Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     Sudden Fight Without Premeditation Led to Fatal Injury, Not Murder: Supreme Court Reduces Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide    |     Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds Indefinite Suspension of Bar License Without Reason Violates Natural Justice Principles    |     Statements Recorded Under Section 108 of the Customs Act Do Not Warrant Pre-Arrest Bail: Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Petitioners in Gold Smuggling Case    |     Muslim Law | Delay in Declaring Matrimonial Status Does Not Apply to Divorce Cases: Allahabad HC    |     Absence of Doctor's Certification on Victim's Mental Fitness Makes Dying Declaration Unreliable: Allahabad High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case    |     Dying Declaration Can Sustain Conviction Even Without Doctor's Certificate of Fitness: Punjab & Haryana HC Upholds Conviction in Dowry Death Case    |     Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Cruelty Without Sufficient Evidence: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Abetment of Suicide and Cruelty    |     Right to Hearing: Petitioners Must Be Heard Before Finalizing FTL of Durgam Cheruvu: Telangana High Court Directs No Demolition Until Decision    |     No Fresh Consent Needed Under Section 50 of NDPS Act Once Accused Elects Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate: Punjab and Haryana High Court    |     Suspicious Circumstances Around the 1993 Will: Wife Declared Dead While Alive: Calcutta HC Voids Probate    |     Extension of Sale Deed Deadline Prima Facie Binding, Time Not Essence of the Contract: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit    |     Law Does Not Compel the Impossible : High Court Invokes Doctrine of Impossibility in Pension Eligibility Case    |     Bar Council of India Mandates Criminal Background Checks, Biometric Attendance, and Strict Employment Declarations for Law Students    |     Service Law | Grant of Prosecution Sanction is Not Enough for Sealed Cover: SC Upholds DPC Findings in Favor of IRS Officer    |     Stamp Act | Agreements to Sell with Possession Clauses Are Conveyances and Must Be Stamped Separately: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Directs Immediate Implementation of Electronic Road Safety Monitoring Under Motor Vehicles Act    |     Supreme Court Stays Defamation Proceedings Against Shashi Tharoor, Issues Notice on "Person Aggrieved" Under Section 199 CrPC    |     Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention Violates Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in Murder Conspiracy Case    |     Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity of the Exhumed Body: Supreme Court Acquits Police Officers in Custodial Death Case    |    

Bail in NDPS Case: Non-Applicability of Section 37 for Lesser Quantity Even Total Recovery is Commercial: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has granted bail to Sahnwas Shaikh, who was detained under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possessing 45 grams of heroin. This landmark decision came after careful consideration of the quantity involved and the lack of substantial evidence connecting the appellant to a larger quantity seized from co-accused.

The apex court, comprising Justices Aniruddha Bose and Augustine George Masih, observed that the "continued detention of the appellant is unnecessary in the facts of the given case." This statement underscored the Court's position on the matter, especially considering the quantity of contraband recovered from Shaikh was below the commercial quantity as specified in the NDPS Act.

Highlighting the crucial aspect of bail conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the Court noted, "It does not appear to us that the condition specified in Section 37 for refusing the plea for bail would apply in the case of the appellant." This observation marks a significant stance on judicial discretion in bail matters, especially in cases involving narcotics.

Shaikh, in custody since April 23, 2022, was granted relief with the Court setting aside the impugned order of the High Court. The Supreme Court directed that Shaikh be released on bail, imposing specific conditions for his release. These include not entering the limits of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation without the Trial Court's permission and maintaining active communication with the Investigating Officer.

The Court's decision emphasizes the importance of considering the individual circumstances of each case, especially in the context of bail under the stringent NDPS Act. The ruling is a reminder of the judiciary's role in balancing the rights of individuals with the requirements of justice.

In their order, the Justices clarified, "The observations made in this order are, prima facie, based on the materials available at this stage and the same shall not in any way influence the Trial Court in the main trial." This statement ensures that the observations made during the bail hearing will not impact the fairness of the impending trial.

Date of Decision - 13-Dec-2023

SAHNWAS SHAIKH VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL     

 

Similar News