Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Appellants Failed to Prove The Genuineness/Existence Of The Will – Declared Null and Void: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement that may set a precedent in property dispute cases, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has declared an alleged Will dated 13.12.1973 as 'illegal and void'. The judgement was pronounced in the case of Narinder Singh @ Nidhan Singh and others versus Jasbir Singh and others, resolving a longstanding dispute over property inheritance.

The Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal filed by the appellants, upholding the decisions of the lower courts, which had favored the plaintiffs in a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction. The appellants had contested the judgements and decrees dated 30.11.2015 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mohali, and 17.11.2022 by the Additional District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali).

A critical point in the judgement was the Court's observation on the alleged Will. The Court noted, "The validity and genuineness of the alleged Will executed by Hardial Singh were central to the dispute. The appellants failed to prove the genuineness/existence of the Will, leading to the conclusion that the Will was illegal and void."

The property in question, located in village Tangori, was subject to a mutation of inheritance based on the disputed Will. The Court's decision not only declared the Will void but also deemed the subsequent transfers based on this Will as invalid.

Highlighting the application of the Limitation Act in such cases, the Court observed, "There is no limitation for a suit for declaration based on title, and the cause of action arises from the date of knowledge of the mutation."

This ruling emphasizes the burden of proof on the appellants, as they were unable to produce the original Will or credible secondary evidence. Consequently, their claims were dismissed.

High Court stated, "The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration," thereby resolving a complex property dispute and setting a significant legal precedent.

Date of Decision: 12 January 2024

Narinder Singh @ Nidhan Singh and others VS Jasbir Singh and others 

 

Latest Legal News