Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Bank Guarantees Must Be Honored Free From Interference by Courts: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, comprising the Acting Chief Justice and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mini Pushkarna, has underscored the sanctity of bank guarantees in commercial dealings. The Court made this observation while deciding the appeal in FAO(OS) (COMM) 296/2022, involving OFB Tech Private Limited and M/S KKSPUN India Ltd. and Ors.

The appellant, OFB Tech Private Limited, had challenged the earlier judgment of a Single Judge, which restrained them from invoking and encashing bank guarantees provided by the respondent, KKSPUN India Ltd. The case revolved around disputes arising from the performance of various contracts related to the manufacture and supply of different products.

In its detailed judgment, the Court clarified the legal position on bank guarantees, stating, "Commitments of banks must be honoured free from interference by the courts. Otherwise, trust in commerce internal and international would be irreparably damaged." This observation emphasizes the autonomy and independence of bank guarantees in commercial transactions.

The Court further noted, "In order to restrain the operation either of irrevocable letter of credit or of confirmed letter of credit or of bank guarantee, there should be serious dispute and there should be good prima facie case of fraud and special equities in the form of preventing irretrievable injustice between the parties."

Addressing the specific contentions of the case, the Bench held that no prima facie case of fraud or irretrievable injustice was established by the respondent, thereby warranting no restraint on the invocation of the bank guarantees. The Court allowed the appeal, stating that the banks are bound to honor the guarantees as per their terms, as they are unconditional and unequivocal.

Date of Decision: 01 February, 2024

OFB TECH PRIVATE LIMITED VS M/S KKSPUN INDIA LTD AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News