Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

15 days jail to advocate for contempt of court – SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Apex court observed in recent case (P.R.Adikeshvan vs Registrar , Madras High Court D.D. 23th May 2022) that behaviour and actions of the appellant, a member of the Bar, were utterly contemptible. As evidenced by the camera footage, he attempted to hinder the administration of justice when the competent police authorities attempted to serve him non bailable warrant. The appellant is complicit in the obstruction of justice.

In Solvency proceedings Madras High Court issued non bailable warrant against the appellant. When police approached appellant to execute warrant, appellant and fifty other advocates barred them from executing the warrant. On that DCP reported the incident to Madras High Court and also produced video clippings of that incident. On that High Court by order dated 14th July initiated criminal contempt proceedings against appellant and issued notice. Also framed charge against appellant.

By the impugned judgment dated 25 March 2022, the appellant was held guilty of contempt and was sentenced to undergo two weeks of simple imprisonment and was directed to pay a fine of Rs 2000. The appellant was also barred from practicing as an Advocate in the Madras High Court for one year.

Aggrieved appellant moved appeal against the judgement to Apex Court and submitted his apology and requested to be accepted.

Apex Court observed that the Madras High Court judge who issued the non-bailable warrant has been accused of making frivolous accusations. In addition, one of the judges presiding over the proceeding was asked to recuse himself on entirely incorrect reasons.

Appeal Dismissed.

D.D:- May 23, 2022

P R Adikesavan  Versus The Registrar General, High Court of Madras and Another 

Latest Legal News