Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Bhakti Towards God for Peace and Happiness, Not for Disturbing Society - Bhajans, Rama Nama utterances, and Annadhanams are not prohibited or restricted: Madras High

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Madras, presided over by the Honourable Justice N.Anand Venkatesh, reinforced the right to conduct religious functions such as Bhajans and Annadhanams, emphasizing the need for responsible conduct and peace in society.

The court was hearing a writ petition (Writ Petition No.1430 of 2024) filed by L.Ganapathy against the initial rejection of permission by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Avadi Division, for an event scheduled on January 22, 2024, at KKR Kalyana Mandapam, Pattabiram. The petition challenged the order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

During the proceedings, the Honourable Justice Venkatesh sought clarification on the government and police policies regarding granting permissions for such religious functions. The court was informed that private events like Bhajans or Annadhanams in private enclosures do not require police permission. However, events with potential public spill-over or those in temples controlled by the HR & CE Department would need to be informed to authorities for necessary measures.

In his landmark decision, Justice Venkatesh observed, "Bhakti towards God is only for peace and happiness and not to disturb the equilibrium prevailing in the society." This statement underlines the judgment's ethos, ensuring that religious functions are conducted without disturbing public order or spreading misinformation.

The court disposed of the writ petition with specific directions, clarifying that such religious activities are not prohibited or restricted per se, provided they are carried out responsibly and without causing law and order problems.

Date of Decision: 22 January 2024

L.Ganapathy VS The Assistant Commissioner of Police

 

Latest Legal News