Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Calcutta High Court Calls for Balance Between Protection and Autonomy for Adolescents in Consensual Relationships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment delivered on October 18, 2023, a division bench comprising Justices Partha Sarathi Sen and Chitta Ranjan Dash has called for a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding adolescents and respecting their evolving autonomy in consensual relationships. The judgment, arising from a criminal appeal, highlights the need for legal reform and comprehensive sexual education.

The court's ruling in the case involving the conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act sheds light on several critical aspects of adolescent relationships and the criminal justice system.

"Looking at the poverty with which the appellant and the victim are living, the diseased condition of the mother of the appellant, we are sure that both of them have no means to travel farther for justice. For the poor people of the State, this Court being the only constitutional court is the last hope for any relief."

"Instead of protecting adolescents from abuse, the law exposes those in factually consensual and non-exploitative relationships to the risk of criminal prosecution and compromises the child protection mandate."

"Comprehensive sexuality and life skill education should also be integrated into the school curriculum. This should be an essential step towards safeguarding the rights and interests of adolescents and ensuring that their health, dignity, and overall developmental potential are advanced."

The case involved a non-exploitative consensual sexual relationship between two adolescents, which led to the conviction of the appellant under the POCSO Act. However, the court emphasized that the circumstances of the case warranted a different approach.

In the judgment, the court invoked its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) and Article 226 of the Constitution of India to set aside the conviction. The judges took into consideration the economic conditions and suffering of the victim, who was managing the family with an ailing mother-in-law and a small child.

The ruling underscores the necessity of balancing the protection of adolescents from sexual abuse with recognizing their normative sexual behavior. It also highlights the need for legal amendments to decriminalize consensual sexual acts involving adolescents above 16 years while ensuring protection for all children below 18 years under the POCSO Act.

The judgment serves as a significant call for reform in the legal framework and comprehensive sexual education to empower adolescents and respect their autonomy while safeguarding their rights and dignity.

Date of Decision: 18 October 2023

Probhat Purkait @ Provat vs The State of West Bengal     

Similar News