Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

"A Compassionate Approach Prevails" — Supreme Court Directs Insurance Company to Pay Compensation Despite Uninsured Trailer

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has taken a compassionate approach in a civil appeal related to motor accident compensation. The apex court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to direct an insurance company to pay compensation to the claimant, despite the trailer involved in the accident being uninsured.

The appellant, a 20-year-old laborer identified as Dhondubai, suffered severe injuries resulting in the amputation of her left lower limb in a road accident involving a tractor and a trailer. While the tractor was insured, the trailer was not. The initial compensation was awarded by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (MACT) and was later enhanced by the High Court. However, the High Court exonerated the insurance company, stating that it had no liability as the trailer was not insured.

The Supreme Court, under the bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, questioned whether the Court should exercise its power under Article 142 of the Constitution to direct the Insurance Company to pay the compensation.

The judgment read: "In such circumstance, it would not be possible for the claimant to recover the amount from the owner. Therefore, in that circumstance, we direct that the respondent-Insurance Company shall pay the amount awarded by the High Court as compensation with the accrued interest and recover the same from the owner of the vehicle."

The Court took note of the claimant's young age and the life-altering consequences of her injuries, including "prejudice to the marriage prospects and to lead a normal life."

The Court relied on a similar case, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Brij Mohan & Ors., to make its decision. In that case, the Court had invoked Article 142 considering the difficult circumstances faced by the claimant.

This judgment is likely to set a precedent for future cases involving uninsured vehicles and opens up avenues for a more compassionate approach to justice, where circumstances warrant it.

The Court directed that the amount should be deposited before the MACT within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, and then disbursed to the claimant.

Legal experts suggest this judgment will have long-lasting effects on how courts view insurance liability and compensation in motor accident cases.

Date of Decision: 28-08-2023

DHONDUBAI vs HANMANTAPPA BANDAPPA GANDIGUDE

Similar News