Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Appellants Failed to Prove The Genuineness/Existence Of The Will – Declared Null and Void: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement that may set a precedent in property dispute cases, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has declared an alleged Will dated 13.12.1973 as 'illegal and void'. The judgement was pronounced in the case of Narinder Singh @ Nidhan Singh and others versus Jasbir Singh and others, resolving a longstanding dispute over property inheritance.

The Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal filed by the appellants, upholding the decisions of the lower courts, which had favored the plaintiffs in a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction. The appellants had contested the judgements and decrees dated 30.11.2015 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mohali, and 17.11.2022 by the Additional District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali).

A critical point in the judgement was the Court's observation on the alleged Will. The Court noted, "The validity and genuineness of the alleged Will executed by Hardial Singh were central to the dispute. The appellants failed to prove the genuineness/existence of the Will, leading to the conclusion that the Will was illegal and void."

The property in question, located in village Tangori, was subject to a mutation of inheritance based on the disputed Will. The Court's decision not only declared the Will void but also deemed the subsequent transfers based on this Will as invalid.

Highlighting the application of the Limitation Act in such cases, the Court observed, "There is no limitation for a suit for declaration based on title, and the cause of action arises from the date of knowledge of the mutation."

This ruling emphasizes the burden of proof on the appellants, as they were unable to produce the original Will or credible secondary evidence. Consequently, their claims were dismissed.

High Court stated, "The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration," thereby resolving a complex property dispute and setting a significant legal precedent.

Date of Decision: 12 January 2024

Narinder Singh @ Nidhan Singh and others VS Jasbir Singh and others 

 

Similar News