No Evidence Prevails Unless ‘Conclusive, Convincing, and Beyond Reasonable Doubt’: Calcutta High Court Modifies Assault Convictions” "Fraudulent Intentions Clear as Day": Rajasthan High Court Denies Bail in ₹40 Crore Commodity Trading Scam Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail to Former Minister in Money Laundering Case Mere Apology Insufficient to Negate Criminal Liability for Cyber Harassment: Madras High Court Mere Criminal Antecedents Not Sufficient to Deny Bail; Long Incarceration and Completion of Investigation Warrant Bail: Kerala High Court Justice Cannot Be Denied When Plaintiff Proves Right, Title, and Interest in Property, Says Calcutta High Court Permanent Injunction Granted Against Government for Failure to Follow Mandatory Rule 3 Notice: Andhra Pradesh High Court Circumstantial Evidence Must Form an Unbroken Chain: P&H High Court Validates Conviction under Sections 302/34 IPC "Right to Be Forgotten Must Prevail Over Freedom of Expression in Acquittal Cases," Rules Delhi High Court Unjust Enrichment Cannot Be the Characteristic of a Government: Kerala High Court Orders 12% Interest on Delayed Payments Vague and Omnibus Statements Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Alleging Cruelty and Forced Miscarriage State Law Governs Court Fees Refunds in Mediation Settlements, But Refund Allowed as Discretionary Relief: Supreme Court Death Was Homicidal, Not Suicidal: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wife's Murder Case Land Compensation | Market Value Determined by the Reference Court Is Lawful and Reasonable: Andhra Pradesh High Court Cal High Court Quashes Wilful Defaulter Declarations, Cites Procedural Violations and Unreliable Evidence Taxation Law | When tax liability arises solely due to retrospective amendments, waiver of interest is warranted: Punjab and Haryana High Court Civil Authorities Not Required to Be Impleaded in Bail Applications: Supreme Court Clarifies Bail Procedures for Foreign Nationals Compensation Must Address Long-Term Needs and Recovery: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Accident Victim to ₹48 Lakhs Criminal Law Cannot Be Misused for Civil Matters: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against MLA in Goa Property Dispute Minor Contradictions in Testimonies Not Sufficient to Overturn Convictions: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Kerala Political Clash Murder Case

Co-operative Societies Are Not Exempt From Labour Laws, They Must Comply With General Labour Legislations:  Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that co-operative societies providing healthcare services are not exempt from general labour laws despite being governed by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969.

The judgment addressed the dispute over whether co-operative societies are solely governed by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, and thus exempt from other labour laws, or if they must comply with general labour legislations aimed at welfare and social security. The court held that general labour laws applicable to commercial establishments and other entities also apply to co-operative societies unless explicitly exempted.

The petitioner, Cherplaserry Co-operative Hospital Ltd., represented by its secretary, filed a writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of the Assistant Labour Officer, Ottappalam, to enforce compliance with various labour laws including the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960, and the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, among others. The petitioner contended that being regulated by the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, it was exempt from the application of other labour laws.

The court observed that the co-operation falls under the state list, while labour welfare is under the concurrent list, thus both state and central laws are applicable.

Justice Murali Purushothaman pointed out that the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act does not provide a shield against compliance with broader labour welfare measures not specifically covered by it.

The judgment extensively discussed the application of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, Minimum Wages Act, Maternity Benefit Act, and the Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Act to the petitioner.

It was determined that the hospital qualifies as a 'commercial establishment' and hence is subject to the said acts.

Various precedents were cited where the courts had upheld the applicability of labour laws to co-operative societies, emphasizing that co-operative societies do not stand outside the scope of general labour legislations unless specifically stated.

The court dismissed the writ petition, reaffirming that the petitioner is required to comply with the stipulations of the general labour laws. The court underscored that these laws operate in different fields and possess distinct purposes aimed at employee welfare, which are not negated by the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.

Date of Decision: April 11, 2024.

Cherplaserry Co-operative Hospital Ltd. vs. State of Kerala & Ors.

Similar News