, Adoor P.O, Pathanamthitta & Others

Latest Legal News