Supreme Court Orders Fresh Investigation in Case of Alleged Property Dispute and Fraud; Transfer Petition Disposed    |     Vague Allegations of Improper Cross-Examination Insufficient for Recalling Witnesses: Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order    |     Honorable Acquittal in Criminal Proceedings Invalidates the Dismissal Based on Identical Allegations: Allahabad HC    |     Supreme Court Orders Fresh Selection for Punjab Laboratory Attendants; Eliminates Rural Area Marks    |     Entire Story of the Prosecution is a Piece of Fabrication: Supreme Court Acquits Accused in High-Profile Kidnapping Case    |     Madras High Court Overstepped in Directing Framing of Charges, Says Supreme Court; Stays Proceedings    |     Foreclosing Right to File Written Statement Without Serving Complaint Too Harsh: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case; Compensation Reduced Due to Age and Health Factors    |     Prayers for Setting Aside Maintenance Order and Refund Not Maintainable Under Section 25(2) of Domestic Violence Act: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused on Grounds of Parity with Co-Accused and Prolonged Custody    |     Serious allegations of corruption demand thorough investigation Against Karnataka Bar Council Chairman:  Karnataka HC Refuses to Quash FIR    |     Probationers must be heard; a punitive action without inquiry is against natural justice: Punjab & Haryana HC Reinstates Judicial Officer    |     Refining Crude Soybean Oil is a Use of Goods Within the State, Attracting Entry Tax: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Arbitral Awards Cannot Be Overturned for Merely Better Views: Supreme Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeals Over Encroachment Claims Due to Improper Demarcation Report    |     Teasing by Children Cannot Be Considered Grave and Sudden Provocation Under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC: Gauhati High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Man Convicted of Murdering a 7-Year-Old Boy    |     ITC Blocking Under Rule 86A Cannot Exceed Available Balance in Electronic Credit Ledger: Delhi HC    |     Writ under Article 226 not maintainable when alternative remedies are available" – Delhi HC: Delhi HC Dismisses Writ Petition for FIR and Protection    |     Lack of Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Does Not Automatically Vitiate Proceedings: Calcutta HC    |     No Development Without Conveyance: Statutory Rights of Housing Society Prevail: Bombay High Court    |     Pecuniary Jurisdiction Based on Highest Valued Relief in Specific Performance Suit: Andhra Pradesh HC    |     Delay in Sale Deed Registration After Full Payment Cannot Justify Denial of Auctioned Property: Andhra Pradesh HC    |     Civil Judge Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Suit Under Section 92 CPC; District Court is the Competent Forum: Allahabad High Court    |     Children are not only the assets of the parents but also of society: Kerala HC on Protests Involving Minors    |     A cheque issued as security does not represent a legally enforceable debt: Madras HC Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case    |    

Abetment Has a Very Subtle Layer: High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Framing of Charges Under Section 306 IPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a crucial ruling , the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, presided over by Hon'ble Shri Justice Anand Pathak, dismissed a revision petition filed by Prabhudayal Sahu and family against the framing of charges under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The petitioners had been charged in relation to the suicide of Rachna Sahu, the deceased wife of petitioner No.3, Narendra Sahu.

In the decision, Justice Anand Pathak stressed that "Abetment has a very subtle layer and it does not mean only harassment or physical abuse." He further mentioned that "in a very subtle manner, the victim can be goaded or pressurized to commit suicide."

The case came to light following the tragic suicide of Rachna Sahu on March 13, 2023. The marriage between Rachna Sahu and petitioner No.3, Narendra Sahu, had been solemnized on January 20, 2014. The petitioners had argued that the case was registered based on "omnibus allegations" without the essential elements of abetment as per Section 107 of IPC. They urged the Court to discharge them from the case.

Responding to the petitioners' claims, the State of Madhya Pradesh argued that "innocence of petitioners and nature of evidence against them cannot be appreciated at this stage." The Court held that "At this stage, it is not to be seen whether trial would result in acquittal or not. Only allegations are to be seen to the extent whether the case is made out for trial or not."

Closing his observations, Justice Anand Pathak stated, "Here, at this stage, no specific finding can be given about culpability or involvement of petitioners in specific term." The Court concluded that the petition "lacks merits" and dismissed it.

This judgement serves as an important legal precedent for cases related to abetment of suicide and has attracted widespread attention from legal scholars and practitioners alike.

Date Of Decision: 3 October 2023

PRABHUDAYAL SAHU vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Prabhudayal_Sahu_vs_The_State_Of_Madhya_Pradesh-03_October_2023.pdf"]

Similar News