Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Bail Denied For Posting Offensive Social Media Content against PM Narinder Modi

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Ahmedabad, Gujarat: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Gujarat, presided over by Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai, denied bail to an individual accused of posting offensive and abusive content on social media platforms against PM Narinder Modi. The judgment, delivered on 6th June 2023, highlights the court's concerns over the potential for communal unrest and disturbance of peace in society.

The applicant had filed a regular bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with a First Information Report (FIR) registered at Sikka Police Station, Jamnagar District. The charges against the applicant included offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Sections 120 (B), 153 (A), 283 (2) (A), 294 (B), 295 (A), 298, 469, 500, 501, and 505 (2), as well as Section 67 of the Information Technology Act.

The court's oral order emphasized the offensive nature of the content posted by the applicant, which included derogatory remarks against the Honorable Prime Minister and his late mother, as well as the presence of obscene and pornographic material on the applicant's Facebook page. Justice Nirzar S. Desai stated, "The present applicant who is an Indian Citizen has made all the attempts to destabilize the peace in the society, and prima facie, the posts made by the present applicant seem to be agenda driven." The court further highlighted the potential damage caused by the applicant's posts on social media, noting that they could influence and harm communal harmony.

Considering the seriousness of the offenses and the potential for recurrence, the court denied bail, stating, "If such a person is granted bail, there are all the chances that he may commit such an offense once again." The court also emphasized the need to expedite the trial in light of the maximum punishment being five years.

Date : 06/06/2023

AFSALBHAI KASAMBHAI LAKHANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News