Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

"Charge Sheet in Language Other Than Court's Not Illegal": Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in VYAPAM Scam Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 25, 2023 - In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has set aside High Court orders that mandated the translation of charge sheets into the language of the Court. The apex court clarified that a charge sheet filed in a language other than the Court's language is "not illegal."

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal, stated, "Absence of specific provision in CrPC requiring charge sheet to be in language of Court; proceedings not vitiated even if such requirement is read into Section 173." [Para 18]

The case revolved around the language of charge sheets filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in relation to offences arising out of the VYAPAM Scam in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents had argued that they were entitled to charge sheets in Hindi, the language of the Court as determined by Section 272 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The Supreme Court observed that the CrPC does not specifically require charge sheets to be in the language of the Court. "There is no such requirement laid down in respect of the report/charge sheet under Section 173 of CrPC," the bench noted. [Para 15]

The Court also emphasized that errors, omissions, or irregularities do not automatically vitiate proceedings unless they result in a failure of justice. "The test of failure of justice will have to be applied in such a case as laid down in Section 465 of CrPC," the judgment read. [Para 17]

The Court further noted that with the availability of various software and Artificial Intelligence tools for making translations, providing translations will not be difficult. However, it added that "no one can claim a default bail" on the ground that the charge sheet is in a language other than the Court's. [Para 19]

Supreme Court found that the respondents were educated and understood English. "Hence, in the facts of the cases in hand, it cannot be said that a non-supply of translation of the charge sheet and other documents to the accused in both appeals will occasion a failure of justice," the judgment concluded. [Para 22]

The Supreme Court's decision is expected to have wide-ranging implications, especially for central agencies like the National Investigation Agency and the Central Bureau of Investigation, which often deal with cases having wide ramifications.

 Date of Decision: August 25, 2023

Central Bureau of Investigation vs Narottam Dhakad & Anr       

 

Similar News