Lack Of Title Documents In Lal Dora Land Does Not Relieve Plaintiff From Proving Continuous Possession To Claim Ownership: Delhi High Court Unauthorized Video Recording Of Court Proceedings Without Prior Permission Amounts To Contempt Of Court: Bombay High Court Finality Of Litigation | State Cannot Re-Litigate Settled Decrees By Alleging Collusion After Affirmation Up To Supreme Court: Allahabad High Court SC/ST Act | Court Cannot Determine Conversion Status To Quash FIR Before Completion Of Investigation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Absence Of Manufacturing Activity And Dilapidated Condition Of Premises Constitute Valid Grounds For Closure: Bombay High Court Non-Disclosure Of Existing Insurance Policies In Proposal Form Entitles Insurer To Repudiate Claim: Calcutta High Court Will Interpretation | Bequest Of "Above Said Property" Includes Entire Estate, Not Just Descriptive Portions Mentioned Therein: Delhi High Court Limitation Act | Court Can Balance Equities By Denying Interest For Delay Period In Land Acquisition Appeals: Gujarat High Court Article 21 Constitution Of India | Personal Liberty Of Detenue Cannot Be Curtailed Without Authority Of Law Post-Acquittal: Jharkhand High Court Order 8 Rule 1A CPC | Trial Court Should Not Reject Documents Merely For Delay If Foundation Is Laid In Pleadings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order XXII CPC Applies To SCC Suits; Rule 25 Of U.P. Urban Buildings Rules Does Not Govern Substitution Where Act Is Inapplicable: Allahabad High Court Recruitment Authorities Cannot Insist On Impossible Experience Criteria: Karnataka High Court Rules Against Rejection Of Motor Vehicle Inspector Candidates Order 38 Rule 8 CPC | Claim Petition Cannot Be Allowed Ex-Parte Without Adjudication On Merits: Kerala High Court Succession Certificate Under Section 372 Indian Succession Act Cannot Be Granted When Title Is Subject To Intricate Questions Of Fact And Law: Madras High Court SARFAESI Act | District Magistrate Cannot Adjudicate Disputes Between Borrower And Secured Creditor While Assisting Possession: Madhya Pradesh High Court Termination Based On Caste Status Without Cancellation Of Original Certificate Is Legally Unsustainable: Orissa High Court Section 13 Punjab Village Common Lands Act | Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted In Private Injunction Suits Where Title Against Panchayat Is Not Sought: High Court Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act  | Equal Opportunity Policy Of Employer Is Mandatory; Routine Transfer Policy Must Yield To Special Provisions For Caregivers: Rajasthan High Court Compensation Must Be Just, Not A Pittance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Award In Motor Accident Claim Registration Act | Sub-Registrar Has No Power To Adjudicate Title Or Refuse Registration Based On Unauthorized Layouts: Telangana High Court Section 50 NDPS Act | Failure To Individually Communicate Right To Be Searched Before Gazetted Officer Or Magistrate Vitiates Conviction: Telangana High Court

Co-operative Societies Are Not Exempt From Labour Laws, They Must Comply With General Labour Legislations:  Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that co-operative societies providing healthcare services are not exempt from general labour laws despite being governed by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969.

The judgment addressed the dispute over whether co-operative societies are solely governed by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, and thus exempt from other labour laws, or if they must comply with general labour legislations aimed at welfare and social security. The court held that general labour laws applicable to commercial establishments and other entities also apply to co-operative societies unless explicitly exempted.

The petitioner, Cherplaserry Co-operative Hospital Ltd., represented by its secretary, filed a writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of the Assistant Labour Officer, Ottappalam, to enforce compliance with various labour laws including the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960, and the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, among others. The petitioner contended that being regulated by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, it was exempt from the application of other labour laws.

The court observed that the co-operation falls under the state list, while labour welfare is under the concurrent list, thus both state and central laws are applicable.

Justice Murali Purushothaman pointed out that the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act does not provide a shield against compliance with broader labour welfare measures not specifically covered by it.

The judgment extensively discussed the application of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, Minimum Wages Act, Maternity Benefit Act, and the Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Act to the petitioner.

It was determined that the hospital qualifies as a 'commercial establishment' and hence is subject to the said acts.

Various precedents were cited where the courts had upheld the applicability of labour laws to co-operative societies, emphasizing that co-operative societies do not stand outside the scope of general labour legislations unless specifically stated.

The court dismissed the writ petition, reaffirming that the petitioner is required to comply with the stipulations of the general labour laws. The court underscored that these laws operate in different fields and possess distinct purposes aimed at employee welfare, which are not negated by the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.

Date of Decision: April 11, 2024.

Cherplaserry Co-operative Hospital Ltd. vs. State of Kerala & Ors.

Latest Legal News