Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Bail Denied For Posting Offensive Social Media Content against PM Narinder Modi

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Ahmedabad, Gujarat: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Gujarat, presided over by Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai, denied bail to an individual accused of posting offensive and abusive content on social media platforms against PM Narinder Modi. The judgment, delivered on 6th June 2023, highlights the court's concerns over the potential for communal unrest and disturbance of peace in society.

The applicant had filed a regular bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with a First Information Report (FIR) registered at Sikka Police Station, Jamnagar District. The charges against the applicant included offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Sections 120 (B), 153 (A), 283 (2) (A), 294 (B), 295 (A), 298, 469, 500, 501, and 505 (2), as well as Section 67 of the Information Technology Act.

The court's oral order emphasized the offensive nature of the content posted by the applicant, which included derogatory remarks against the Honorable Prime Minister and his late mother, as well as the presence of obscene and pornographic material on the applicant's Facebook page. Justice Nirzar S. Desai stated, "The present applicant who is an Indian Citizen has made all the attempts to destabilize the peace in the society, and prima facie, the posts made by the present applicant seem to be agenda driven." The court further highlighted the potential damage caused by the applicant's posts on social media, noting that they could influence and harm communal harmony.

Considering the seriousness of the offenses and the potential for recurrence, the court denied bail, stating, "If such a person is granted bail, there are all the chances that he may commit such an offense once again." The court also emphasized the need to expedite the trial in light of the maximum punishment being five years.

Date : 06/06/2023

AFSALBHAI KASAMBHAI LAKHANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News