NDPS | Mentioning FIR Number On Memos Before Registration Makes the Entire Recovery Suspect: Himachal Pradesh High Court MACT | Once Deceased Is Proven To Be Skilled Worker, Deputy Commissioner's Wage Notification Is Applicable: P&H HC Bank’s Technical Excuses Can’t Override Employee’s Right to Ex Gratia Under Old Circulars: Bombay High Court Slams Canara Bank’s Rejection of Claim Once Worker Files Affidavit of Unemployment, Burden Shifts to Employer to Prove Gainful Employment: Delhi High Court Grants 17B Relief Despite 12-Year Delay Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Limitation Act | Quasi-Judicial Bodies Cannot Invoke Section 5 Principles Without Express Statutory Grant: Supreme Court Arbitration Act | Commencement of Proceedings Triggered by Notice Receipt, Not Section 11 Filing: Supreme Court Strong and Cogent Evidence Must Exist at the Threshold to Deny Bail Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court Appellate Court Under Section 37 Cannot Sit in Appeal Over Arbitral Award on Merits: Supreme Court Affidavit Ratifying Power of Attorney Cannot Be Disowned Later: Supreme Court Orders Specific Performance Despite Earlier Revocation Claims No Law Empowers a Corporation to Haunt a Retiree: Supreme Court Quashes Post-Retirement Disciplinary Action for Want of Jurisdiction Mere Expectation of Higher Bids Can't Justify Cancelling a Valid Auction: Supreme Court Quashes GDA’s Arbitrary Rejection of Highest Bidder Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21, Even in Grave Economic Offences: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Arvind Dham in ₹673 Crore PMLA Case Article 14 | ‘Rules of the Game Cannot Be Changed Midstream’: Supreme Court Quashes Punjab’s Modified Sports Quota Policy for MBBS Admissions Rules of the Game Cannot Be Changed Midway: Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Retrospective Recruitment Amendment "Imaginary Ghost" - Court Permits Karthigai Deepam at Thiruparankundram ‘Deepathoon’: Madras High Court 353 IPC | Continuing Prosecution Against Citizens Despite Statutory Findings of Police Atrocities Is Abuse of Process: Kerala High Court Court Cannot Compel Plaintiff to Continue Suit Where No Liberty to File Fresh Suit is Sought: Bombay High Court Claim for Demurrage is Not a Crystallized Debt—Only an Unadjudicated Right to Sue: Andhra Pradesh High Court Declared Foreign Nationals Have No Right to Reside in India: Gauhati High Court Upholds Expulsion of Bangladeshi Woman Without Requiring Deportation Protocols

Caste Certificate Misrepresentation Not Tolerated – Land Sale Transactions Scrutinized: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India, led by Justices Vikram Nath and Rajesh Bindal, made a significant ruling on December 8, 2023, in the case 2023 INSC 1057. The Court overturned the High Court’s judgment that had upheld the cancellation of a caste certificate belonging to respondent No. 15, impacting related land sale transactions under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.

The case centered on the complex issue of the cancellation of a caste certificate and its implications on land transactions. Justice Rajesh Bindal, in his judgment, emphasized the meticulous examination of the case’s details, saying, “The primary issue in the case in hand is with reference to the caste certificate issued to the respondent No. 15.” The Court delved into the discrepancies and inconsistencies in the claims about the caste status of respondent No. 15 and his late father, shedding light on the potential misuse of caste certificates in land transactions.

A critical point of discussion was the jurisdiction of the Committee concerning the cancellation of caste certificates. The Court observed that, although not explicitly mentioned in Section 8A of the West Bengal Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Identification) Act, 1994, the procedural law amendment allowed the Committee to retrospectively examine such cases.

Perhaps the most striking aspect of the judgment was the Court’s stance on the conduct of the respondents. The Court noted, “Considering the conduct of the private respondents... it will be an exercise in futility to remit the matter back to any authority for examination as we do not find any merit in the claim of respondent No. 15.” This statement underlines the Court’s commitment to ensuring that legal provisions meant to protect disadvantaged groups are not misused for personal gain.

This decision sets a significant precedent, reinforcing the legal system’s intolerance towards the misrepresentation of caste status and its exploitation in land sale transactions. It also emphasizes the importance of the integrity and accuracy of legal documents in judicial processes.

Date of Decision: 8th December 2023

M/s DARVELL INVESTMENT AND LEASING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS

Latest Legal News