Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Child’s Welfare Paramount,” Bombay High Court Annuls Adoption Order After Failed Parent-Child Bonding

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court, under Justice R.I. Chagla, annulled an adoption order, underscoring the overriding importance of a child’s welfare in adoption cases. The case involved the Bal Asha Trust of Mumbai petitioning against the adoption by Ashu Singhal and Riddhi Singhal, due to significant bonding and care issues with the adopted child.

This judgment pivoted on the legal principle that the best interest and welfare of the child are of utmost importance in adoption cases. It addressed the rare scenario of annulling an adoption due to the failure of establishing a parental bond.

After adopting a male minor child on August 17, 2023, the Singhal couple faced challenges in bonding with the child and managing his behavioral and health issues. This led to their request for annulling the adoption, a situation the court had to carefully assess in light of the child’s welfare.

Justice Chagla pointedly observed, “The welfare of the child is of paramount importance.” The Court meticulously reviewed counseling reports, the petitioner’s affidavit, and the scrutiny officer’s findings. It noted the inability of the adoptive parents to emotionally connect with the child and manage his health concerns, despite efforts and guidance from the adoption agency.

The judgment was grounded in the principles of the Adoption Regulations. It emphasized the child’s welfare as the central concern, aligning with the guidelines of CARA in adoption matters.

The Court decided to annul the previous adoption order, directing CARA to list the child as ‘Free for Adoption’ again. It also ordered the return of a financial investment made by the adoptive parents for the child’s benefit, as per the earlier court directive.

Date of Decision: January 25, 2024

Bal Asha Trust, Mumbai Vs. Ashu Singhal & Anr.

 

Latest Legal News