Property Allotted In Lieu Of Ancestral Land Left In Pakistan Retains Coparcenary Character; Karta Cannot Gift It Away: Punjab & Haryana HC Bail Applicant Under 'Solemn Obligation' To Disclose Criminal History; Material Suppression Disentitles Discretionary Relief: Orissa High Court Mother Surreptitiously Marrying Away Daughter Without Father’s Knowledge Amount To Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Grants Divorce Time Is Generally Not The Essence Of Contract In Sale Of Immovable Property; Unilateral Notice Cannot Alter Mutually Agreed Terms: Himachal Pradesh High Court Mere Use Of Surname No Defence If Adoption Is Dishonest & Causes Confusion In Pharma Trade: Delhi High Court Restrains 'Reddy Pharmaceuticals' Complainant’s Failure To Provide Specific Loan Details & Evidence Of Parties' Involvement In Ponzi Scheme Rebuts Section 139 NI Act Presumption: Calcutta High Court Statutory Mandate Of Section 17-B: Payment Of Minimum Wages Means Revised Rates From Time To Time, Not Frozen Amount: Delhi High Court Reporting Court Proceedings & Good Faith Complaints To Authorities Not Defamation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Order Appointment Obtained Via Fraud Vitiates Initial Entry; Article 311 Protection Not Available To Such Employees: Allahabad High Court Surviving Spouse’s Elevation To Second In Line Of Succession Not ‘Manifestly Arbitrary’: Bombay High Court Upholds Goa Succession Act Amendments Patent Rights Stand Exhausted Once Components Are Sourced From Authorized Market Dealers; Royalty Cannot Be Calculated On Entire Product: Delhi High Court FCI Cannot Unilaterally Reduce Rent Or Recover 'Excess' Payment Without Landlord's Consent & Notice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Judicial Sanctity Cannot Be Given To Adulterous Relationships; No Habeas Corpus For Married Woman Living With Husband: Himachal Pradesh High Court Recoveries From Open Spaces Without Proof Of Concealment Don't Qualify Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Supreme Court Large Time Gap In 'Last Seen Together' Theory Snaps Chain Of Circumstances; Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Non-Recovery Of Mobile Phone Or Video Not Fatal To Criminal Intimidation Charge If Victim's Testimony Is Credible: Supreme Court Threat To Upload Private Video Online Violates Woman's Sexual Autonomy, Amounts To 'Imputing Unchastity' Under Sec 506 IPC: Supreme Court Intention To Kill Essential For Section 307 IPC Conviction; Nature Of Injury Not Sole Determinant: Supreme Court Intention To Commit Murder Cannot Be Presumed Merely Because Injury Was Dangerous To Life: Supreme Court Alters Conviction To Section 325 IPC Supreme Court Cancels Bail Of Accused Who Absconded For 42 Days Post-Bail Revocation; Says Contumacious Conduct Bars Fresh Relief High Court Cannot Grant Fresh Bail By Ignoring Supreme Court’s Earlier Order Cancelling Bail Without Change In Circumstances: Supreme Court Mutation Entries Supported By Registered Sale Deeds For Long Period Relevant To Establish Possession: Supreme Court Allegation Of Fraud In Registered Documents Must Be Supported By Foundational Facts; Adverse Inference Drawn If Plaintiff Avoids Witness Box: Supreme Court Commercial Courts Must Assign Reasons For Not Passing Conditional Orders In Summary Judgment Applications: Calcutta High Court Friendly Loan Without Commercial Consideration Not A 'Legally Enforceable Debt' Under Section 138 NI Act: Jharkhand High Court Commercial Courts Act: ₹3 Lakh ‘Specified Value’ Amendment Is Self-Operative; No Separate Govt Notification Required: Andhra Pradesh HC Full Bench Drug Inspector’s Prosecution Voids If Specific Area Of Jurisdiction Is Not Notified In Official Gazette: Kerala High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC | Photostat Copies Of Sale Deeds Not Admissible As Additional Evidence To Fill Gaps In Trial Stage: Punjab & Haryana HC

Children of Indian Citizens Adopted Abroad Cannot Be Left Marooned: Karnataka High Court Directs CARA to Issue No Objection Certificate for Cross-Border Adoption

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Karnataka emphasized the need for legal sanctity in India for children adopted abroad by Indian citizens, stating, “Children of Indian Citizens Adopted Abroad Cannot Be Left Marooned.”

The petitioners, Indian citizens residing in Kenya, had adopted a child in Uganda. Seeking legal recognition in India, they approached CARA but faced inaction. The matter revolves around cross-border adoption and the complexities arising due to India being a signatory to the Hague Convention, while Uganda is not.

Facts and Issues: The petitioners, who lived in Uganda from 2011 to 2018, legally adopted a child there. Their requests to CARA for recognizing the adoption in India were not responded to, leading to this legal battle. The key issue was the legal recognition of an adoption process completed in a non-Hague Convention country by Indian citizens.

Legal Framework Applicability: The Juvenile Justice Act and CARA Regulations were applicable. However, the unique situation of the petitioners, involving a non-Hague signatory country, led the court to interpret the laws innovatively.

Judicial Review and Adaptation of Laws: The court highlighted its role in adapting laws to unique situations, citing the English case of Seaford Estate V. Asher.

Foreign Judgments in India: Applying Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court recognized the Ugandan court’s judgments as conclusive, provided certain conditions are met.

CARA’s Role and Responsibilities: The court directed CARA to consider the petitioners’ representation and to issue a No Objection Certificate, harmonizing international and national legal norms.

Decision: The court ordered CARA to process the representation by the petitioners and grant a No Objection Certificate for the adoption within six weeks.

Date of Decision: 26th March 2024

Sri Ravi Kumar C. & Smt. B. Tanuja v. Central Adoption Resource Authority & State Adoption Resource Authority

 

Latest Legal News