Statutory Interest Under Land Acquisition Act Cannot Be Denied For Delay In Seeking Amendment To Claim: Delhi High Court Natural Mother Has Preferential Right To Custody Of Minor Child Over Grandmother Under Guardians and Wards Act: Allahabad High Court Pendency Of Vigilance Inquiry Is Not A Ground To Withhold Payment For Admittedly Executed Contract Works: Andhra Pradesh High Court Maharashtra Stamp Act | Conveyance Executed To Perfect Title Pursuant To Earlier Agreement Must Be Treated As Part Of Single Transaction: Bombay High Court Commercial Petrol Pump With Pucca Structure Not 'Thika Tenancy', Civil Court Has Eviction Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court Evidence Of Intent To Cause Deaths Distinguishes Accused From Others: Delhi High Court Denies Bail To Athar Khan In 2020 Riots Case Unexplained Delay In FIR And Absence Of Medical Evidence Entitles Accused To Benefit Of Doubt Under Section 302 IPC: Gauhati High Court Custodial Death | Registration Of FIR Mandatory Upon Disclosure Of Cognizable Offence, Independent Investigation Required: Gujarat High Court Testimony Of Prosecutrix Is Not A 'Gospel Truth' And Must Be Evaluated On The Touchstone Of Credibility And Consistency: Allahabad High Court Motor Accident Claims | Appellate Court Has A Legal Duty To Award 'Just And Fair' Compensation Even In Absence Of Cross-Objections: Andhra Pradesh High Court Magistrate Cannot Summon Additional Accused Under Sec 204 CrPC Without Passing A Speaking Order: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | 'Representation' Under Foreigners Tribunal Order Is Equivalent To 'Written Statement', Requires Full Disclosure Of Foundational Facts: Gauhati High Court Order 21 Rule 32 CPC | Expert Evidence Regarding Age Of Construction Is Mandatory To Prove Violation: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Commissioner Must Form Opinion On ‘Justification For Delay’ Before Imposing Penalty Under Section 4A(3)(b): High Court Contempt Of Courts Act | Issuing Cheque To Induce Withdrawal Of Pending Litigation Amounts To Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Successful Recovery Of Weapon And Progress In Investigation Justify Grant Of Bail Even In Serious Offences: Kerala High Court Section 64 CPC | Private Alienation Of Attached Property Is Void: Madras High Court Slaps Contempt Fine On Judgment Debtors, Holds Mortgages Null & Void Limitation For Land Acquisition Reference Must Be Calculated From Date Of Knowledge If Statutory Notice Is Not Served: Madhya Pradesh High Court State Can Create In-Service Quota In PG Medical Courses Without Mandating Prior Rural Service As Condition Precedent: Punjab & Haryana High Court 69 BNS  | Mere Failure To Marry Does Not Establish False Promise From Inception: Telangana High Court

Bhakti Towards God for Peace and Happiness, Not for Disturbing Society - Bhajans, Rama Nama utterances, and Annadhanams are not prohibited or restricted: Madras High

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Madras, presided over by the Honourable Justice N.Anand Venkatesh, reinforced the right to conduct religious functions such as Bhajans and Annadhanams, emphasizing the need for responsible conduct and peace in society.

The court was hearing a writ petition (Writ Petition No.1430 of 2024) filed by L.Ganapathy against the initial rejection of permission by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Avadi Division, for an event scheduled on January 22, 2024, at KKR Kalyana Mandapam, Pattabiram. The petition challenged the order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

During the proceedings, the Honourable Justice Venkatesh sought clarification on the government and police policies regarding granting permissions for such religious functions. The court was informed that private events like Bhajans or Annadhanams in private enclosures do not require police permission. However, events with potential public spill-over or those in temples controlled by the HR & CE Department would need to be informed to authorities for necessary measures.

In his landmark decision, Justice Venkatesh observed, "Bhakti towards God is only for peace and happiness and not to disturb the equilibrium prevailing in the society." This statement underlines the judgment's ethos, ensuring that religious functions are conducted without disturbing public order or spreading misinformation.

The court disposed of the writ petition with specific directions, clarifying that such religious activities are not prohibited or restricted per se, provided they are carried out responsibly and without causing law and order problems.

Date of Decision: 22 January 2024

L.Ganapathy VS The Assistant Commissioner of Police

 

Latest Legal News