Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation, Affirms Tribunal's Judgments

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court, comprising Hon’ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen and Hon’ble Justice Chitta Ranjan Dash, has dismissed a series of appeals filed by Bharat Petroleum challenging the compensation awarded in land acquisition cases. The court affirmed the judgments and decrees passed by the Land Acquisition Tribunal, emphasizing that the appellants were not entitled to notice under Section 8(2) of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948.

Delivering the judgment, Hon’ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen stated, "The appellants have failed to raise objections before the Land Acquisition Collector during the compensation assessment process. As per Section 8(2) of the 1948 Act, the service of notice is restricted to the Collector when objections are raised regarding the amount of compensation. Therefore, the present appellants, being the requiring body, are not entitled to notice in the land acquisition cases."

The appeals revolved around the increase in the value of the acquired land, as determined by the Land Acquisition Tribunal, which the appellants deemed unreasonable. They argued that the tribunal had erred in relying on certain exhibits during the assessment process. However, the court found that the reliance on exhibits was justified as they provided a clear picture of the prevailing land valuation on the day of acquisition.

Furthermore, the court noted that the appellants' reliance on the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was misplaced, as the present cases were governed by the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948. The court distinguished the cited decisions and ruled that the appellants had not obtained the necessary leave from the court before filing the appeals, rendering them defective.

The judgment reaffirms the principle that the Land Acquisition Tribunal's decisions should be respected unless there is a clear error of law or fact. The ruling will have significant implications for land acquisition cases and sets a precedent for the interpretation of the relevant provisions under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948.

The court's decision has also granted the appellants the liberty to withdraw the remaining deposited amount, along with interest, from the office of the Learned Registrar General, High Court at Calcutta. The judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to the legal procedures and obtaining the necessary permissions before filing appeals.

Date of Decision: 13th June 2023

Bharat Petroleum  VS  Md. Sayeedul Islam Mir and Anr.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Bharat-Gas-Vs-Sayeedul-Islam-13June-23-Cal-HC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News