Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Case Transfer: Convenience of Wife Paramount in Guardianship, Not Limited to Divorce Cases Only: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling emphasizing the convenience of mothers in guardianship disputes, the High Court of Kerala has directed the transfer of a case from the Family Court in Kozhikode to Manjeri. The judgement, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice C. Jayachandran, highlights the importance of considering the mother's circumstances in legal proceedings involving the welfare of children.

The petitioner, Mubassira, sought the transfer of O.P.(G&W) No.720/2023 citing financial and health constraints, which made it challenging for her to travel to Kozhikode. She pointed out that the distance to the Family Court in Manjeri was significantly shorter compared to Kozhikode. The respondents, however, contended that the difference in distance was minimal and that the jurisdiction should be based on where the minor resides, as per Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1980.

Justice Jayachandran, in his order, stated, "The settled legal position with respect to the requirement to take into account the convenience of the wife would equally apply in respect to matters under the Guardians and Wards Act as well; and the same is not confined to the divorce petitions preferred under the respective personal law." This observation underscores the court's approach in balancing legal jurisdiction with practical considerations in family law cases.

The court also addressed the respondents' argument regarding the child's education in Kozhikode, stating that this was not sufficient to oppose the transfer motion. The judgment further clarified that the presence of the minor would not be required at every court date, thus considering the child's welfare and educational needs.

Date of Decision: 17th January 2024

xxx vs xxx 

 

Latest Legal News