Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Bhakti Towards God for Peace and Happiness, Not for Disturbing Society - Bhajans, Rama Nama utterances, and Annadhanams are not prohibited or restricted: Madras High

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Madras, presided over by the Honourable Justice N.Anand Venkatesh, reinforced the right to conduct religious functions such as Bhajans and Annadhanams, emphasizing the need for responsible conduct and peace in society.

The court was hearing a writ petition (Writ Petition No.1430 of 2024) filed by L.Ganapathy against the initial rejection of permission by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Avadi Division, for an event scheduled on January 22, 2024, at KKR Kalyana Mandapam, Pattabiram. The petition challenged the order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

During the proceedings, the Honourable Justice Venkatesh sought clarification on the government and police policies regarding granting permissions for such religious functions. The court was informed that private events like Bhajans or Annadhanams in private enclosures do not require police permission. However, events with potential public spill-over or those in temples controlled by the HR & CE Department would need to be informed to authorities for necessary measures.

In his landmark decision, Justice Venkatesh observed, "Bhakti towards God is only for peace and happiness and not to disturb the equilibrium prevailing in the society." This statement underlines the judgment's ethos, ensuring that religious functions are conducted without disturbing public order or spreading misinformation.

The court disposed of the writ petition with specific directions, clarifying that such religious activities are not prohibited or restricted per se, provided they are carried out responsibly and without causing law and order problems.

Date of Decision: 22 January 2024

L.Ganapathy VS The Assistant Commissioner of Police

 

Latest Legal News