Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

"Charge Sheet in Language Other Than Court's Not Illegal": Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in VYAPAM Scam Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 25, 2023 - In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has set aside High Court orders that mandated the translation of charge sheets into the language of the Court. The apex court clarified that a charge sheet filed in a language other than the Court's language is "not illegal."

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal, stated, "Absence of specific provision in CrPC requiring charge sheet to be in language of Court; proceedings not vitiated even if such requirement is read into Section 173." [Para 18]

The case revolved around the language of charge sheets filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in relation to offences arising out of the VYAPAM Scam in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents had argued that they were entitled to charge sheets in Hindi, the language of the Court as determined by Section 272 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The Supreme Court observed that the CrPC does not specifically require charge sheets to be in the language of the Court. "There is no such requirement laid down in respect of the report/charge sheet under Section 173 of CrPC," the bench noted. [Para 15]

The Court also emphasized that errors, omissions, or irregularities do not automatically vitiate proceedings unless they result in a failure of justice. "The test of failure of justice will have to be applied in such a case as laid down in Section 465 of CrPC," the judgment read. [Para 17]

The Court further noted that with the availability of various software and Artificial Intelligence tools for making translations, providing translations will not be difficult. However, it added that "no one can claim a default bail" on the ground that the charge sheet is in a language other than the Court's. [Para 19]

Supreme Court found that the respondents were educated and understood English. "Hence, in the facts of the cases in hand, it cannot be said that a non-supply of translation of the charge sheet and other documents to the accused in both appeals will occasion a failure of justice," the judgment concluded. [Para 22]

The Supreme Court's decision is expected to have wide-ranging implications, especially for central agencies like the National Investigation Agency and the Central Bureau of Investigation, which often deal with cases having wide ramifications.

 Date of Decision: August 25, 2023

Central Bureau of Investigation vs Narottam Dhakad & Anr       

 

Latest Legal News