Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Civil Nature of Dispute - Continuation of the Complaint Shall Be Gross Misuse of Process of the Law High Court of Punjab and Haryana Quashes Criminal Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in a significant ruling, has quashed the criminal proceedings in a property dispute case. The Court observed that the dispute was of a civil nature and continuing with criminal proceedings would constitute a "gross misuse of the process of the law."

The case, titled 'Avtar Singh and another v. State of Punjab and others,' revolved around a property dispute. The complainant, Ajmer Kaur, alleged that the petitioners, along with others, fraudulently executed a sale deed of a property that she claimed to have bought. However, the petitioners argued that they legally inherited the property and sold it. The matter led to criminal proceedings against the petitioners under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including forgery and fraud.

Justice Deepak Gupta, while assessing the case, observed, "No criminal element can be found, so as to invoke any of the provisions of IPC." The Court noted that the petitioners had inherited the property and their sale deed could not be deemed fraudulent. Additionally, the Court pointed out that civil courts had already adjudicated upon the legality of the sale deeds involved and found both to be valid. Justice Gupta remarked, "Continuation of the complaint in question shall be gross misuse of process of the law."

The judgment underscored the distinction between civil and criminal disputes. The Court applied principles of law that prevent the misuse of criminal proceedings in matters that are essentially civil disputes. The relevant sections of the IPC pertaining to fraud and forgery were considered, but the Court found them inapplicable in this civil matter.

The High Court quashed the criminal complaint No. 212/1/05 dated 15.09.2005, titled as ‘Ajmer Kaur v. Surjit Singh and another’, along with the summoning order dated 28.09.2011 and all subsequent proceedings.

Date of Decision: January 30, 2024

Avtar Singh and another v. State of Punjab and others

Latest Legal News