Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

"Allegations 'Wholly Insufficient and Far-Fetched': Supreme Court Quashes Dowry Harassment FIR Against In-Laws"

05 September 2024 5:16 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 31, 2023 — In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has quashed a dowry harassment FIR against the in-laws of a woman named Bhawna. The bench, comprising Justices ANIRUDDHA BOSE, SANJAY KUMAR, and S.V.N. BHATTI, found the allegations to be "wholly insufficient and far-fetched."

The Court observed, "Given the totality of the facts and circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that Bhawna’s allegations against the appellants, such as they are, are wholly insufficient and, prima facie, do not make out a case against them." The judgment further stated that the allegations were "so farfetched and improbable that no prudent person can conclude that there are sufficient grounds to proceed against them."

The case revolved around allegations of dowry harassment and cruelty against Bhawna's in-laws, Kusum Lata, Abhishek, and Sourabh. The appellants were accused of subjecting Bhawna to mental and physical harassment from 2007 to 2013. However, the Court noted glaring inconsistencies in Bhawna's allegations, particularly concerning her stridhan jewelry and her animosity towards her brother-in-law, Abhishek.

The timing of the complaint also raised eyebrows. Bhawna parted ways with her in-laws in 2009 but did not file a complaint until 2013, just before divorce proceedings were initiated by her husband, Nimish. The Court found this delay significant and stated, "The most significant aspect to be taken note of presently is that Bhawna admittedly parted ways with her matrimonial home and her in-laws in February, 2009, be it voluntarily or otherwise, but she did not choose to make a complaint against them in relation to dowry harassment till the year 2013."

Given these circumstances, the Court exercised its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR and the consequential proceedings against the appellants.

Date of Decision:  August 31, 2023

Abhishek vs State of Madhya Pradesh     

Similar News