MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Child's Right to Both Parents' Affection, Orders Video Conferencing Interactions: Delhi HC

04 September 2024 11:05 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment pronounced on August 17, 2023, the Delhi High Court underscored the paramount importance of a child's right to receive affection from both parents, upholding the significance of maintaining a strong parent-child bond even in cases of spatial separation. The verdict, rendered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, came as a response to an appeal lodged by Siddharth Govindani against a Family Court order declining his application for temporary custody of his minor child.

The High Court, after a meticulous analysis of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, emphasized that a child's welfare and balanced growth must remain at the forefront of such disputes. The judgment cited a series of Supreme Court precedents that highlighted a child's inherent right to receive affection from both parents. The bench stressed that while permanent custody matters are under consideration, the child's access to both parents should not be curtailed.

High Court stated, "The child's best interest requires that he should have guidance and affection of his father in his formative years, for which he should have access to his father to develop affection." In a digital age, the court further acknowledged the practicality of using technology to facilitate interactions. Accordingly, the court ordered video conferencing interactions between the appellant-father and the minor child every Saturday and Sunday, during a flexible one-hour time frame from 11:00 am to 12:00 noon (Indian time).

The ruling also directed the learned Principal Judge of the Family Court to expedite the pending application related to custody and consider formulating a co-parenting plan that ensures effective and meaningful interactions between the father and the son. The court noted that the child's age and circumstances warranted a balanced approach to maintain the parent-child bond, even in the face of geographical separation.

This landmark decision serves as a precedent, highlighting the courts' commitment to safeguarding a child's well-being and emotional growth by upholding the importance of maintaining connections with both parents, regardless of physical distances. The judgment aims to strike a harmonious balance between the child's best interests and a father's affectionate involvement in the child's upbringing.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

SIDDHARTH GOVINDANI vs LEEPAKSHI

Latest Legal News