Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Child's Right to Both Parents' Affection, Orders Video Conferencing Interactions: Delhi HC

04 September 2024 11:05 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment pronounced on August 17, 2023, the Delhi High Court underscored the paramount importance of a child's right to receive affection from both parents, upholding the significance of maintaining a strong parent-child bond even in cases of spatial separation. The verdict, rendered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, came as a response to an appeal lodged by Siddharth Govindani against a Family Court order declining his application for temporary custody of his minor child.

The High Court, after a meticulous analysis of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, emphasized that a child's welfare and balanced growth must remain at the forefront of such disputes. The judgment cited a series of Supreme Court precedents that highlighted a child's inherent right to receive affection from both parents. The bench stressed that while permanent custody matters are under consideration, the child's access to both parents should not be curtailed.

High Court stated, "The child's best interest requires that he should have guidance and affection of his father in his formative years, for which he should have access to his father to develop affection." In a digital age, the court further acknowledged the practicality of using technology to facilitate interactions. Accordingly, the court ordered video conferencing interactions between the appellant-father and the minor child every Saturday and Sunday, during a flexible one-hour time frame from 11:00 am to 12:00 noon (Indian time).

The ruling also directed the learned Principal Judge of the Family Court to expedite the pending application related to custody and consider formulating a co-parenting plan that ensures effective and meaningful interactions between the father and the son. The court noted that the child's age and circumstances warranted a balanced approach to maintain the parent-child bond, even in the face of geographical separation.

This landmark decision serves as a precedent, highlighting the courts' commitment to safeguarding a child's well-being and emotional growth by upholding the importance of maintaining connections with both parents, regardless of physical distances. The judgment aims to strike a harmonious balance between the child's best interests and a father's affectionate involvement in the child's upbringing.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

SIDDHARTH GOVINDANI vs LEEPAKSHI

Latest Legal News