TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Allegations Against Investigating Officer Himself; Further Investigation by Independent Agency Necessary – Kerala High Court in Edathala Property Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court, under the stewardship of Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, has passed a significant judgment in the Edathala property case, emphasizing the need for an independent investigation due to allegations against the initial Investigating Officer and the incomplete nature of the initial probe.

The judgment revolved around the adequacy and impartiality of the police investigation in allegations of property trespass and forgery, highlighting the importance of an unbiased and thorough investigation in the criminal justice system.

Subair, the petitioner, who represented himself, and his wife, alleged that their property was illegally included in the Panchayat’s asset register by a real estate group in collusion with Panchayat authorities. They argued that FIRs No. 754/2023 and No. 839/2023 filed regarding these allegations were inadequately investigated by the Edathala Police Station.

Concerns Over Investigation: The court expressed concerns about the way the initial investigation was conducted, especially the lack of forensic analysis of the alleged forged documents.

Allegations Against the Officer: Notably, the judgment pointed out allegations against the Investigating Officer, suggesting potential bias and a compromised investigation.

Independent Investigation Required: Justice Thomas underlined the need for an independent investigation, considering the deficiencies in the initial probe and the seriousness of the allegations.

The High Court of Kerala ordered the setting aside of the final report in Crime No. 754/2023. It directed the District Crime Branch to undertake a fair and proper investigation into FIR No. 754/2023 and FIR No. 839/2023, highlighting the necessity of an unbiased and thorough investigation in this matter.

Date of Decision: April 4, 2024

SUBAIR VS STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News