Gratuity Is a Property Right, Not a Charity: MP High Court Upholds Gratuity Claims of Long-Term Contract Workers Seized Vehicles Must Not Be Left to Rot in Open Yards: Madras High Court Invokes Article 21, Orders Release of Vehicle Seized in Illegal Quarrying Case Even After Talaq And A Settlement, A Divorced Muslim Woman Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CRPC: Kerala High Court Bail Cannot Be Withheld as Punishment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Govt Official in ₹200 Cr. Scholarship Scam Citing Delay and Article 21 Violation Custodial Interrogation Necessary in Serious Economic Offences: Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹1.91 Cr Housing Scam Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable Sanction to Prosecute Under UAPA Cannot Be a Mechanical Act: Supreme Court Quashes Jharkhand Government’s Third-Time Sanction Without New Evidence FIRs in Corruption Cases Cannot Be Quashed on Hyper-Technical Grounds of Police Station Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ACB Investigations Quashed by Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Completion of Ayurvedic Nursing Training Does Not Confer Right to Appointment: Supreme Court Rejects Legitimate Expectation Claim by Trainees University’s Error Can’t Cost a Student Her Future: Supreme Court Directs Manav Bharti University to Issue Withheld Degree and Marksheets Due to Clerical Mistake Disciplinary Exoneration Cannot Shield Public Servant from Criminal Trial in Corruption Cases: Supreme Court Customs Tariff Act | ‘End Use’ and ‘Common Parlance’ Tests Cannot Override Statutory Context: Supreme Court Classifies Mushroom Shelves as ‘Aluminium Structures’ Supreme Court Allows PIL Against Limited Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers to Continue Under New Social Security Code Liberty Cannot Wait for Endless Trials: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Wadhawan Brothers in ₹57,000 Crore DHFL Scam Co-Sharer Has Superior Right of Pre-emption Even If Land Is Gair Mumkin Bara: Punjab & Haryana High Court Neighbours Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC Merely For Alleged Instigation: Karnataka High Court No Party Has a Right to Demand a Local Commissioner — It's Purely the Court’s Discretion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Civil Revision

Co-Operative Societies Eligible For Tax Deductions U/S 80P Of The Income Tax Act - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, in a bench comprising Hon'ble Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, has provided crucial clarity on tax deductions for co-operative societies under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The judgment, delivered on September 14, 2023, delves into the interpretation of the term "co-operative bank" and its eligibility for deductions under the Income Tax Act. Supreme Court's , "Section 80P of the Act is a beneficial provision... has to be read liberally in favor of the assessee."

The Supreme Court observed, "Section 80P of the Act is a beneficial provision which was enacted in order to encourage and promote the growth of the co-operative sector generally in the economic life of the country and therefore, has to be read liberally in favor of the assessee."

The case revolved around the Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Limited, an apex co-operative society. The central issue was whether this entity qualified as a "co-operative bank" under the relevant provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (BR Act) and the NABARD Act, 1981, and hence, whether it was entitled to the deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.

  1. Definition of Banking Business: The Court emphasized that a co-operative society must be engaged in banking business as defined in Section 5(b) of the BR Act, 1949. Additionally, a co-operative society must obtain a license under Section 22 of the BR Act, 1949, only if it functions as a co-operative bank and not otherwise.
  2. State Co-operative Bank: The Court noted the significance of being declared a state co-operative bank under the NABARD Act, 1981. It pointed out that the Kerala State Co-operative Bank had been declared as a state co-operative bank by the Kerala State Government, whereas the appellant society had not received such a declaration. This implied that the appellant society was not a state co-operative bank.
  3. Conclusion and Decision: The Supreme Court concluded that although the appellant society was an apex co-operative society, it did not qualify as a "co-operative bank" under the BR Act, 1949, and, therefore, was entitled to the benefit of deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.

This landmark judgment provides much-needed clarity on the eligibility of co-operative societies for tax deductions, ensuring that the provisions of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act are applied judiciously. It highlights the importance of fulfilling specific criteria, including engaging in banking business as defined by law and obtaining the necessary licenses.

The decision of the Supreme Court, which comes after a detailed analysis of the relevant provisions, will have far-reaching implications for co-operative societies across the country.

Date of Decision: 14 September, 2023

KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL VS THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TRIVANDRUM  AND ORS. 

Latest Legal News