Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Appellants Failed to Prove The Genuineness/Existence Of The Will – Declared Null and Void: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement that may set a precedent in property dispute cases, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has declared an alleged Will dated 13.12.1973 as 'illegal and void'. The judgement was pronounced in the case of Narinder Singh @ Nidhan Singh and others versus Jasbir Singh and others, resolving a longstanding dispute over property inheritance.

The Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal filed by the appellants, upholding the decisions of the lower courts, which had favored the plaintiffs in a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction. The appellants had contested the judgements and decrees dated 30.11.2015 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mohali, and 17.11.2022 by the Additional District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali).

A critical point in the judgement was the Court's observation on the alleged Will. The Court noted, "The validity and genuineness of the alleged Will executed by Hardial Singh were central to the dispute. The appellants failed to prove the genuineness/existence of the Will, leading to the conclusion that the Will was illegal and void."

The property in question, located in village Tangori, was subject to a mutation of inheritance based on the disputed Will. The Court's decision not only declared the Will void but also deemed the subsequent transfers based on this Will as invalid.

Highlighting the application of the Limitation Act in such cases, the Court observed, "There is no limitation for a suit for declaration based on title, and the cause of action arises from the date of knowledge of the mutation."

This ruling emphasizes the burden of proof on the appellants, as they were unable to produce the original Will or credible secondary evidence. Consequently, their claims were dismissed.

High Court stated, "The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration," thereby resolving a complex property dispute and setting a significant legal precedent.

Date of Decision: 12 January 2024

Narinder Singh @ Nidhan Singh and others VS Jasbir Singh and others 

 

Latest Legal News