Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

Calcutta High Court Orders “Pay and Recover” in Fatal Accident Case Due to Lapsed Driver’s License

03 September 2024 2:28 PM

By: sayum


The Calcutta High Court has upheld the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in a fatal road accident case, while also allowing the National Insurance Company Ltd. To recover the compensation amount from the vehicle owner. The judgment, delivered by Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul), emphasized the significance of adhering to the terms of the insurance policy, particularly concerning the validity of the driver’s license at the time of the accident.

On April 22, 2009, Brajodulal Sarkar was riding his bicycle near Chakvrigu when he was struck by a bus operating under the name “Patikha.” The bus, driven at high speed, veered off the road and hit Sarkar, who sustained severe injuries and later succumbed to them at Balurghat District Hospital. Sarkar, an upper division clerk earning Rs. 22,243 per month, was the sole breadwinner for his family. The claimants, including his wife and children, filed for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The Tribunal had initially awarded a compensation of Rs. 12,75,108 to the claimants, with an additional Rs. 5,000 for loss of consortium. The owner of the offending vehicle did not contest the case, leading to an ex-parte decision against him. The insurance company, however, contested the award, citing that the driver did not possess a valid license at the time of the accident.

The High Court examined the case, noting that the driver’s license had lapsed on November 11, 2008, and was only renewed on June 22, 2009, thus rendering the license invalid at the time of the accident on April 22, 2009. The court held that this lapse constituted a clear violation of the insurance policy terms, justifying the insurance company’s right to recover the compensation from the vehicle owner.

In its legal analysis, the court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Balu Krishna Chavan vs. The Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. (2022), which established that while insurance companies are generally not liable to pay compensation in cases of invalid licenses, they may be directed to “pay and recover” the amount from the vehicle owner to serve the ends of justice. The High Court applied this principle, modifying the Tribunal’s award to allow the insurance company to recover the compensation paid to the claimants from the vehicle owner.

The judgment reinforces the strict enforcement of insurance policy terms, particularly regarding the validity of the driver’s license. By allowing the insurance company to recover the compensation from the vehicle owner, the court has underscored the importance of compliance with legal requirements in motor vehicle operation. This ruling is likely to impact future cases where similar lapses in policy conditions are identified, ensuring that justice is served while maintaining the integrity of insurance contracts.

Date of Decision: August 22, 2024

Smt. Dakshabala Sarkar & Ors. Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.

Latest Legal News