Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Summoning Order in Matrimonial Dispute, Emphasizes Thoughtful Consideration in Such Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the careful examination required in cases of matrimonial disputes, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad set aside a summoning order in a case involving allegations of assault, abuse, and theft of valuables. The court’s decision was based on the principle of “application of mind” in issuing summoning orders, highlighting the need for thorough consideration before summoning the accused parties.

The judgment was delivered by Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra on August 11, 2023, following a review of the impugned order and a fresh evaluation of the case. The case had been brought before the court through a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

In its observations, the court emphasized that summoning an accused in a criminal case is a serious matter and not to be taken lightly. The court cited the precedent set in the case of Mehmood UI Rehman Vs. Khazir Mohammad Tunda and others (2015) 12 SCC 420, stating that the magistrate must apply their mind to the facts and law governing the case before issuing process against the accused. The court further noted that matters involving matrimonial disputes require thoughtful consideration, especially when the parties involved are spouses and in-laws.

Justice Mishra iterated, “The magistrate is not required to delve upon meticulous examination of evidence recorded... He has to examine the nature of allegations made in the complaint and the evidence both oral and documentary in support thereof and would that be sufficient for the complainant to succeed in bringing charge home to the accused.”

Considering the ongoing matrimonial dispute between the parties and the existence of multiple complaints and cases, the court highlighted the need for a balanced approach in cases involving such sensitive matters.

As a result, the High Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the learned magistrate for a fresh consideration. The court directed that the complainant be given an opportunity to be heard, and a reasoned and comprehensive order be passed in accordance with the court’s observations.

Date of Decision: 11th August 2023

Smriti Singh And 5 Others vs State of U.P. and Another     

Latest Legal News