Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Calcutta High Court Calls for Balance Between Protection and Autonomy for Adolescents in Consensual Relationships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment delivered on October 18, 2023, a division bench comprising Justices Partha Sarathi Sen and Chitta Ranjan Dash has called for a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding adolescents and respecting their evolving autonomy in consensual relationships. The judgment, arising from a criminal appeal, highlights the need for legal reform and comprehensive sexual education.

The court's ruling in the case involving the conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act sheds light on several critical aspects of adolescent relationships and the criminal justice system.

"Looking at the poverty with which the appellant and the victim are living, the diseased condition of the mother of the appellant, we are sure that both of them have no means to travel farther for justice. For the poor people of the State, this Court being the only constitutional court is the last hope for any relief."

"Instead of protecting adolescents from abuse, the law exposes those in factually consensual and non-exploitative relationships to the risk of criminal prosecution and compromises the child protection mandate."

"Comprehensive sexuality and life skill education should also be integrated into the school curriculum. This should be an essential step towards safeguarding the rights and interests of adolescents and ensuring that their health, dignity, and overall developmental potential are advanced."

The case involved a non-exploitative consensual sexual relationship between two adolescents, which led to the conviction of the appellant under the POCSO Act. However, the court emphasized that the circumstances of the case warranted a different approach.

In the judgment, the court invoked its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) and Article 226 of the Constitution of India to set aside the conviction. The judges took into consideration the economic conditions and suffering of the victim, who was managing the family with an ailing mother-in-law and a small child.

The ruling underscores the necessity of balancing the protection of adolescents from sexual abuse with recognizing their normative sexual behavior. It also highlights the need for legal amendments to decriminalize consensual sexual acts involving adolescents above 16 years while ensuring protection for all children below 18 years under the POCSO Act.

The judgment serves as a significant call for reform in the legal framework and comprehensive sexual education to empower adolescents and respect their autonomy while safeguarding their rights and dignity.

Date of Decision: 18 October 2023

Probhat Purkait @ Provat vs The State of West Bengal     

Latest Legal News