Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Bail Denied For Posting Offensive Social Media Content against PM Narinder Modi

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Ahmedabad, Gujarat: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Gujarat, presided over by Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai, denied bail to an individual accused of posting offensive and abusive content on social media platforms against PM Narinder Modi. The judgment, delivered on 6th June 2023, highlights the court's concerns over the potential for communal unrest and disturbance of peace in society.

The applicant had filed a regular bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with a First Information Report (FIR) registered at Sikka Police Station, Jamnagar District. The charges against the applicant included offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Sections 120 (B), 153 (A), 283 (2) (A), 294 (B), 295 (A), 298, 469, 500, 501, and 505 (2), as well as Section 67 of the Information Technology Act.

The court's oral order emphasized the offensive nature of the content posted by the applicant, which included derogatory remarks against the Honorable Prime Minister and his late mother, as well as the presence of obscene and pornographic material on the applicant's Facebook page. Justice Nirzar S. Desai stated, "The present applicant who is an Indian Citizen has made all the attempts to destabilize the peace in the society, and prima facie, the posts made by the present applicant seem to be agenda driven." The court further highlighted the potential damage caused by the applicant's posts on social media, noting that they could influence and harm communal harmony.

Considering the seriousness of the offenses and the potential for recurrence, the court denied bail, stating, "If such a person is granted bail, there are all the chances that he may commit such an offense once again." The court also emphasized the need to expedite the trial in light of the maximum punishment being five years.

Date : 06/06/2023

AFSALBHAI KASAMBHAI LAKHANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News