Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Calcutta High Court Calls for Balance Between Protection and Autonomy for Adolescents in Consensual Relationships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment delivered on October 18, 2023, a division bench comprising Justices Partha Sarathi Sen and Chitta Ranjan Dash has called for a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding adolescents and respecting their evolving autonomy in consensual relationships. The judgment, arising from a criminal appeal, highlights the need for legal reform and comprehensive sexual education.

The court's ruling in the case involving the conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act sheds light on several critical aspects of adolescent relationships and the criminal justice system.

"Looking at the poverty with which the appellant and the victim are living, the diseased condition of the mother of the appellant, we are sure that both of them have no means to travel farther for justice. For the poor people of the State, this Court being the only constitutional court is the last hope for any relief."

"Instead of protecting adolescents from abuse, the law exposes those in factually consensual and non-exploitative relationships to the risk of criminal prosecution and compromises the child protection mandate."

"Comprehensive sexuality and life skill education should also be integrated into the school curriculum. This should be an essential step towards safeguarding the rights and interests of adolescents and ensuring that their health, dignity, and overall developmental potential are advanced."

The case involved a non-exploitative consensual sexual relationship between two adolescents, which led to the conviction of the appellant under the POCSO Act. However, the court emphasized that the circumstances of the case warranted a different approach.

In the judgment, the court invoked its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) and Article 226 of the Constitution of India to set aside the conviction. The judges took into consideration the economic conditions and suffering of the victim, who was managing the family with an ailing mother-in-law and a small child.

The ruling underscores the necessity of balancing the protection of adolescents from sexual abuse with recognizing their normative sexual behavior. It also highlights the need for legal amendments to decriminalize consensual sexual acts involving adolescents above 16 years while ensuring protection for all children below 18 years under the POCSO Act.

The judgment serves as a significant call for reform in the legal framework and comprehensive sexual education to empower adolescents and respect their autonomy while safeguarding their rights and dignity.

Date of Decision: 18 October 2023

Probhat Purkait @ Provat vs The State of West Bengal     

Similar News