Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

"Charge Sheet in Language Other Than Court's Not Illegal": Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in VYAPAM Scam Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 25, 2023 - In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has set aside High Court orders that mandated the translation of charge sheets into the language of the Court. The apex court clarified that a charge sheet filed in a language other than the Court's language is "not illegal."

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal, stated, "Absence of specific provision in CrPC requiring charge sheet to be in language of Court; proceedings not vitiated even if such requirement is read into Section 173." [Para 18]

The case revolved around the language of charge sheets filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in relation to offences arising out of the VYAPAM Scam in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents had argued that they were entitled to charge sheets in Hindi, the language of the Court as determined by Section 272 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The Supreme Court observed that the CrPC does not specifically require charge sheets to be in the language of the Court. "There is no such requirement laid down in respect of the report/charge sheet under Section 173 of CrPC," the bench noted. [Para 15]

The Court also emphasized that errors, omissions, or irregularities do not automatically vitiate proceedings unless they result in a failure of justice. "The test of failure of justice will have to be applied in such a case as laid down in Section 465 of CrPC," the judgment read. [Para 17]

The Court further noted that with the availability of various software and Artificial Intelligence tools for making translations, providing translations will not be difficult. However, it added that "no one can claim a default bail" on the ground that the charge sheet is in a language other than the Court's. [Para 19]

Supreme Court found that the respondents were educated and understood English. "Hence, in the facts of the cases in hand, it cannot be said that a non-supply of translation of the charge sheet and other documents to the accused in both appeals will occasion a failure of justice," the judgment concluded. [Para 22]

The Supreme Court's decision is expected to have wide-ranging implications, especially for central agencies like the National Investigation Agency and the Central Bureau of Investigation, which often deal with cases having wide ramifications.

 Date of Decision: August 25, 2023

Central Bureau of Investigation vs Narottam Dhakad & Anr       

 

Similar News