POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Custodial Interrogation Is Not Punitive — Arrest Cannot Be Used as a Tool to Humiliate in Corporate Offence Allegations: Delhi High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Reasonable Grounds Under Section 37 of NDPS Act Cannot Be Equated with Proof; They Must Reflect More Than Suspicion, But Less Than Conviction: J&K HC Apprehension to Life Is a Just Ground for Transfer When Roots Lie in History of Ideological Violence: Bombay High Court Transfers Defamation Suits Against Hamid Dabholkar, Nikhil Wagle From Goa to Maharashtra Violation of Income Tax Law Doesn’t Void Cheque Bounce Offence: Supreme Court Overrules Kerala HC, Says Section 138 NI Act Stands Independent Overstaying Licensee Cannot Evade Double Damages by Legal Technicalities: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Is Not a Stamp of Truth: Punjab & Haryana High Court Trademark Law Must Protect Reputation, Not Reward Delay Tactics: Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to FedEx Against Dishonest Use of Its Well-Known Mark Commercial Dispute Need Not Wait for a Written Contract: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs.6 Lakh Decree in Rent Recovery Suit Against Storage Defaulter Limitation Begins From Refusal, Not Date of Agreement—Especially When Title Was Under Litigation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sale by Karta of Ancestral Property Without Legal Necessity Is Voidable, Not Void: Madras High Court Dismisses Sons’ Appeal Demand for Gold at 'Chhoochhak' Ceremony Not Dowry – Demand Must Connected With Marriage: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claims Cannot Be Decided on Sympathy – Involvement of Offending Vehicle Must Be Proved: Supreme Court Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Ladder for Career Advancement – It Ends Once Exercised: Supreme Court In Absence of Minimum Fee, Compounding by Revenue Officials Is Not Criminal Misconduct: Kerala High Court Clarifies Power, Quashes FIR Against Two Accused If You’re in Service on 31st March, You Get the Revised Pay: Supreme Court Affirms Right to 2017 Pay Revision for March 2016 Retirees

Calcutta High Court Calls for Balance Between Protection and Autonomy for Adolescents in Consensual Relationships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment delivered on October 18, 2023, a division bench comprising Justices Partha Sarathi Sen and Chitta Ranjan Dash has called for a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding adolescents and respecting their evolving autonomy in consensual relationships. The judgment, arising from a criminal appeal, highlights the need for legal reform and comprehensive sexual education.

The court's ruling in the case involving the conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act sheds light on several critical aspects of adolescent relationships and the criminal justice system.

"Looking at the poverty with which the appellant and the victim are living, the diseased condition of the mother of the appellant, we are sure that both of them have no means to travel farther for justice. For the poor people of the State, this Court being the only constitutional court is the last hope for any relief."

"Instead of protecting adolescents from abuse, the law exposes those in factually consensual and non-exploitative relationships to the risk of criminal prosecution and compromises the child protection mandate."

"Comprehensive sexuality and life skill education should also be integrated into the school curriculum. This should be an essential step towards safeguarding the rights and interests of adolescents and ensuring that their health, dignity, and overall developmental potential are advanced."

The case involved a non-exploitative consensual sexual relationship between two adolescents, which led to the conviction of the appellant under the POCSO Act. However, the court emphasized that the circumstances of the case warranted a different approach.

In the judgment, the court invoked its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) and Article 226 of the Constitution of India to set aside the conviction. The judges took into consideration the economic conditions and suffering of the victim, who was managing the family with an ailing mother-in-law and a small child.

The ruling underscores the necessity of balancing the protection of adolescents from sexual abuse with recognizing their normative sexual behavior. It also highlights the need for legal amendments to decriminalize consensual sexual acts involving adolescents above 16 years while ensuring protection for all children below 18 years under the POCSO Act.

The judgment serves as a significant call for reform in the legal framework and comprehensive sexual education to empower adolescents and respect their autonomy while safeguarding their rights and dignity.

Date of Decision: 18 October 2023

Probhat Purkait @ Provat vs The State of West Bengal     

Latest Legal News