Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Allegations Against Investigating Officer Himself; Further Investigation by Independent Agency Necessary – Kerala High Court in Edathala Property Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court, under the stewardship of Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, has passed a significant judgment in the Edathala property case, emphasizing the need for an independent investigation due to allegations against the initial Investigating Officer and the incomplete nature of the initial probe.

The judgment revolved around the adequacy and impartiality of the police investigation in allegations of property trespass and forgery, highlighting the importance of an unbiased and thorough investigation in the criminal justice system.

Subair, the petitioner, who represented himself, and his wife, alleged that their property was illegally included in the Panchayat’s asset register by a real estate group in collusion with Panchayat authorities. They argued that FIRs No. 754/2023 and No. 839/2023 filed regarding these allegations were inadequately investigated by the Edathala Police Station.

Concerns Over Investigation: The court expressed concerns about the way the initial investigation was conducted, especially the lack of forensic analysis of the alleged forged documents.

Allegations Against the Officer: Notably, the judgment pointed out allegations against the Investigating Officer, suggesting potential bias and a compromised investigation.

Independent Investigation Required: Justice Thomas underlined the need for an independent investigation, considering the deficiencies in the initial probe and the seriousness of the allegations.

The High Court of Kerala ordered the setting aside of the final report in Crime No. 754/2023. It directed the District Crime Branch to undertake a fair and proper investigation into FIR No. 754/2023 and FIR No. 839/2023, highlighting the necessity of an unbiased and thorough investigation in this matter.

Date of Decision: April 4, 2024

SUBAIR VS STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News