Summary Security Force Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Civil Offences Beyond Simple Hurt And Theft: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Vague Allegations Cannot Dissolve a Sacred Marital Relationship: Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Divorce Petition Daughters Entitled to Coparcenary Rights in Ancestral Property under Hindu Succession Act, 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Divorce | False Allegations of Domestic Violence and Paternity Questions Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Hostile Witness Testimony Admissible if Corroborated by Independent Evidence: Punjab and Haryana High Court Fraud Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt to Invalidate Registered Documents: Andhra Pradesh High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Rash Driving Conviction But Grants Probation to First-Time Offender Bus Driver Orissa High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband Convicted of Wife's Murder Merit Cannot Be Sacrificed for Procedural Technicalities in NEET UG Admissions: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Upholds Partition Decrees: Unregistered Partition Deed Inadmissible, Fails to Prove Prior Partition - Joint Hindu Family Property Presumed Undivided: Patna High Court Section 195(1)(b) CrPC | Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Undermined: Supreme Court Restores Evidence Tampering Case In a NDPS Case Readiness and Willingness, Not Time, Decide Equity in Sale Agreements: Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance Prolonged Detention Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case DV ACT | Economic Abuse Includes Alienation of Assets, Necessitating Protection Orders: Allahabad High Court Illegal Structures to Face Demolition: Bombay HC Directs Strict Action Against Unauthorized Constructions Justice Must Extend to the Last Person Behind Bars: Supreme Court Pushes for Full Implementation of BNSS Section 479 to Relieve Undertrial Prisoners Efficiency Over Central Oversight: Supreme Court Asserts Need for Localized SIT in Chennai Case Partition, Not Injunction, Is Remedy for Joint Property Disputes: P&H High Court Dismisses Plea Subsequent Purchaser Can Question Plaintiff’s Intent: MP High Court Clarifies Specific Relief Act Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court

Actual Salary Over Minimum Wage: Just Compensation’ Principle Upheld:  Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Court Enhances Compensation for Deceased Workman Based on Employer’s Testimony Despite Insurance Company’s Appeal

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, presided over by Justice Nyapathy Vijay, has significantly enhanced the compensation awarded to the family of a deceased workman in a road accident case. The court’s decision, delivered on July 3, 2024, in Civil Revision Petition No. 1159 of 2008, underscores the principle of providing “just compensation” and highlights the importance of actual salary evidence over statutory minimum wages.

The case revolves around the tragic death of Shaik Mohammed Ali @ Babujan, who was employed as a driver. On December 8, 1999, while returning from a pilgrimage trip, the vehicle he was driving met with an accident, resulting in fatal injuries to him. His parents filed a compensation claim, asserting that he earned Rs. 4,000 per month. The Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation initially awarded Rs. 2,05,170 based on minimum wages under G.O.Ms.No.58 dated April 9, 1991, which the claimants appealed.

Justice Nyapathy Vijay emphasized the credibility of the employer’s testimony regarding the deceased’s salary. “When the owner of the vehicle on oath states that the salary being paid to the deceased was Rs.3,000/-, there is no justification for the Commissioner to adopt the minimum wages at the rate of Rs.1891.75 per month,” the court observed. The court referenced the Supreme Court’s decision in Mamta Devi & Others v. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another, which upheld that the employer’s evidence should take precedence over statutory minimum wages.

The court underscored the importance of awarding just compensation, reflecting actual earnings rather than statutory minimum wages. Justice Vijay stated, “The purpose of the Act is to provide appropriate compensation to the dependents of the deceased. The fact that the claimants did not file an appeal should not restrict this Court to the incorrect quantum of compensation granted by the Commissioner.”

The High Court’s judgment aligns with the principle that appeals by insurance companies should not preclude the enhancement of compensation if warranted. Citing a Division Bench ruling in National Insurance Co. Ltd. V. E. Susheelamma, the court affirmed that it is within its jurisdiction to increase the awarded compensation to reflect actual earnings and just compensation principles.

Justice Nyapathy Vijay remarked, “The principle of just compensation would be applicable to cases under the Workmen’s Compensation Act as the purpose of both the Motor Vehicles Act and the Employees Compensation Act are similar.”

The High Court’s judgment to enhance the compensation to Rs. 3,25,365, payable within 30 days along with statutory interest, reaffirms the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring just and fair compensation for the families of deceased workmen. This decision not only rectifies the initial undervaluation based on minimum wages but also sets a precedent for future cases, emphasizing the importance of credible evidence and just compensation over statutory calculations.

 

Date of Decision: July 3, 2024

Koganti Siva Prasad and Others vs. Kommalapati Venkata Krishna and Others

Similar News