CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Allegations Against Investigating Officer Himself; Further Investigation by Independent Agency Necessary – Kerala High Court in Edathala Property Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court, under the stewardship of Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, has passed a significant judgment in the Edathala property case, emphasizing the need for an independent investigation due to allegations against the initial Investigating Officer and the incomplete nature of the initial probe.

The judgment revolved around the adequacy and impartiality of the police investigation in allegations of property trespass and forgery, highlighting the importance of an unbiased and thorough investigation in the criminal justice system.

Subair, the petitioner, who represented himself, and his wife, alleged that their property was illegally included in the Panchayat’s asset register by a real estate group in collusion with Panchayat authorities. They argued that FIRs No. 754/2023 and No. 839/2023 filed regarding these allegations were inadequately investigated by the Edathala Police Station.

Concerns Over Investigation: The court expressed concerns about the way the initial investigation was conducted, especially the lack of forensic analysis of the alleged forged documents.

Allegations Against the Officer: Notably, the judgment pointed out allegations against the Investigating Officer, suggesting potential bias and a compromised investigation.

Independent Investigation Required: Justice Thomas underlined the need for an independent investigation, considering the deficiencies in the initial probe and the seriousness of the allegations.

The High Court of Kerala ordered the setting aside of the final report in Crime No. 754/2023. It directed the District Crime Branch to undertake a fair and proper investigation into FIR No. 754/2023 and FIR No. 839/2023, highlighting the necessity of an unbiased and thorough investigation in this matter.

Date of Decision: April 4, 2024

SUBAIR VS STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News