District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

Calcutta High Court Calls for Balance Between Protection and Autonomy for Adolescents in Consensual Relationships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment delivered on October 18, 2023, a division bench comprising Justices Partha Sarathi Sen and Chitta Ranjan Dash has called for a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding adolescents and respecting their evolving autonomy in consensual relationships. The judgment, arising from a criminal appeal, highlights the need for legal reform and comprehensive sexual education.

The court's ruling in the case involving the conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act sheds light on several critical aspects of adolescent relationships and the criminal justice system.

"Looking at the poverty with which the appellant and the victim are living, the diseased condition of the mother of the appellant, we are sure that both of them have no means to travel farther for justice. For the poor people of the State, this Court being the only constitutional court is the last hope for any relief."

"Instead of protecting adolescents from abuse, the law exposes those in factually consensual and non-exploitative relationships to the risk of criminal prosecution and compromises the child protection mandate."

"Comprehensive sexuality and life skill education should also be integrated into the school curriculum. This should be an essential step towards safeguarding the rights and interests of adolescents and ensuring that their health, dignity, and overall developmental potential are advanced."

The case involved a non-exploitative consensual sexual relationship between two adolescents, which led to the conviction of the appellant under the POCSO Act. However, the court emphasized that the circumstances of the case warranted a different approach.

In the judgment, the court invoked its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) and Article 226 of the Constitution of India to set aside the conviction. The judges took into consideration the economic conditions and suffering of the victim, who was managing the family with an ailing mother-in-law and a small child.

The ruling underscores the necessity of balancing the protection of adolescents from sexual abuse with recognizing their normative sexual behavior. It also highlights the need for legal amendments to decriminalize consensual sexual acts involving adolescents above 16 years while ensuring protection for all children below 18 years under the POCSO Act.

The judgment serves as a significant call for reform in the legal framework and comprehensive sexual education to empower adolescents and respect their autonomy while safeguarding their rights and dignity.

Date of Decision: 18 October 2023

Probhat Purkait @ Provat vs The State of West Bengal     

Latest Legal News