UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Civil Nature of Dispute - Continuation of the Complaint Shall Be Gross Misuse of Process of the Law High Court of Punjab and Haryana Quashes Criminal Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in a significant ruling, has quashed the criminal proceedings in a property dispute case. The Court observed that the dispute was of a civil nature and continuing with criminal proceedings would constitute a "gross misuse of the process of the law."

The case, titled 'Avtar Singh and another v. State of Punjab and others,' revolved around a property dispute. The complainant, Ajmer Kaur, alleged that the petitioners, along with others, fraudulently executed a sale deed of a property that she claimed to have bought. However, the petitioners argued that they legally inherited the property and sold it. The matter led to criminal proceedings against the petitioners under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including forgery and fraud.

Justice Deepak Gupta, while assessing the case, observed, "No criminal element can be found, so as to invoke any of the provisions of IPC." The Court noted that the petitioners had inherited the property and their sale deed could not be deemed fraudulent. Additionally, the Court pointed out that civil courts had already adjudicated upon the legality of the sale deeds involved and found both to be valid. Justice Gupta remarked, "Continuation of the complaint in question shall be gross misuse of process of the law."

The judgment underscored the distinction between civil and criminal disputes. The Court applied principles of law that prevent the misuse of criminal proceedings in matters that are essentially civil disputes. The relevant sections of the IPC pertaining to fraud and forgery were considered, but the Court found them inapplicable in this civil matter.

The High Court quashed the criminal complaint No. 212/1/05 dated 15.09.2005, titled as ‘Ajmer Kaur v. Surjit Singh and another’, along with the summoning order dated 28.09.2011 and all subsequent proceedings.

Date of Decision: January 30, 2024

Avtar Singh and another v. State of Punjab and others

Latest Legal News