Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Child’s Welfare Paramount,” Bombay High Court Annuls Adoption Order After Failed Parent-Child Bonding

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court, under Justice R.I. Chagla, annulled an adoption order, underscoring the overriding importance of a child’s welfare in adoption cases. The case involved the Bal Asha Trust of Mumbai petitioning against the adoption by Ashu Singhal and Riddhi Singhal, due to significant bonding and care issues with the adopted child.

This judgment pivoted on the legal principle that the best interest and welfare of the child are of utmost importance in adoption cases. It addressed the rare scenario of annulling an adoption due to the failure of establishing a parental bond.

After adopting a male minor child on August 17, 2023, the Singhal couple faced challenges in bonding with the child and managing his behavioral and health issues. This led to their request for annulling the adoption, a situation the court had to carefully assess in light of the child’s welfare.

Justice Chagla pointedly observed, “The welfare of the child is of paramount importance.” The Court meticulously reviewed counseling reports, the petitioner’s affidavit, and the scrutiny officer’s findings. It noted the inability of the adoptive parents to emotionally connect with the child and manage his health concerns, despite efforts and guidance from the adoption agency.

The judgment was grounded in the principles of the Adoption Regulations. It emphasized the child’s welfare as the central concern, aligning with the guidelines of CARA in adoption matters.

The Court decided to annul the previous adoption order, directing CARA to list the child as ‘Free for Adoption’ again. It also ordered the return of a financial investment made by the adoptive parents for the child’s benefit, as per the earlier court directive.

Date of Decision: January 25, 2024

Bal Asha Trust, Mumbai Vs. Ashu Singhal & Anr.

 

Latest Legal News