Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Civil Nature of Dispute - Continuation of the Complaint Shall Be Gross Misuse of Process of the Law High Court of Punjab and Haryana Quashes Criminal Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in a significant ruling, has quashed the criminal proceedings in a property dispute case. The Court observed that the dispute was of a civil nature and continuing with criminal proceedings would constitute a "gross misuse of the process of the law."

The case, titled 'Avtar Singh and another v. State of Punjab and others,' revolved around a property dispute. The complainant, Ajmer Kaur, alleged that the petitioners, along with others, fraudulently executed a sale deed of a property that she claimed to have bought. However, the petitioners argued that they legally inherited the property and sold it. The matter led to criminal proceedings against the petitioners under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including forgery and fraud.

Justice Deepak Gupta, while assessing the case, observed, "No criminal element can be found, so as to invoke any of the provisions of IPC." The Court noted that the petitioners had inherited the property and their sale deed could not be deemed fraudulent. Additionally, the Court pointed out that civil courts had already adjudicated upon the legality of the sale deeds involved and found both to be valid. Justice Gupta remarked, "Continuation of the complaint in question shall be gross misuse of process of the law."

The judgment underscored the distinction between civil and criminal disputes. The Court applied principles of law that prevent the misuse of criminal proceedings in matters that are essentially civil disputes. The relevant sections of the IPC pertaining to fraud and forgery were considered, but the Court found them inapplicable in this civil matter.

The High Court quashed the criminal complaint No. 212/1/05 dated 15.09.2005, titled as ‘Ajmer Kaur v. Surjit Singh and another’, along with the summoning order dated 28.09.2011 and all subsequent proceedings.

Date of Decision: January 30, 2024

Avtar Singh and another v. State of Punjab and others

Latest Legal News