Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Co-Operative Societies Eligible For Tax Deductions U/S 80P Of The Income Tax Act - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, in a bench comprising Hon'ble Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, has provided crucial clarity on tax deductions for co-operative societies under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The judgment, delivered on September 14, 2023, delves into the interpretation of the term "co-operative bank" and its eligibility for deductions under the Income Tax Act. Supreme Court's , "Section 80P of the Act is a beneficial provision... has to be read liberally in favor of the assessee."

The Supreme Court observed, "Section 80P of the Act is a beneficial provision which was enacted in order to encourage and promote the growth of the co-operative sector generally in the economic life of the country and therefore, has to be read liberally in favor of the assessee."

The case revolved around the Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Limited, an apex co-operative society. The central issue was whether this entity qualified as a "co-operative bank" under the relevant provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (BR Act) and the NABARD Act, 1981, and hence, whether it was entitled to the deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.

  1. Definition of Banking Business: The Court emphasized that a co-operative society must be engaged in banking business as defined in Section 5(b) of the BR Act, 1949. Additionally, a co-operative society must obtain a license under Section 22 of the BR Act, 1949, only if it functions as a co-operative bank and not otherwise.
  2. State Co-operative Bank: The Court noted the significance of being declared a state co-operative bank under the NABARD Act, 1981. It pointed out that the Kerala State Co-operative Bank had been declared as a state co-operative bank by the Kerala State Government, whereas the appellant society had not received such a declaration. This implied that the appellant society was not a state co-operative bank.
  3. Conclusion and Decision: The Supreme Court concluded that although the appellant society was an apex co-operative society, it did not qualify as a "co-operative bank" under the BR Act, 1949, and, therefore, was entitled to the benefit of deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.

This landmark judgment provides much-needed clarity on the eligibility of co-operative societies for tax deductions, ensuring that the provisions of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act are applied judiciously. It highlights the importance of fulfilling specific criteria, including engaging in banking business as defined by law and obtaining the necessary licenses.

The decision of the Supreme Court, which comes after a detailed analysis of the relevant provisions, will have far-reaching implications for co-operative societies across the country.

Date of Decision: 14 September, 2023

KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL VS THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TRIVANDRUM  AND ORS. 

Latest Legal News