Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     Sudden Fight Without Premeditation Led to Fatal Injury, Not Murder: Supreme Court Reduces Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide    |     Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds Indefinite Suspension of Bar License Without Reason Violates Natural Justice Principles    |     Statements Recorded Under Section 108 of the Customs Act Do Not Warrant Pre-Arrest Bail: Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Petitioners in Gold Smuggling Case    |     Muslim Law | Delay in Declaring Matrimonial Status Does Not Apply to Divorce Cases: Allahabad HC    |     Absence of Doctor's Certification on Victim's Mental Fitness Makes Dying Declaration Unreliable: Allahabad High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case    |     Dying Declaration Can Sustain Conviction Even Without Doctor's Certificate of Fitness: Punjab & Haryana HC Upholds Conviction in Dowry Death Case    |     Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Cruelty Without Sufficient Evidence: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Abetment of Suicide and Cruelty    |     Right to Hearing: Petitioners Must Be Heard Before Finalizing FTL of Durgam Cheruvu: Telangana High Court Directs No Demolition Until Decision    |     No Fresh Consent Needed Under Section 50 of NDPS Act Once Accused Elects Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate: Punjab and Haryana High Court    |     Suspicious Circumstances Around the 1993 Will: Wife Declared Dead While Alive: Calcutta HC Voids Probate    |     Extension of Sale Deed Deadline Prima Facie Binding, Time Not Essence of the Contract: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit    |     Law Does Not Compel the Impossible : High Court Invokes Doctrine of Impossibility in Pension Eligibility Case    |     Bar Council of India Mandates Criminal Background Checks, Biometric Attendance, and Strict Employment Declarations for Law Students    |     Service Law | Grant of Prosecution Sanction is Not Enough for Sealed Cover: SC Upholds DPC Findings in Favor of IRS Officer    |     Stamp Act | Agreements to Sell with Possession Clauses Are Conveyances and Must Be Stamped Separately: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Directs Immediate Implementation of Electronic Road Safety Monitoring Under Motor Vehicles Act    |     Supreme Court Stays Defamation Proceedings Against Shashi Tharoor, Issues Notice on "Person Aggrieved" Under Section 199 CrPC    |     Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention Violates Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in Murder Conspiracy Case    |     Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity of the Exhumed Body: Supreme Court Acquits Police Officers in Custodial Death Case    |    

Acquittal In Murder Case - Circumstantial Evidence - Chain Of Events Is Not Complete - Presence Of  Eyewitness Doubtful: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India dismissed an appeal against the acquittal of six individuals accused of murder, underscoring the principle of extending the “benefit of doubt” to the accused in criminal proceedings.

The apex court, in its judgment in the case of Chhote Lal vs. Rohtash & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No.2490 of 2014), upheld the decision of the High Court which had earlier acquitted the six accused. The case pertained to the murder of Kishan Sarup, with the initial conviction handed down by the Court of Sessions under Sections 148, 201/149, and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The Supreme Court, led by Justice Pankaj Mithal, emphasized the importance of incontrovertible evidence in criminal cases, stating, “The prosecution in this case has failed to prove the guilt of the accused both by circumstantial evidence and by means of evidence of the eyewitness.” This observation highlights the court’s stance on the necessity of conclusive evidence for upholding a conviction.

The appellant, Chhote Lal, who is also the father of the deceased, was the sole eyewitness to the initial assault but not to the actual murder or the burning of the victim’s body. The court expressed concerns about the reliability of his testimony, noting potential biases due to long-standing enmity with the accused group.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court remarked, “In respect of circumstantial evidence, the chain of events is not complete whereas the presence of an eyewitness is also doubtful.” This statement formed the basis for the decision, reinforcing the legal principle that guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt.

The case did not feature any notable referred cases or specific advocates representing the parties. However, the ruling sets a precedent in emphasizing the rigorous standards required for criminal conviction in India.

The dismissal of the appeal by the Supreme Court in this case reaffirms the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring justice is based on solid and indisputable evidence, a cornerstone of the legal system.

Date – 14-Dec-2023

CHHOTE LAL VS ROHTASH & ORS.

Similar News