Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Calcutta High Court Quashes Case Against Wife - Taking care of one’s parents is an emotional and loving act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kolkata, October 5, 2023 – In a landmark judgment today, the Hon’ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) of the High Court at Calcutta quashed the criminal proceedings against Sampa Deb (Basu), a primary school teacher embroiled in a case related to marital discord and the place of residence.

The case, which involved charges under Sections 341, 323, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, was primarily centered around the dispute concerning the family’s place of stay. Notably, the petitioner is the sole earning member of her family and has a mother who is 100% blind. Her husband, who is not employed and has no surviving parents, resides with the petitioner’s family.

The Court observed, "Taking care of one’s parents Is an emotional and loving act. No force in the world can stop a child from doing it and no child can be forced to do so if he or she does not want to.” The judgment emphasized the petitioner’s filial duty and the circumstances that supported her case.

During the hearing, it was revealed that the case diary contained no material to substantiate the alleged offenses against Sampa Deb (Basu). As a result, the court deemed continuing the proceedings as an “abuse of the process of law.”

The revisional application was allowed, and all charges against the petitioner were quashed. All connected applications were also disposed of, and any interim orders were vacated. A copy of the judgment will be sent to the Trial Court for compliance.

This case sets a precedent in recognizing the emotional and familial aspects involved in legal disputes, particularly those involving parents and children. It also serves as a reminder of the role of the judiciary in examining the broader context of familial responsibilities when making legal decisions.                                 

Date of Decision: 05.10.2023

Sampa Deb (Basu) vs State of West Bengal & Anr.   

Latest Legal News