Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Bail to Accused in RPG Attack on Mohali Case – Not Named In FIR: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted bail to two accused individuals, Manpreet Singh alias Patwari and Gurjinder Singh alias Gurinder Singh alias Baba, in a case related to the RPG attack on Mohali. The decision comes after a detailed examination of the evidence and circumstances surrounding the case.

The RPG attack on Mohali had garnered widespread attention due to the seriousness of the charges. The accused were facing charges under Sections 307 (attempt to murder), 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code. Additionally, they were accused of violating Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act and Section 25 of the Arms Act.

One of the notable aspects of the judgment was the court's consideration of the accused's role in the incident. The court emphasized that the petitioners, Manpreet Singh and Gurjinder Singh, were not named in the First Information Report (FIR) and were not apprehended at the scene of the incident. Moreover, there was no recovery of firearms or narcotics from these individuals. The court found that there was no concrete evidence linking them to the alleged attack.

In its decision, the court also highlighted that the incident appeared to have occurred spontaneously, without prior conspiracy or common intention on the part of the accused. The judgment cited the absence of injuries inflicted on any person, particularly the police officials, as a key factor.

Furthermore, the court took into account the prolonged period of custody for both petitioners. Manpreet Singh had been in custody since May 25, 2022, while Gurjinder Singh had been incarcerated since June 6, 2022. With 37 prosecution witnesses yet to be examined and all of them being official witnesses, the court concluded that the petitioners were not likely to influence the witnesses or hinder the trial.

The court's decision was also influenced by the absence of any prior criminal convictions or ongoing cases against the accused individuals. Citing the Supreme Court's judgment in "Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi Vs. State of U.P. and another," the court underscored the need to consider the facts and circumstances of each case when deciding bail applications.

High Court court granted bail to Manpreet Singh alias Patwari and Gurjinder Singh alias Gurinder Singh alias Baba, subject to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court and the condition that they do not engage in any criminal activity or attempt to influence witnesses in the future.

The judgment underscores the principle that bail decisions should be based on a careful examination of the evidence and circumstances of each case, and that the accused's role should be a crucial factor in determining their eligibility for bail.

Date of Decision: 25 September 2023

Sukhchain Singh alias Bhujia  vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News