Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Calcutta High Court Quashes Case Against Wife - Taking care of one’s parents is an emotional and loving act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kolkata, October 5, 2023 – In a landmark judgment today, the Hon’ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) of the High Court at Calcutta quashed the criminal proceedings against Sampa Deb (Basu), a primary school teacher embroiled in a case related to marital discord and the place of residence.

The case, which involved charges under Sections 341, 323, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, was primarily centered around the dispute concerning the family’s place of stay. Notably, the petitioner is the sole earning member of her family and has a mother who is 100% blind. Her husband, who is not employed and has no surviving parents, resides with the petitioner’s family.

The Court observed, "Taking care of one’s parents Is an emotional and loving act. No force in the world can stop a child from doing it and no child can be forced to do so if he or she does not want to.” The judgment emphasized the petitioner’s filial duty and the circumstances that supported her case.

During the hearing, it was revealed that the case diary contained no material to substantiate the alleged offenses against Sampa Deb (Basu). As a result, the court deemed continuing the proceedings as an “abuse of the process of law.”

The revisional application was allowed, and all charges against the petitioner were quashed. All connected applications were also disposed of, and any interim orders were vacated. A copy of the judgment will be sent to the Trial Court for compliance.

This case sets a precedent in recognizing the emotional and familial aspects involved in legal disputes, particularly those involving parents and children. It also serves as a reminder of the role of the judiciary in examining the broader context of familial responsibilities when making legal decisions.                                 

Date of Decision: 05.10.2023

Sampa Deb (Basu) vs State of West Bengal & Anr.   

Latest Legal News