Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Alternative Access Exists, Negating Easement of Necessity Claim: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court's decision in Manisha Mahendra Gala & Ors. v. Shalini Bhagwan Avatramani & Ors. pivoted around the concept of easement of necessity under the Indian Easements Act, 1882.

Facts and Issues: The Gala's claimed easementary rights over a road on the Ramani's property, asserting these rights were acquired by prescription, necessity, and under a Sale Deed dated 17.09.1994. The original suit in their favor was overturned on appeal, and the dismissal was upheld by the High Court. The Supreme Court examined if the Gala's had legally established their claimed easementary rights.

Easementary Right by Prescription: The Court observed that the Gala's failed to prove uninterrupted usage of the road for over 20 years, as required under Section 15 of the Indian Easements Act. Their vague pleadings of “last many years” did not satisfy the legal requirement for prescription.

Easement of Necessity: It was found that an alternative access to the Gala's land existed, thereby negating their claim of easement of necessity.

Transfer of Easement Rights: The Court noted the absence of evidence to suggest that easement rights were transferred to the Gala's under the Sale Deed dated 17.09.1994. The Gala's could not prove that their predecessors had any such rights to transfer.

Comparison with Another Easement: The contention of similar rights as another landowner (Dharmadhikari) was rejected, as Dharmadhikari’s rights were explicitly assigned in a separate sale deed.

Appellate Court's Power: The Court held that the appellate court was justified in overturning the trial court's findings, as it had the power to reassess evidence and findings.

Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, stating that the Gala's had not established any legal or factual basis for claiming easementary rights over the disputed road.

Date of Decision: 10th April 2024

Manisha Mahendra Gala & Ors. v. Shalini Bhagwan Avatramani & Ors.

 

Similar News