MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Co-operative Societies Are Not Exempt From Labour Laws, They Must Comply With General Labour Legislations:  Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that co-operative societies providing healthcare services are not exempt from general labour laws despite being governed by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969.

The judgment addressed the dispute over whether co-operative societies are solely governed by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, and thus exempt from other labour laws, or if they must comply with general labour legislations aimed at welfare and social security. The court held that general labour laws applicable to commercial establishments and other entities also apply to co-operative societies unless explicitly exempted.

The petitioner, Cherplaserry Co-operative Hospital Ltd., represented by its secretary, filed a writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of the Assistant Labour Officer, Ottappalam, to enforce compliance with various labour laws including the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960, and the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, among others. The petitioner contended that being regulated by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, it was exempt from the application of other labour laws.

The court observed that the co-operation falls under the state list, while labour welfare is under the concurrent list, thus both state and central laws are applicable.

Justice Murali Purushothaman pointed out that the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act does not provide a shield against compliance with broader labour welfare measures not specifically covered by it.

The judgment extensively discussed the application of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, Minimum Wages Act, Maternity Benefit Act, and the Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Act to the petitioner.

It was determined that the hospital qualifies as a 'commercial establishment' and hence is subject to the said acts.

Various precedents were cited where the courts had upheld the applicability of labour laws to co-operative societies, emphasizing that co-operative societies do not stand outside the scope of general labour legislations unless specifically stated.

The court dismissed the writ petition, reaffirming that the petitioner is required to comply with the stipulations of the general labour laws. The court underscored that these laws operate in different fields and possess distinct purposes aimed at employee welfare, which are not negated by the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.

Date of Decision: April 11, 2024.

Cherplaserry Co-operative Hospital Ltd. vs. State of Kerala & Ors.

Latest Legal News